Why do minorities and women in the US generally vote left wing?

1. Lack of critical thinking skills
2. Desire to be well-liked rather than to do what is necessary to allow actual progress to occur.

It doesn't matter what subject you bring up. The more clan-ish a group is, the more likely those retards are to vote for establishment-left policies. Kikes? Democrats. Niggers? Democrats. Sandwich makers? Democrats. Wetbacks, Gooks, Camel-Jockies? Democrats, democrats, democrats. Rainbow coalition? Gay democrats.

Now ask yourself and be honest, are any of those groups known for accomplishing anything that makes the lives of their neighbors better? No. Without fail, every single one of the listed groups is first and foremost known for in-fighting.

Straight white men? Built the entire fucking modern world.
For a long time, it is speculated that people move further left on the political spectrum with increasing level of higher education, and the exit poll data generally bears out this correlation, so it stands to reason that since a higher proportion of women attain higher education than men, the women will skew further left.
That's not true.

"HiGhEr EdUcAtIoN cOrReLaTeS tO vOtInG lEft" only applies to people with Bachelor's Degrees. PhDs/MDs/DDSs are just as conservative as blue-collar normies.

And the right doesn't even try to appeal to minority voters. When you just write them off as "They just want gibs me dats" as everyone in this thread has, what black individual is going to look at that and think "These guys are writing me off as a worthless leach and making fun of how they assume I talk in the same sentence? Fantastic, I should give them a chance and see what else they have to say!"
Shut up, nigger.

The right doesn't "appeal" to minorities because the only means of doing so is by pandering to them. Right wing values are egalitarian and for everyone. No gibs for nigs. No flowers for women. No beans for burritos. As long as you're able-bodied and willing to work, the right (in theory) will represent you.

But what do you do if they never crash? If the meth is sanctioned and handed out by the government?
In situations like this I just ask myself one simple question: WWFCD?

What would Frank Castle do?
 
Last edited:
I know most of it's probably just joking around here, but let's see: would you vote for the side that refers to you as someone who just wants their "gimmies", or is just a stupid criminal/terrorist/druggie/leech/harpy, etc? C'mon now. That's just plain fucking common sense.

And it's not just on the right, either. Prime example would be Hilary Clinton's comment about Trump supporters being a lot of "degenerates". Now would she have won if she hadn't said it? I don't know. I DO almost certainly believe it was a major factor in her losing the election. Whether it was true or not, you don't fucking say things like that.


I think the coming of the religious right in the 1980s really hurt the Republican party with women. Now, once again, a lot of people on the left need to stop lumping all Christians in with fundamentalists. Just like not all Muslims are terrorists, nor are all Christians a bunch of gay-hating fundies. BUT, the religious right does hold a lot of sway with the GOP, and it has definitely alienated women. I'm not going to vote for a politician that wants to take away not only my right to choose, but also in many cases think that birth control should be restricted as well. (Rick Santorum used to be my senator -- 'nuff said)
Tying yourself to a group that believes men should be in charge is going to turn women away.


About the whole "Party of Lincoln" thing. I read a comment the other day -- I can't remember where, so don't ask me to link to it. But someone basically pointed out that if you have to go all the way back to the 1860s to find an example of your party helping minorities? That's not really a point in your favor.

Speaking of "gimme", that's also not exclusive to the left, or minorities. Plenty of white people are on welfare, and hasn't it been shown that welfare recipients live mostly in red states? And forget welfare.
How much bitching do we hear about tax breaks for the wealthy? Corporate bailouts? If it's greedy for the guy down at the bottom to want to be paid a decent wage, why isn't it just as bad for the guy at the top who's just fucked over an entire industry to ask the government to bail him out?

Finally, the left tends to be the side of the under dog, and traditionally, that's where minorities and women have stood.

Look, I know this place has a lot of Trump fans. But you can't deny the dude has said some pretty hateful things about women and minorities. If someone called ME a criminal, or a terrorist or some shit like that, then good luck getting MY vote.
You don't have a right to murder.

If it's acceptable for you to murder an unborn child, it's equally acceptable for me to murder you. After all, all you are is a clump of cells.

Please also understand that corporate bailouts typically come from left-wing controlled governments. "Taxing the rich" also doesn't help the little guy when the wealthy just raise prices to offset their tax burden.

And why hasn't the Republican party done anything for niggers? Because the Republican party represents (in theory) Americans as a whole, not small groups. What have Democrats ever done for riot-Americans?
1994 crime bill that put them in prison?
1960s after-school programs that taught children to depend on the state rather than being self-sufficient?
1960s housing projects that re-segregated them?

Please just kill yourself. You already vote democrat, so nothing will change, you just won't be wasting oxygen.
 
Because they're low iq, impulsive, and easily lead by emotion. They're the perfect sheep and there's a reason they weren't allowed to vote in the first place.

Minorities just do it for gibs.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Grand Wizard Wakka
Back