Off-Topic When did you hit peak trans and why? - Finally realized that trans activism and gender ideology are harmful.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'm hitting another really weird peak now (assuming such things even exist any more), but it's kind of a weird one. I make occasional prowls around twitter for shit to put in the degen art threads. Recently, I'm starting to see people trying to sexualise those weird tuberous breasts troons develop. What I mean is, there are people drawing porn and deliberately making the breasts look disgusting and deformed.

NSFW example:


So far it's hiding behind monstergirl/alien/weird furry crap, but it's a distinct trend. I fully expect it to transfer over into the normie art world, sooner or later. Zippertits were bad enough, but now there are people who are so twisted out of shape by all of this that they're becoming sexually aroused by oestrogenic tumours.
 
I'm hitting another really weird peak now (assuming such things even exist any more), but it's kind of a weird one. I make occasional prowls around twitter for shit to put in the degen art threads. Recently, I'm starting to see people trying to sexualise those weird tuberous breasts troons develop. What I mean is, there are people drawing porn and deliberately making the breasts look disgusting and deformed.

NSFW example:


So far it's hiding behind monstergirl/alien/weird furry crap, but it's a distinct trend. I fully expect it to transfer over into the normie art world, sooner or later. Zippertits were bad enough, but now there are people who are so twisted out of shape by all of this that they're becoming sexually aroused by oestrogenic tumours.
It's gone, do you have an archive? Also, tumour tits have been all over etsy for quite some time now.
 
Gaslighting people by changing the definitions of words before their very eyes ("Only whites can be racist!", "Gender and sex are different!") is a staple of the modern left and it is one of the more revolting things they do.
Over the last few years they went from "uh, actually you are confusing gender with sex, you see gender changes but sex doesn't" to, "biological sex literally isn't real." If they have actually disproven the sex binary in anisomagous organisms that would change everything we know about how reproduction works. But instead of going off and winning a Nobel Prize for finding the third gamete they are just using this argument to say that men should be allowed to expose themselves to underage girls in the womens changing room. Almost as if there isn't any scientific basis to it or something.

Seriously saying that "male" and "female" were discrete biological categories wasn't controversial even a few years ago.
 
Over the last few years they went from "uh, actually you are confusing gender with sex, you see gender changes but sex doesn't" to, "biological sex literally isn't real." If they have actually disproven the sex binary in anisomagous organisms that would change everything we know about how reproduction works. But instead of going off and winning a Nobel Prize for finding the third gamete they are just using this argument to say that men should be allowed to expose themselves to underage girls in the womens changing room. Almost as if there isn't any scientific basis to it or something.

Seriously saying that "male" and "female" were discrete biological categories wasn't controversial even a few years ago.

It’s just plain laughable and ridiculous, but they have had a pretty consistent disagreement with reality for a while now.
 
Over the last few years they went from "uh, actually you are confusing gender with sex, you see gender changes but sex doesn't" to, "biological sex literally isn't real." If they have actually disproven the sex binary in anisomagous organisms that would change everything we know about how reproduction works. But instead of going off and winning a Nobel Prize for finding the third gamete they are just using this argument to say that men should be allowed to expose themselves to underage girls in the womens changing room. Almost as if there isn't any scientific basis to it or something.

Seriously saying that "male" and "female" were discrete biological categories wasn't controversial even a few years ago.

What gets me the most about all of this stupidity is that these were the very same people who argued for years that sexuality and sexual preference were biologically based, immutable, and unchangeable. Many LGBT leftists still hold this belief. They spent years searching for the "gay gene" that made a person gay, and even after finding absolutely zero evidence for any such biological impetus for sexuality, many of them still spout it as fact. They'll even hold both views of innate homosexuality and gender fluidity simultaneously, without a hint of irony or self-awareness.

Gender ideology, and LGBT activism as a whole, has no logical consistency or coherency whatsoever. They will say whatever they think will help them win. They don't care about truth, they just care about winning.
 
What gets me the most about all of this stupidity is that these were the very same people who argued for years that sexuality and sexual preference were biologically based, immutable, and unchangeable. Many LGBT leftists still hold this belief. They spent years searching for the "gay gene" that made a person gay, and even after finding absolutely zero evidence for any such biological impetus for sexuality, many of them still spout it as fact. They'll even hold both views of innate homosexuality and gender fluidity simultaneously, without a hint of irony or self-awareness.

Gender ideology, and LGBT activism as a whole, has no logical consistency or coherency whatsoever. They will say whatever they think will help them win. They don't care about truth, they just care about winning.
They're trying to enforce mandatory bisexuality now by saying that anyone who is exclusively attracted to one sex or another is a "genital fetishist". So the whole concept of homosexuality, the idea that there are people who are innately only attracted to the same sex, is being undermined by a movement started by homosexuals. And the insane part is that lots of actual homosexuals are going along with this madness.
 
They're trying to enforce mandatory bisexuality now by saying that anyone who is exclusively attracted to one sex or another is a "genital fetishist". So the whole concept of homosexuality, the idea that there are people who are innately only attracted to the same sex, is being undermined by a movement started by homosexuals. And the insane part is that lots of actual homosexuals are going along with this madness.
That one cracks me up. It's like they know, deep down, that they're unfuckable, sexless eunuchs that nobody - man, woman, gay, or straight - would ever find attractive. They have to bully you into dating them because they know they're so thoroughly repulsive that even wild animals would turn them down. Nobody wants their disgusting rot-pocket or Frankenstein's monster penis.
 
That one cracks me up. It's like they know, deep down, that they're unfuckable, sexless eunuchs that nobody - man, woman, gay, or straight - would ever find attractive. They have to bully you into dating them because they know they're so thoroughly repulsive that even wild animals would turn them down. Nobody wants their disgusting rot-pocket or Frankenstein's monster penis.
There are people who want them, they are called "chasers" and troons hate them precisely because chasers go after them specifically because they are troons. When they want sexual partners who think of them as True and Honest men/women. It's so creepy the way they insist on going after people who don't find them attractive.
 
There are people who want them, they are called "chasers" and troons hate them precisely because chasers go after them specifically because they are troons. When they want sexual partners who think of them as True and Honest men/women. It's so creepy the way they insist on going after people who don't find them attractive.

Plus chasers usually want something like an over the top sexualized tranny porn star, with huge implants and a massive cock.

Not a miserable weirdo who needs to be told they are a real woman every five minutes.
 
Gender ideology, and LGBT activism as a whole, has no logical consistency or coherency whatsoever. They will say whatever they think will help them win. They don't care about truth, they just care about winning.
This is a feature, not a bug. Which is why woke will never debate the merits of their arguments, since they know they will lose that way. All they can do is attack the character of their detractors, since that is the only leverage that they have.
 
They're trying to enforce mandatory bisexuality now by saying that anyone who is exclusively attracted to one sex or another is a "genital fetishist". So the whole concept of homosexuality, the idea that there are people who are innately only attracted to the same sex, is being undermined by a movement started by homosexuals. And the insane part is that lots of actual homosexuals are going along with this madness.
Do most homosexuals not realize that if trannies successfully convince everyone that sex isn't binary that there's no way homosexuality would even exist?I never understood this stupid logic of "If i as a male dress up and identify as a woman, lesbians will have to take me into consideration for dating otherwise they're transphobic."How in the span of a few years did homosexuals go from saying their sexual attraction was inherit and cant change to basically agreeing with trannies "Sex doesn't exist and isn't binary.Therefore, a gay male can be attracted to an AFAB person if they look like a guy despite having a vagina still."By these people's logic, what was stopping homosexual men from dating women who are masculine?Because they dont say the magic words of "I identify as a man"?Is that all it takes?
 
Do most homosexuals not realize that if trannies successfully convince everyone that sex isn't binary that there's no way homosexuality would even exist?I never understood this stupid logic of "If i as a male dress up and identify as a woman, lesbians will have to take me into consideration for dating otherwise they're transphobic."How in the span of a few years did homosexuals go from saying their sexual attraction was inherit and cant change to basically agreeing with trannies "Sex doesn't exist and isn't binary.Therefore, a gay male can be attracted to an AFAB person if they look like a guy despite having a vagina still."By these people's logic, what was stopping homosexual men from dating women who are masculine?Because they dont say the magic words of "I identify as a man"?Is that all it takes?
I think a lot of them are TRA in the streets and TERF in the sheets. They'll loudly talk about how other gays should fuck trannies but will absolutely not do it themselves.
 
I think a lot of them are TRA in the streets and TERF in the sheets. They'll loudly talk about how other gays should fuck trannies but will absolutely not do it themselves.
The entirety of gender ideology, and leftism in general, is filled to the brim with NIMBYs. This is why Dylan Mulvaney gets a never-ending stream of ass-pats on Instagram and TikTok, endless droves of liberal women - and even liberal men - telling him he's amazing and stunning and gorgeous and beautiful, and lives in one of the most leftist cities in all of the US, and yet struggles with dating and can't find a partner. Lefties and troons are all too happy to tell everybody else what to do, but don't you dare ask them to participate in their own plans.

It's almost like they all secretly know how god-awful their ideas and policies are and are just proclaiming them to virtue-signal and demonstrate allegiance to the dominant cultural zeitgeist. 🤔
 
The entirety of gender ideology, and leftism in general, is filled to the brim with NIMBYs. This is why Dylan Mulvaney gets a never-ending stream of ass-pats on Instagram and TikTok, endless droves of liberal women - and even liberal men - telling him he's amazing and stunning and gorgeous and beautiful, and lives in one of the most leftist cities in all of the US, and yet struggles with dating and can't find a partner. Lefties and troons are all too happy to tell everybody else what to do, but don't you dare ask them to participate in their own plans.

It's almost like they all secretly know how god-awful their ideas and policies are and are just proclaiming them to virtue-signal and demonstrate allegiance to the dominant cultural zeitgeist. 🤔

I don’t disagree that Mulvaney struggles with dating because of the immediate hypocrisy of his circle, but isn’t it possible that Mulvaney struggles with dating because he is an unbearable cunt?
 
I don’t disagree that Mulvaney struggles with dating because of the immediate hypocrisy of his circle, but isn’t it possible that Mulvaney struggles with dating because he is an unbearable cunt?
why-not-both-why-not.gif


Another thing to keep in mind is that Mulvaney looks like a walking goblin skeleton, but dresses in extremely expensive clothes. Anyone who hooks up with him has to be immaculate and extremely fashionable and able to keep a wardrobe that costs the average price of an American home, but doesn't mind that Mulvaney is genuinely disturbing to look at on every level. And you know that someone like Mulvaney has 'standards' in terms of a potential partner's body and facial features. He'll turn anyone down who isn't a millionaire supermodel, ready for the camera even when it's 3am and they're on the loo having a shit.

Mulvaney struggles because no one he's good enough for is good enough for him.
 
Back