- Joined
- Jul 27, 2017
Another thread where snailslime argues in bad faith and predictably smug passive-aggressive jabs with others reacting accordingly.
Will you people ever learn?
Will you people ever learn?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm maybe American niggers need to go classical instead of modern. Modern is shit.People want to be part of a 'community' not just a globo-, cosmopolitan citizen of the world, consumer. Why are all Hallmark movies about some stressed out boss bitch who does it all and is strong and independent but then finds true love in some man who's 'not like the other men'? Theyre speaking to an audience.
And I agree with the above post, it is about selling shit, in a certain way--and artists do want to make money. Its compartmentalization and shorthand of experiences; you can make art that anyone can relate too but it's far more impactful if someone relates to it or likes it or engages with it more than just looking at it and moving on. Stephanie Meyers for instance, JK Rowling, made billions selling a benign experience that teenagers and young adults relate to.
You have galleries full of classic works that most people see as boring and benign because even if theyre technically fascinating and were meant to be impactful. You could show people a gallery full of like Ukiyo-e woodblock prints and those were pretty influential, The Great Wave of Kanegawa is an iconic print, but it doesnt mean much to people but then you have guys like Takashi Murakami who makes weird anime pop art and its more modern and relatable to people or people relate things together, they know the figures, shit like that, and whether you like his art or not, hes pretty famous and a successful artist.
Well if youre going to critique art and bring shit like that in it, these two statues are two totally different things and you can separate the meaning of the artist and influence of the artist and say I like one over the other but the first one is an African artist almost emulating those old neoclassical sculptures of powerful people, and the other is an American artist making a callback to centuries old tribal, precolonial sculptures or ritual figurines (although I dont think any one in particular). I dont know why its got lions as Fu dogs though.
Context, scale and placement and shit matter too. The top one is a large statue made of probably expensive materials and if you told me it was at a place where some famous figure was born or some city hall or something, Id believe it. A statue like that in Africa is probably quite novel or at least carries more weight than it would in America where its just 'Oh another statue of some guy' and you just pass it. The bottom one is depicting something more stylized and maybe ritualistic, primitive, and if you told me it was in the courtyard of the Smithsonian or something, Id go 'Sure yeah theyd have something like that', its novel in America. And in a world where AI can now just generate 'classical' art, AI portraits, realist works, like Leonid Afremov or Thomas Kinkade shit, you have a bunch of people who find the weird, niche, highly 'cultural' shit to be more appealing.
Hell even Piss Christ could be argued in favor of being Spanish art connected to the culture, viewed through the lens of Spanish Catholicism.
If you wanted to get real pretentious about it you could argue that the elongated head is probably symbolism but partly may have been a deliberate choice so that the statue doesnt get swallowed up in scale by the tall buildings around it. If you took the scale and subject of the top sculpture and kept everything the same, but placed it in the courtyard in the bottom image, it would look and feel more like the Fountain of the Four Rivers in Rome, youd imagine there to be a small pool or something on that concrete slab with people coming up and throwing pennies in or something.
You're contradicting yourself there.horrible, patriarchal, fascist and racist
At this rate, I'm blaming you faggots more. Everyone knows snailslime is a retarded contrarian libtard whore but you keep replying to her. Her troll fu isn't even that strong; she's Dynastia minus the funny.Blame @snailslime. Her baby daddy is in prison at the moment so she's lashing out in this thread.
Did they just come up with their own esoteric race cult already?They had a display up by a modern Black woman artist, semi-abstract paintings of Black women/girls, with the theme being something about Black women being God or something.
Nigger enabler detected.I wonder how many of the people here going "Niggers can't do creative works!" have done anything themselves worth a shit....
Yes, it's called "Black Hebrew Israelites". Literally "WE WUZ KANGZ!", mixed with "WE WUZ DA TRU ARYANZ!" as well.Did they just come up with their own esoteric race cult already?
This is false.Blacks can only mimic and retard what they see and are not capable of the abstract thought process required for original art
Who do you think Elvis and all the brilliant early white rock musicians were influenced by?This is why in the same time it took rock music to change from Elvis Presley to Nirvana rap is still the same NWA nigger bullshit it was 30 years ago today.
Why, Wagner of course! Delta blues wasn't ever a thing, silly goose!Who do you think Elvis and all the brilliant early white rock musicians were influenced by?