What should be done to stop mass shootings?

@Hollywood Hulk Hogan
Whites commit the most mass shootings and most serial killers are whites, though.
Click to expand...
This is not true. Minorities commit the majority of mass shootings, both in gang-related mass shootings AND school shootings.

2015-2019 school shooters.jpg
2020 mass shooters.jpg2021 mass shooters.jpg
Serial killers: Black people have committed the most serial killings since 1990.

The best way to decrease mass shootings RIGHT NOW is to stop airing coverage of it on television. Much like the media stopped airing suicide due to copycat suiciding. Suicides would increase following news stories of suicides, which is why the media has a general consensus that they do NOT air normie suicides. Film and television also have guidelines specifically to curb certain depictions of suicides due to the increase of copycat suicides. Media dearly needs to follow suit with mass shooters. The shootings have increased due to media coverage. If they stop covering it, then the copycat shooters will go down. It won't cull the problem, but it will reduce shootings.

The majority of mass shooters have guns obtained illegally or use the guns of the parents. It's not legal gun owners that do this shit (generally).
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: potato in mah painus, Flaming Insignias, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 6 others
Deport all brown people. Over 70% of homicides in America are committed by nonwhites, and despite the fact that whites own most the firearms, we would be one of the safest nations on planet Earth if America had only whites in it. This of course includes mass shootings, the vast majority of which are by brown people like most other forms of wanton, pointless, simian violence.

America does not have a gun problem. America has a, uh, """people""" problem.
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed), Seafarer, Hollywood Hulk Hogan and 1 other person
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Teachers should choose their curriculum. They're the ones teaching it.
Click to expand...
I can guarantee your position would shift if the topic was intelligent design.

P.S.
I think ID is bullshit.
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Some guns are unnecessary for self defense. I've explained it to you many times, but your simpleton brain just can't grasp the facts unless they come from Fox News.
Click to expand...
Police in the United States routinely carry and use semi-automatic rifles against people with handguns or other weapons.

The use of deadly force can only be exercised when a person is a danger to others and has the capacity along with intent to carry out such a threat.

This means everytime a cop uses a rifle they are indeed using them in a defensive capacity. The goal of cops, unlike soldiers, is to keep the peace.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, SSj_Ness (Yiffed), Hüftpriester and 3 others
I hate mass shooters so much, bring back serial killers because at least they were more creative. Why has NOBODY shot up a fucking water park, all mass shootings are boring copy and paste. Uhhh durrrr I’m gonna shoot up a grocery store or a Walmart with an ar15 and kill 3 people, boring as shit, do something original for once FOR ONCE. 400 million fucking guns and 300 million fucking people in America and not one person has done some shit like bring a sniper rifle to a trampoline park and 360 noscope kids. At least shit like that would be interesting and funny. Like fuck dude if it’s the last thing you’re gonna do at least make it special and unique.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Seafarer
There's some pretty good articles that take a fairly level approach to these sorts of questions:
Blacks are a problem but not nessicarily in the way you think. Coming up with legislation to decrease "mass shootings" is going to be extremly difficult, or more likely, unconstitutional; such laws will most likely violate the 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th amendments.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flaming Insignias and AFAB
from a european point of view, americans are very creepy when it comes to guns; you guys are quite honestly obsessed
i can only remember a single person who owned one here and i've never seen one myself save for the very rare police officer with a holster (probably less than 5 times).

i never heard of niggers doing mass shooting either, they mostly seem to just kill themselves
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: potato in mah painus, Flaming Insignias, Equal Rights for Androids and 5 others
mass shooting hysteria is about one thing:

protecting police officers from guns capable of piercing their vests/body armor

The amount of people killed by assault rifles is essentially non existent. I saw a statistic on 4chan that more people were killed in 2022 by sticking things up their ass than were killed in 5 with ar15s.

If you die from gun violence in america it is going to be from your stripper girlfriend or a haitian hit squad armed with hi points.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, AFAB, *Grunts Softly* and 1 other person
Equal Rights for Androids said:
@Hollywood Hulk Hogan

This is not true. Minorities commit the majority of mass shootings, both in gang-related mass shootings AND school shootings.

View attachment 4858356
View attachment 4858360View attachment 4858361
Serial killers: Black people have committed the most serial killings since 1990.

The best way to decrease mass shootings RIGHT NOW is to stop airing coverage of it on television. Much like the media stopped airing suicide due to copycat suiciding. Suicides would increase following news stories of suicides, which is why the media has a general consensus that they do NOT air normie suicides. Film and television also have guidelines specifically to curb certain depictions of suicides due to the increase of copycat suicides. Media dearly needs to follow suit with mass shooters. The shootings have increased due to media coverage. If they stop covering it, then the copycat shooters will go down. It won't cull the problem, but it will reduce shootings.

The majority of mass shooters have guns obtained illegally or use the guns of the parents. It's not legal gun owners that do this shit (generally).
Click to expand...
Does a school shooting in this case mean happened in a school AND isn't gang related?

I'm sympathetic to the idea of covering it less, especially just because I find it disgusting the orgiastic tone of the reporting, you can practically hear them beating off as they talk about the tragedy. But at the same time, a lack of reporting also means a lack of data and sets a very dangerous precedent. Do we want important social dysfunction to be shielded from us? There was a guy on here the other day talking about how Japan is actually a lot more violent than they claim because they sweep things under the rug.

Way back when this stuff first really started kicking off (Adam Lanza, I think), I wanted a code of reporting that would:
1) Ban any sort of speculation about motive (back then they were constantly jumping to baseless speculation about how the shooter was PROBABLY a Right-winger)
2) Ban any reporting other than that a shooting happened until the police give their report
3) Greatly limits time legally permitted for coverage on TV
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flaming Insignias
Ughubughughughughughghlug said:
a lack of reporting also means a lack of data
Click to expand...
No, it doesn't. Suicide rates are still collected despite a lack of coverage on the news. Mass shootings are not any different—black-on-black mass shootings happen often in Chicago, aren't covered on the news, yet are added to annual mass shooting data. The social dysfunction you're talking about is over 70% black people causing issues. If you got rid of them, mass/school shootings would decrease by 70%. It's not guns that are the problem. It's black people.

Ughubughughughughughghlug said:
Japan is actually a lot more violent than they claim because they sweep things under the rug.
Click to expand...
Japan is very succinct in its data collection. It does not try to portray itself as a low-crime country by sweeping shit under the rug; it IS a low-crime country. It's the weeaboo fags who try to claim Japan is a utopia.

You should look to countries like Sweden for places that sweep things under the rug. They censor their media. A lot of violent crime being done by the immigrants yet Sweden hides it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias and SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
The best way of preventing mass shootings, is to gun down the mass shooters. I recommend a simple 12-bore shotgun, which can be easily and cheaply aquired, even here in lame ass Europe. Just point in the direction of the nigger faggot, and dispense the Kurt Cobain mouthwash with a pull of one or both triggers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias and SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Legally theres probably nothing one can do to stop it from happening. Socially however, i think we can prevent it by not using words like 'horrifying' or other adjectives that make school shooter/mass shooter types feel powerful and just call it what it is: faggotry. Parade the person around mocking them or their memory mercilessly to cement in peoples mind what a fuckin loser they are/were.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias and SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Sodomitic Necro-Coochie said:
Legally theres probably nothing one can do to stop it from happening. Socially however, i think we can prevent it by not using words like 'horrifying' or other adjectives that make school shooter/mass shooter types feel powerful and just call it what it is: faggotry. Parade the person around mocking them or their memory mercilessly to cement in peoples mind what a fuckin loser they are/were.
Click to expand...
Negative attention is still desirable to some, so just call them fag in passing and move the news cycle on as fast as possible and with as little sensationalism as possible.
 
I have two proposals, both of which have probably been brought up hundreds of times, but deserve to be brought up again because they are constitutionally sound and actually viable:
  1. Loosen firearm restrictions for law-abiding citizens and destigmatize public carry. Your average gangbanger probably doesn't own his firearms legally, and he almost certainly will not keep them secured in a holster. Ironically, people openly carrying their handguns are probably less dangerous than somebody keeping a Hi-Point stuffed in his waistband to cap a nigga who disrespect him. Because of these realities, it may be easier to harden soft targets than to try softening attackers. There'd probably be less spree shooters if they knew their targets could shoot back
  2. Actually enforce the law concerning "petty crime," and take measures to crack down on gang activity. Broken-window policing actually worked to turn NYC from a nightmarish hellscape to a reasonably safe metropolis, and it's becoming increasingly clear that refusal to prosecute looters and thieves has emboldened them. Most "mass shootings" come down to career criminals opening fire in crowds during disputes, so finding ways to lock these thugs up for what they've already done before they can commit worse crimes is probably the best measure. Al Capone was booked on Tax Evasion charges, after all.
Simple enough in my opinion, and definitely more fun than living in a Rainbow Police State like Europoors do.
 
thunderous ball lightning said:
gun rights is still important but I feel like a sensible and mild gun control is needed.
Click to expand...
I used to think that "reasonable" measures would be helpful in some way or another, but in reality they just end up getting abused and nothing actually improves. Also it's a nebulous term that could mean anything from "prevent drunk guy from buying a pistol" to "genocide all people darker than bleached mayonnaise" and no one wants to come to the middle to do something everyone can be okay with.

The reality though is, that no matter what laws you write or pass, there will always be people who do terrible things, regardless of tools available. For Christ's sake, Alek Minassian killed more people than most school or workplace shooters and he didn't even obtain a firearm.

The worst part of this whole ordeal is the TV and media vultures who will be using this shit to sell papers and ad space before the bodies are even cold. It's easy to blame the tool used or bad parenting or whatever, but the fact of the matter is, the prospect of having your face and name everywhere for weeks is really tempting for someone who believes his life has nowhere to go for whatever reasons he/she may have. Granted there are other factors at play but it is a factor that is noticeably absent with most other types of crime.

If you want to kill people, don't bring a fucking gun to school. Become a politician. Then you can commit genocide and be worshipped for it, and you'll more than likely never see a single day in jail. Even the wastrel offspring of politicians are held accountable for jack shit.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back