- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
The Rotherham Rape gang controversy really made me realise how much the legal system as a whole supports thugs and protects thugs from the natural consequences of thuggery. The police let those girls continue to get raped, and when people stood up the police went after them. The actions of thugs are treated with kid gloves, but when people fight back when the people appointed to fight for them cower, they're hunted. If white British men were walking into Kebab shops with knives and walking out with severed heads, a world's more effort would be put into fighting them than a muslim terrorist.
And it's not intrinsically even a race thing, the police defend muslim criminals, but they defend leftist thugs too, every type of thug is protected. It's to the point you can walk into a mans store and take his livelihood, both of you knowing the police will never do anything to stop the store owner being bled dry, but the store owner can't defend himself, he's just got to watch as some human detritus slowly takes his life's work away from him, because the police won't do anything aside from prevent him from fighting back.
I realized as I thought more about this, that society is so dedicated to preventing direct violence, that it prevents defense against indirect violence. So backwater thugs reign, allowed to softly torment a world that can't fight back, because the police don't care about what they do, but they do care to prevent others stopping them. My opinion of self defense changed from "Well you can defend yourself if you fear for your life I guess." to "Yes you can violently prevent people from stealing from you, and if someone wants to assault you, you don't owe them fairness, but a bullet right between their eyes, because you have no idea what they want to do you."
And it's not intrinsically even a race thing, the police defend muslim criminals, but they defend leftist thugs too, every type of thug is protected. It's to the point you can walk into a mans store and take his livelihood, both of you knowing the police will never do anything to stop the store owner being bled dry, but the store owner can't defend himself, he's just got to watch as some human detritus slowly takes his life's work away from him, because the police won't do anything aside from prevent him from fighting back.
I realized as I thought more about this, that society is so dedicated to preventing direct violence, that it prevents defense against indirect violence. So backwater thugs reign, allowed to softly torment a world that can't fight back, because the police don't care about what they do, but they do care to prevent others stopping them. My opinion of self defense changed from "Well you can defend yourself if you fear for your life I guess." to "Yes you can violently prevent people from stealing from you, and if someone wants to assault you, you don't owe them fairness, but a bullet right between their eyes, because you have no idea what they want to do you."