Why do centrists exist? - Do they lack intrinsic morals?

PaleTay

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 25, 2020
Centrist are less about having their own individual opinions, and just value a relative centrism in regards to society in an almost tribal way where they hope to survive by having no consistent convictions. For example, a lot of people who had no issue with BLM rioting, but thought everyone should be in harsh lockdown a week before.

Are they just weak and going with the tribe?
 
In ideological civil wars, only about 30% of people are involved. Most people don't care enough.

It's usually a winning strategy. I don't think it currently is though, as although centrist have below average replacement rate, extremists of each side have above average replacement rate. So not only are extremists winning, in a Darwinian sense, it also means the future will be more extremist.
 
1643512512694.png
 
Someone's got to grow the food, build and maintain the machines, deal with the trash, fix the roads ... You've seen what happens when idealogues try to do that.
But the ideologues have already raised your kids to be non-binary with 8 mental illnesses, burned down and/or closed your business, brought in homeless on every corner, created no-go zones, and built coof camps. The world is already fucked if they don't get involved.
 
Because there's a difference between being a wishy-washy faggot and have the general presence of mind to identify and call out the failings, self destructive or not, of opposing camps. A stupid idea is a stupid idea, regardless of the origins.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: snailslime
Because picking predetermined sides makes you a tool, doesn't mean centrists can't have presonal opinions that lean to one side or the other, but becoming a textbook example of one side's 100% politics is a sad thing that happens to fucking often for some reason.
 
There are two kinds of centrism, one is spineless and the other is rational:

The spineless kind involves sitting on the fence, never taking a firm stance on any issue (think of Boogie for instance). It’s a fear of confrontation combined with the delusional belief that there can be a coherent middle ground between diametrically opposed ideologies.

The rational kind involves evaluating all issues independent of any particular political ideology. You make decisions on the basis of your own first principles regardless of where that might lead you in political terms. This is the ideal approach imo, otherwise politics becomes nothing more than a glorified sportsball competition where allegiance to your team outweighs everything else
 
Being bound to an ideology and being a centrist are two different things: you're allowed to be anti-semetic while not supporting the NSDAP and: you can be in favor of workers rights without being a dang dirty social democrat.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: snailslime
Back