I mean, people who are not acting pedophiles being tarred by the same brush as people who are might kinda get upset. I understand the reason behind the revulsion, of course, but that's just the natural response to it.
even if they havent molested children they are still pedophiles
When I call people who jerk off to “feral” artwork dogfuckers, I’m tarring the people who jerk off to pornographic art of dogs having sex. Nobody is being “tarred by the same brush” who doesn’t deserve it.
You sound like an absolute retard. For someone who says people get SO ANGRY OVER DRAWINGZZZ you seem the most upset here.Cope some more hypocrite purist. Poor anime drawing. Who's gonna save her?
Btw, if you want to kill someone because you believe "he is a pedophile" you are just exposing yourself as deranged and subnormal individual. Go on. Try to harm someone and you will get a broken nose.
I'm glad you can't tell the difference between fiction and reality, you might go after real child otherwise.
So you agree jerking off to drawings of children makes one a pedophile? Good to see we can agree on something!
This is literally the map vs nomap shit. Like a pedophile is a pedophile no matter if they've touched a kid or not.
reasonable take. I think there's a different thought process between the real thing, which is a violence, and a fictional 15 year old girl screaming fuck me oniichan which is why I don't think that it makes you a pedophile.
The problem with that asshole is that he always acts like you do, judging and making false allegations about people enjoying anime and that weird "loli aesthetic". He calls them pedos and shit only to prove himself as a deranged hypocrite like he alwas was. I already laugh my ass about his situation.
then you are sexually attracted to children or very childlike features, which makes you a pedophile
except "pedophile" means someone who is sexually attracted to children
I know why people do this stuff, unless they're not literal pedophiles it's because they find the concept of child sexual abuse so horrifying they'll burn anyone even remotely close to it. I think you can despise pedophiles utterly without throwing people whose only crime is watching cartoons under the bus.
except nobody has the nuance to not directly conflate someone who watches cartoons with the worst possible way that word can be used. And personally, doing so insults the victims of the pedophile by conflating a lolicon with their abuser. Like calling everyone Nazi does genuinely make Hitler seem like not such a bad guy.
Yep, but you cant just call someone a pedophile for no reason whatsoever. If people can type shit on the net its because they would never dare to call someone the p word in front of someone who likes anime. You get a broken nose. Its kinda weird seeing how little difference twitter users and kiwifarmers have.
No such thing. Lolicon and shotacon are terms with strict definitions. This is akin to saying that real CSAM is different from "childlove aesthetic" which you can enjoy innocently. It's a distinction without a difference. I can only assume that by trying to use such weaselly technicalities on me you are either hopelessly retarded or you feel threatened, and well...
Cartoons depicting what? And what are they doing while they watch these cartoons?
Looool. Do you know whats dodonpachi? Do you even play danmaku or bullet hell games? This aint even h stuff and thats an android girl made to destroy cities. Bruh. Lol. No ones getting heated but you are the one who tries to quotes my paragraph out of context like cherry picking. Hehe.
Because if you're into zoosadism or whatever what you're imaging doing is exactly the same as the fuckers who go all the way into real life. Same with scat, shitting on someone is shitting on someone. But loli by definition has to be different, because while i imagine there is literal pedo simulations most of it must be the most perfect non realistic version to get this many fans. There just aren't that many pedophiles.
