Why are so many "gender critical feminists" not critical of The Science in any other way?

Because, sadly, they're still full retardo leftists, it's just that the tranny scorpion stung them first and they're unable to surmise that all their other retard beliefs will have the same shitty conclusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry David's Opera Cape
Gravemind said:
Okay. So post examples of these discussions being had about other subjects on other sites then. First you said "feminism doesn't have to come up because there's no reason for feminism to come up", and now you're saying "feminists absolutely discuss other fields of medical sciences on other sites".

Prove it. You're making the claim. Prove your own case. Otherwise, it can be assumed that you're not arguing in good faith (which is already incredibly evident), and that you (and others) really only came in here to stir the pot. While also kind of proving OP's point.
Click to expand...
I know feminists do it because I am a feminist and I do it, and because I have friends that are feminists and they ... have interests other than feminism, shocking I know. A bunch of other women came in and said they do, but they aren't posting links to their accounts elsewhere. You just don't care what women have to say, they must be lying and we need at least 2 men present to see if it's really them typing yeah? There is no way to prove it to you because no one announces they are a feminist before posting on different topics. I'm not linking to my own accounts elsewhere either. You really are asking me to screen-cap conversations where feminists, who do not identify themselves as feminists in the comment, discuss things other than feminism?
Gravemind said:
Have you considered that you're only writing every other subject off as "random conspiracy theories" purely because they have nothing to do with the thing seemingly most pertinent to you?
Click to expand...
have you considered that you're a faggot
Gravemind said:
Your misplaced contention and elitism potentially based upon some form of inferiority complex is palpable. I don't know about those things, and I would be interested in learning about them, but not when the hyper-defensive response over my ignorance is just some rabid gnashing of teeth like that. Why would I want to explore any further into a given subject if I'm gonna get my head snapped off over it?
Click to expand...
that was not a response to you, so it's not a "hyper defensive response to your ignorance", also I'm not going to snap your head off for not knowing my fav schizo sites it's not that serious
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silence of the Troons
Gravemind said:
Feminists. The topic is about gender critical feminists. Not women in general.
Click to expand...
This is irrelevant to the question.

Why do you believe any woman would offer you their opinion on general science? Again, do you teach? Why would any female person be interacting with you, or specifically interacting with you on this topic?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silence of the Troons
Perun said:
I know feminists do it because I am a feminist and I do it, and because I have friends that are feminists and they ... have interests other than feminism, shocking I know. A bunch of other women came in and said they do, but they aren't posting links to their accounts elsewhere. You just don't care what women have to say, they must be lying and we need at least 2 men present to see if it's really them typing yeah? There is no way to prove it to you because no one announces they are a feminist before posting on different topics. I'm not linking to my own accounts elsewhere either. You really are asking me to screen-cap conversations where feminists, who do not identify themselves as feminists in the comment, discuss things other than feminism?
Click to expand...
So you and your friends speak for all feminists then. And I never said you had to post your accounts on these other places. I said you should post examples from these other places where such conversations are taking place. That is literally as simple as posting screenshots of posts and reply chains regarding said discussions. You could even censor out names for opsec's sake. There is a very easy way to prove this that I have now repeatedly outlined to those of you who continue arguing in bad faith.

Perun said:
that was not a response to you, so it's not a "hyper defensive response to your ignorance", also I'm not going to snap your head off for not knowing my fav schizo sites it's not that serious
Click to expand...
It doesn't have to be a response to me personally in order to highlight that you're being caustic over the potential of someone being ignorant about a topic. I feel like you are continuing to make my case for me here.

isalaide said:
This is irrelevant to the question.

Why do you believe any woman would offer you their opinion on general science? Again, do you teach? Why would any female person be interacting with you, or specifically interacting with you on this topic?
Click to expand...
Your question is irrelevant to the topic.

And probably because I have found I have been able to have these discussions with women in my friend group. Interestingly enough, they hate other women themselves and would most likely be inclined to view these responses as being unreasonable and missing the point.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Silence of the Troons
Gravemind said:
Your question is irrelevant to the topic.

And probably because I have found I have been able to have these discussions with women in my friend group. Interestingly enough, they hate other women themselves and would most likely be inclined to view these responses as being unreasonable and missing the point.
Click to expand...
Ah, Discord 'women'. I see.

Your opinion is not important, and neither is what you want. What women - any women - are talking about is nothing to do with you, and you will be calmer once you develop sufficient theory of mind to understand that.

You are not the main character; you are the NPC. You don't appear to even be a quest giver, so the main character women are not interacting with you.

Squealing about it like a pig isn't going to change that.
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Forbidden Existence, Silence of the Troons and Ken Barlow
isalaide said:
Ah, Discord 'women'. I see.

Your opinion is not important, and neither is what you want. What women - any women - are talking about is nothing to do with you, and you will be calmer once you develop sufficient theory of mind to understand that.

You are not the main character; you are the NPC. You don't appear to even be a quest giver, so the main character women are not interacting with you.

Squealing about it like a pig isn't going to change that.
Click to expand...
I mean, I could also make up a complete arbitrary and self-defined metric to say your opinion is equally invalid along with your wants and needs.

I don't believe I've maligned or disparaged any of you that have come into this thread to argue completely off-subject about... Whatever your point about feminism is. You've all also failed multiple times to tie whatever your argument is to the subject of the topic at hand without making the subject all about you and your general hatred of men.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
Reactions: Forbidden Existence and Silence of the Troons
What makes a woman is two X chromosomes. The tranny madness is not a pill every feminist is going to swallow.

As far as the other stuff.. it entirely depends.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back