Why is black art so limited in scope? - No, I’m not saying black people suck.

Please forgive us for insulting the artistic merit of "Bix Nood in da Hood", blacked.com, and mud huts
Ironic
5463459beae6233eccf964278ae948cd53c4845f75adc76e068245ca80733c8d.png
 
One is an example of stately, empirical architecture and the other is an example of practical, mediaeval accomodation.

All that picture proves is that you are an even bigger cunt than what you’ve so far expressed within the preceeding 5 pages of this thread.
 
????
The greeks weren't black, but i understand if your Netflix and Showtime documentaries told you otherwise.
oh, the mali empire certainly was black
980dec_ecf3290798f6407485d2b396fcc9e324_mv2.jpg

1noarFYqcN3Jo4AtbwzkVmjx.jpg

One is an example of stately, empirical architecture and the other is an example of practical, mediaeval accomodation.

All that picture proves is that you are an even bigger cunt than what you’ve so far expressed within the preceeding 5 pages of this thread.
oh no, i'm a cunt
 
Decades and decades of the government dumbing them down and convincing them they can only do generic race-related art. Black blues guys, Delta blues music, etc. of the late 1800s/early 1900s were largely great. Now it's all just "nigga nigga nigga" rap, retarded mumble rap, or shitty big-lipped afro'd art pieces because they've been told it's all they're capable of.
 
Back