And that's what it's all about.
Either that or how badly the trannies and the fags were treated, but that's in part because of the time where the modern opinion about Hitler, the nazis, and the Holocaust formed: The 1990s. Telling the story of the evils of the Third Reich (with a focus on Jews) was only possible since the fall of the USSR to the present, due to two reasons.
I brought up those three because they left a clear legacy of not only conquest but also governance while Nazi Germany failed to ever enter the governing stage as an empire. The empires spawned by Temujin stretch from his Khaganate in the 13th century to the 18th with the Mughals. Trade routes matter less when you consider that every Turko-Mongol wannabe conqueror (e.g. Timur) claimed descent from Genghis Khan. Alexander created his empire which was split between the Diadochi who made the supremacy of Greek peoples possible. Their language, culture and philosophy are still relevant today as a consequence. Similarly, the Napoleonic Code is still used in one form or another across the globe. Hitler's legacy is only as a (failed) conqueror who opposed the current world order which makes it highly unlikely that he will be viewed as anything else. He had no time to finish great infrastructure projects or implement a new legal code because he lost his first war.
USA was powerful after WW1, but their supremacy was put into question during WW2 as Germany and Japan tried to increase their power and influence. If the US did not intervene, Germany and Japan would have likely dominated Eurasia so completely that USA's hegemony could be conceivably challenged. A hegemon cannot exist in isolation because there are always dissatisfied vassals and contenders willing to exploit them. This is also why USA is funding Europe's social safety nets and military protection. To ensure that Europe (and most of the world) remains complacent and compliant, USA ensures that they are dependent on you economically and militarily. If they didn't, these countries would turn to alternatives and give rise to a new contender for global hegemony. USA cannot become a hermit kingdom without losing their privileged status as the world's superpower. If they want to be the most powerful and richest country in the world, they must pay in money and death.
You have to win the war for territory acquired during it to count.
Global hegemony doesn't equal a wealthy country, or even the most powerful country. All you need is to make it impossible to invade your country and enough weapons to ensure MAD. That's why Russia is so powerful as Napoleon and Hitler discovered, because it's too big to invade and has an enormous amount of resources. That's why the US doesn't need Europe except in the minds of globalists. We just need to lock down the Western Hemisphere. This was even more true during WW2, where Japan and Nazi Germany were even less of a threat to American interests than the USSR was. It's obvious geostrategy which has never been tried because the American elite always looked to Europe and were often puppets of Anglo finance until the Anglos moved to NYC.
But they're totally vassal states beholden to our every whim. We certainly never found ourselves being lead by the nose straight into disaster by those very same vassals. Not even one time!
You keep going with that, you think any of the million of chinese and other peoples who died at the hands of mongols cared about legacy? that the inhabitants of Thebes thought getting erased from the face of the earth by Alexander was worth it because he would then spread hellenism across the known world? That any of the european countries ransacked by Napoleon cared about his reforms?
Hitler is already seen as such, he's is in a cruel twist of history far better known than any of his victims or the people who defeated him, thanks in no small part to the constant reminding that he was evil incarnate even when contemporaries like Stalin and Mao were more evil and killed far more people. But here's the thing, they killed mostly their own people, on their own countries well away from the west so nobody cares. Plus while national socialism its practically banned in the west communism is always popular so there's plenty of apologetic fools out there.
Those are all locations where he was never seen in as bad a way as in the West. You hear the name "Cixi" and for you it most likely doesn't mean anything, for the average chink it is basically the most evil woman ever. And no, the azovites, banderites, and other weird flavors of EE neo-nazism don't have an admiration to Hitler as much as that they agree with some of his policies and methods. This is just like how the average post-soviet likes Brezhnev, independent of their political allegiance
