Why do we put so much stock into loli/underaged characters as a direct link to being a pedo?

Well, compare it to having rape fantasy (as rapist, not rapee).

Does it mean you're more likely to commit a rape in relative terms?
Does it mean you're likely to commit a rape in absolute terms?
Does watching rape porn make you more likely to commit a rape?
Does it mean that if you're alone with a woman, you're immediately going to rape her?
Does it mean you're fucked in the head?
Does having a rape fantasy mean you actually WANT to rape someone, or could it be restricted to fantasy?
Is there a victim?

I don't necessarily have answers for any of that, just something to consider.
 
Well, compare it to having rape fantasy (as rapist, not rapee).

Does it mean you're more likely to commit a rape in relative terms?
Does it mean you're likely to commit a rape in absolute terms?
Does watching rape porn make you more likely to commit a rape?
Does it mean that if you're alone with a woman, you're immediately going to rape her?
Does it mean you're fucked in the head?
Does having a rape fantasy mean you actually WANT to rape someone, or could it be restricted to fantasy?
Is there a victim?

I don't necessarily have answers for any of that, just something to consider.
it's a sign you're tempted
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
And btw, you anime tourist, "loli" and "shota" is a weird aesthetic where characters are portrayed as "petite". Thats why they arent necessarily children. I know people who enjoy the loli aesthetic and dont seem to pose any threat just like those weirdos who like ponies.

If you watch hentai loli stuff, you definitely are weird but calling you a pedophile is something way more serious i'd separate for true criminals who enjoy harming children and watching the real stuff.

Dont you find it funny, that all the people who claim "lolicon" is CP end up being the true degenerates who watch worse stuff? Keep projecting
Lie. Loli and shota is when pedophiles try to make kids sexy. It's not just a drawing of a retarded child you faggot. Please noose.
 
I give you that it's not normal to enjoy loli. I thought that was a given, which is why i edited my OP. I just don't think it means you must enjoy real child porn.
Why do you keep writing pedo cope threads?
Screenshot_20240216-154639.png
I remember that other thread now.
 
Do you know whats dodonpachi? Do you even play danmaku or bullet hell games?
No.
This aint even h stuff and thats an android girl made to destroy cities.
I don't care.
Btw, i dont know wtf the child love association has to do with japanese terms.
I never said anything about any association.
Btw, rebbeca, from cyberpubk edgerunners is technically a "loli aesthetic" and many like her exist.
I don't know who or what that is. Let me try Googling it.
sus.PNG
Anyways, keep crying like you do locked in your bedroom. Got stuff to do.
Alright, I'm fine with ending this here as well. It's clear you have no interest in an actual discussion as you've been deflecting, projecting and downplaying as much as you possibly can. Until you post an image like the ones from Vaush's loli folder (the type of art "lolicon" actually refers to) and are able to properly, reasonably defend it as non-pedophilic, I have nothing else to say to you.
Because if you're into zoosadism or whatever what you're imaging doing is exactly the same as the fuckers who go all the way into real life. Same with scat, shitting on someone is shitting on someone. But loli by definition has to be different, because while i imagine there is literal pedo simulations most of it must be the most perfect non realistic version to get this many fans.
You're either so retarded you've been gaslit into genuinely believing that there are people who can consume artwork of little girls being raped with no sexual intent, or you're being intentionally obtuse. At this point, I can't tell the difference.
There just aren't that many pedophiles.
Do you use the same site that I do? Unfortunately, there aren't enough rainbows in the world for this statement.
 
Alright, I'm fine with ending this here as well. It's clear you have no interest in an actual discussion as you've been deflecting, projecting and downplaying as much as you possibly can. Until you post an image like the ones from Vaush's loli folder (the type of art "lolicon" actually refers to) and are able to properly, reasonably defend it as non-pedophilic, I have nothing else to say to you.
I've got nothing better to do for the next little bit, I'll play devil's advocate because it might be amusing.

I'll start with the argument that all art, from the sublime to the subversive; unlike objective or organic subjects, have a pregnant meaning or underlying theme to them.
In the case of Vaush's loli horsefucker images, one could argue that they represent the naivety of innocence being confronted and challenged and subjugated to the obligations of maturity that are often times out of our control, and this loss of control can feel like an invasion into our own plans, or desires, or wishes in life, yet we're required to stoically submit our Will to those things which are out of our own control;
Where the inverse of this, Vaush's horse-fucking loli, who resists the influence of the world around the subject and mounts those obligations, and thus takes back power and control over the trajectory of the individual's own destiny; a sort of "grabbing the bull by the horns" (or the horse by the cock) and steering one's own ship and plotting one's own course through life, despite the discomfort and personal inconveniences that go alone with that, the act of civilization taming the wilderness and robbing it of it's vitality, and subordinating those chaotic elements to the will of the subject.

How's that for an argument that depornographies/desexualizes the material.
 
Last edited:
This retard idiot called @Super Dilator Duel 3D is trying so hard to prove me as a p its so hilarious

That's the thing. you are a tourist. you have no actual knowledge about wtf you are talking. lol

I don't care.
Yes you do. You wanted to see if i was a p. nice try, fag
never said anything about any association.
"Child love". Keep yapping
I don't know who or what that is. Let me try Googling it.
Yep. she is an adult with transhumanist modifications. That's what happens when you don't even know what you are talking about. the first thing you see the first thing you say: "PEDOOO"
Alright, I'm fine with ending this here as well. It's clear you have no interest in an actual discussion as you've been deflecting, projecting and downplaying as much as you possibly can. Until you post an image like the ones from Vaush's loli folder (the type of art "lolicon" actually refers to) and are able to properly, reasonably defend it as non-pedophilic, I have nothing else to say to you.
You have nothing to say, because vaush is massive hypocrite like you. lol. You never even responded to any of my arguments, but thats ok. KF is filled with twitter mentally online users like you. You are even hoping i post trash like vaush. lol. I can even sense the REEE inside you. Nice try, buddy.

Here, traumatized individual: LOLI SCREAM! Bye bye. Not gonna read any cope. i had my fun here.

1708129425393.png
 
This retard idiot called @Super Dilator Duel 3D is trying so hard to prove me as a p its so hilarious


That's the thing. you are a tourist. you have no actual knowledge about wtf you are talking. lol


Yes you do. You wanted to see if i was a p. nice try, fag

"Child love". Keep yapping

Yep. she is an adult with transhumanist modifications. That's what happens when you don't even know what you are talking about. the first thing you see the first thing you say: "PEDOOO"

You have nothing to say, because vaush is massive hypocrite like you. lol. You never even responded to any of my arguments, but thats ok. KF is filled with twitter mentally online users like you. You are even hoping i post trash like vaush. lol. I can even sense the REEE inside you. Nice try, buddy.

Here, traumatized individual: LOLI SCREAM! Bye bye. Not gonna read any cope. i had my fun here.

View attachment 5728997
Just say “pedophile” you nigger faggot, this isn't Twitter or Youtube.
 
No, I think this is a situation that necessitates zero nuance. Loli quite literally is pedoshit, and only within the past decade has anyone tried "de-sexualizing" it for the "masses". No, it's not the same as simply consuming media where the characters are children, because South Park is not for children. Using the term "Loli" to identify an anime girl exudes pedo vibes from the getgo. Do you even know where the term Lolita comes from?

Sometimes things are as they appear.
 
it's a sign you're tempted
Possibly. So what are the implications of that?

Even in most morally hardcore religions, where God knows your every thought, people aren't normally punished merely for being tempted. People are tempted to do horrible things all the time. So are we in thought crime territory now? Do we make an exception for certain types of thoughts because they're so uniquely evil?
 
Possibly. So what are the implications of that?

Even in most morally hardcore religions, where God knows your every thought, people aren't normally punished merely for being tempted. People are tempted to do horrible things all the time. So are we in thought crime territory now? Do we make an exception for certain types of thoughts because they're so uniquely evil?
Like I said earlier, I think people thought crime lolicons because they are so desperate to protect real life children. I understand that. And despite being untrained i would do everything I could to stop a child rapist. You don't need to beat people into submission who like cartoons (of underage characters being fucked) to be a good child defender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RurkerHivemind
View attachment 5728990
Yes it is just a retarded drawing in the image of a sexy child, and so what?,where is the harm?, point me to the kid, the victim, bruised battered with bleeding genitals and a giant trauma because of what that kid has suffered.......Oh there is none, no victim, no harm to anyone. Fucking retards always going apeshit over the most moronic stuff that doesnt even matter. In our schools this curriculum for the first time kids learn how to fellate and masturbate at the age of 8 years old, springtime or something the learning material is called. Shouldn't you be there with your noose?.
Woah woah, you read BDSM RAPE Loli porn? Holy fuck bro. What ever happened to of age women with boobs in missionary?? Holy Fuck
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kiwisee
Possibly. So what are the implications of that?

Even in most morally hardcore religions, where God knows your every thought, people aren't normally punished merely for being tempted. People are tempted to do horrible things all the time. So are we in thought crime territory now? Do we make an exception for certain types of thoughts because they're so uniquely evil?
If you think about fucking little boys or girls, anyone with sense doesn't want you breathing the same air as them
 
gonna be honest i did not expect this many people to be on my side. again, pardon my ignorance, I thought most people agree with Null's "All lolicons are pedos" bit.
I think there's a mistake there, Being a lolicon is quite a bit different as the intent is to focus on child like characters, that's where I have a hard time believing the person isn't a pedo. If they're self-identifying that sounds even worse. Someone looking at furry porn or hentai isn't instantly a furry, someone calling themselves a furry and obsessed with it, well it doesn't look good such as in the accusation of zoophile/beastiality. Same too I would argue in this accusation.

I think there's a clear distinction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RurkerHivemind
Back