toad of the depths
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2023
There exists a lot of aspersions cast on "rightoids" in the thread thus far, and I think its because no-one really articulates the implicit position of right wingers regarding troons, child grooming, etc. Simply put, hard line right wingers were already at peak trans b/c they've been appealing to teleology with respect to LGBTQ stuff since forever.
I'll attempt to summarize the perspective here:
The aprioristic assumptions of consent based morality, individualism, and the implicit assumption that sexuality between individuals has no bearing on society teleologically leave the door open to troons. There existed no baseline philosophical assumption within the premises given for the fudge packer normalization campaigns that would preclude the creation of something like the DIY HRT directory, and a more astute observer will see this undercurrent carried through anti-fascist, liberal, and "queer" theory throughout the 20th century. From magnus hirschfeld, John Money, the west german adoption stuff, NAMBLA and its tentacles in the gay rights movement, no-one who took opposition to this stuff seriously ever was under any illusions as to where it was going to end. To the "rightoid" seeing others catch up to one aspect b/c it finally affects them is simultaneously pitiful and humorous, and now that troons form a near hegemonic force in society, he fundamentally wonders how things could've changed for the better had people listened to him at any point prior.
To kill a weed, its roots must die. The philosophical roots of transgenderism, pederasty normalization, and ultimately, sexual abberance, are the same. You cannot defeat one without expunging the others, it simply follows as thermodynamic inevitability. Otherwise, the troon pederast simply exists as a more teleologically pure form of the assumptions crafted.
The right wing view may be "reductive" and brutal, but it remains consistent. There exist no carve outs. I am partial to it, hence my ability to articulate it, and so for the record, I've been at peak trans since I realized what it was 8 or so years ago through tumblr bullshit.
I'll attempt to summarize the perspective here:
The aprioristic assumptions of consent based morality, individualism, and the implicit assumption that sexuality between individuals has no bearing on society teleologically leave the door open to troons. There existed no baseline philosophical assumption within the premises given for the fudge packer normalization campaigns that would preclude the creation of something like the DIY HRT directory, and a more astute observer will see this undercurrent carried through anti-fascist, liberal, and "queer" theory throughout the 20th century. From magnus hirschfeld, John Money, the west german adoption stuff, NAMBLA and its tentacles in the gay rights movement, no-one who took opposition to this stuff seriously ever was under any illusions as to where it was going to end. To the "rightoid" seeing others catch up to one aspect b/c it finally affects them is simultaneously pitiful and humorous, and now that troons form a near hegemonic force in society, he fundamentally wonders how things could've changed for the better had people listened to him at any point prior.
To kill a weed, its roots must die. The philosophical roots of transgenderism, pederasty normalization, and ultimately, sexual abberance, are the same. You cannot defeat one without expunging the others, it simply follows as thermodynamic inevitability. Otherwise, the troon pederast simply exists as a more teleologically pure form of the assumptions crafted.
The right wing view may be "reductive" and brutal, but it remains consistent. There exist no carve outs. I am partial to it, hence my ability to articulate it, and so for the record, I've been at peak trans since I realized what it was 8 or so years ago through tumblr bullshit.