Why does the holocaust get special importance over other genocides

MajinGoku

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 15, 2024
10 million iranians were killed by the british in ww1 and no one gives a shit. millions of people in the congo were killed by the belgians and there are 0 movies about it. But every other year we get a movie on the horrors of the holcaust and every one pretends it was the only crime against humanity ignoring every other genocide.
 
GEEEEEE, I ponder that question also...
ab84d09f174d807be86cfc28e669e7f08a2c6d9553ebe28cf52611f246093824.jpg

"Lol kike media" - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1970).
 
gee i wonder who controls the media and entertainment and is aggresively pushing that shit everywhere they go? Wanna know why we dont hear much about some sandnigger getting genocided by another group of sandnigger? Because sandniggers arent in control of shit except for in their shitty plot of sand soaked in blood for thousand of years.
 
"Because fuck you and how dare you question the six gorillion, goy! Nobody has EVER suffered as much as jews and DON'T YOU FUCKING FORGET IT! Now get on your knees and fork over another $10 billion shekels or we'll make sure your life is ruined!"

Or something like that...
 
For a serious answer beyond just "Because Jews":

Most genocides happen within a country. Holodomor was concentrated in Ukraine. The Armenian genocide within the dying Ottoman Empire (may it rest in piss), etc etc.

The Holocaust was unique in the sense that it was an "international" event, happening in France, Germany, Italy, Poland, etc, alongside WW2. Going around invading countries, and exterminating segments of it, in an era where mass media was growing, would get you a lot of attention.
 
If it weren't for the fact that Hitler was on the losing side of WWII, none of the allied countries would have given two fucks about the holocaust. Even the Soviet Union eventually committed large-scale atrocities against the jews, leftists seldom talk about THAT. Nor do they talk about the fact that antisemitism is the logical conclusion of any ideology that espouses identity politics or professes to be violently anti-capitalist, wokeism included.

It's quite easy to harshly condemn the country that started history's deadliest conflict, and the entire world would never hear the end of the stories about the atrocities that country committed. Even the genocides and atrocities that Imperial Japan committed are not talked about as often, but even leftists are more willing to talk about Japanese atrocities than those committed by the Ottoman empire, the Soviet Union, or even earlier examples like the Assyrian empire or the small-scale genocides that the American injuns committed against each other.
 
Last edited:
gee i wonder who controls the media and entertainment and is aggresively pushing that shit everywhere they go? Wanna know why we dont hear much about some sandnigger getting genocided by another group of sandnigger? Because sandniggers arent in control of shit except for in their shitty plot of sand soaked in blood for thousand of years.

There it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smar Mijou
Get a drink, put on some nice music, get comfortable, and read Ron Unz:


Yet in the case of the Holocaust, this pattern was completely reversed. Hardly anyone discussed it for the first twenty years after the end of the World War II, while it gradually moved to the center of American life in the 1970s, just as wartime memories were fading and many of the most prominent and knowledgeable figures from that era had departed the scene. Novick cites numerous studies and surveys demonstrating that this lack of interest and visibility certainly included the Jewish community itself, which had seemingly suffered so greatly under those events, yet apparently had almost completely forgotten about them during the 1950s and much of the 1960s.

I can certainly confirm that impression from my personal experience. Prior to the mid- or late-1970s, I had had only the vaguest impression that virtually all the Jews and Gypsies of Europe had been exterminated during the Second World War, and although the term “Holocaust” was in widespread use, it invariably referred to a “Nuclear Holocaust,” a term long-since supplanted and scarcely used today. Then, after the Berlin Wall fell, I was quite surprised to discover that Eastern Europe was still filled with vast numbers of unexterminated Gypsies, who quickly flooded into the West and provoked all sorts of political controversies.
 
is this like the civil war thing where the most simplistic answer is “the jews”, and then you start doing research and the answer becomes more complex, and then finally when you have an advanced understanding of the topic it flips back to “no, it really is just that jews control your life from the shadows“?

it kinda feels like that might be the route you go down if you spend enough time looking into this
 
Some suggested reading:

Norman Finkelstein's Holocaust Industry. That book pissed off the yids so much Alan Dershowitz led a campaign to deny Finkelstein denial of tenure.

Walt and Mearsheimer the Israeli Lobby,

Kevin MacDonald The Culture of Critique.

Did you know the Bolshevik Revolution was financed by a Jewish financier named Jacob Schiff? Also look into the Balfour declaration, a quid pro quo where Britain assured American Jewish financiers Palestine as a zionist homeland if they would help the United States get in the war.

Jean Marie Le Pan said it best--the Holocaust is a mere detail in history.
 
Back