🐱 Why You Shouldn’t Use Kiwi Farms To Source Callouts

CatParty
https://medium.com/@ynceiche/why-you-shouldnt-use-kiwi-farms-to-source-callouts-52df2aabbf62
https://archive.li/yzefw

Online predators are currently an unfortunate fact of the internet, and those who are well-known and popular do sometimes end up getting exposed. In internet callouts across many social media platforms, there’s one source of information that’s a constant: Kiwi Farms. A lot of people will defend the use of this forum as a source, despite the glaringly obvious ableism, transphobia, homophobia, and… listen, listing every shitty thing they say or do would take up this entire article. So I’m not going to.
I’m also not going to try to provide a psychological profile of a typical member, or generalize them all as sad white guy basement dwellers. That kind of writing, while fun and sometimes illuminating, can also be stomped on by one person saying “well, I don’t fit that exact stereotype, so what I do is totally different than what this writer is talking about”. I really don’t know who most of the Farmers are, due to their inclination to “hide their powerlevel” and avoid revealing personal information. Ultimately, who they are in the context of callout culture at large is what they do, and that’s not something too difficult to figure out.
I’m worried about the concept that the primary purpose of Kiwi Farms is to unmask predators, because it’s not and never has been. Maybe there are some crusaders on the site who genuinely care about safety and morality, but they’d be working against the grain of the site and its intended use. KF began as an extension of a wiki that cataloged the doings and foibles of one singular person, Christine Weston Chandler, better known by the abbreviation CWC.
She is still a major feature of Kiwi Farms’ forums, although it seems that targeted harassment against her has died down. A lot of Christine’s behavior is strange and inappropriate, but she’s clearly not dangerous and has a very limited sphere of actual personal influence. She’s a trans woman with a mental disability who lives at home and makes fanart. There’s no moral imperative to make fun of her or provide her personal information to the internet at large. The people at Kiwi Farms do so because they find it funny. This is reflected in their treatment of everyone they write about.
I understand that sometimes, on behalf of the victims of genuinely harmful people, Kiwi Farms is used as a source not out of approval, but out of a perceived necessity. The problem I have with this is that Kiwi Farms is a forum for making fun of “LOLcows”, not a journalistic outlet. They’re not under any obligation to engage in balanced reporting, verify what they post, or apply any sort of hierarchy whatsoever to the information they provide.
One effect that using Kiwi Farms as a source has on callout culture is to “flatten out” the severity of accusations and offenses. To find useful information on dangerous people, you have to wade through useless, bigoted humor and extensive discussions of petty bullshit that simply isn’t on the same level. A thread can contain an equal amount of information on its subject’s pedophilia and bad behavior in a Pokemon roleplay. Someone who has their address revealed might be an animal abuser, and might be a person who just makes a comic about being transgender.
Something else worth noting is that LGBT people, especially trans women, are the site’s bread and butter when it comes to public mockery. KF does discuss a number of other topics, including MRAs and cosplay drama, but it disproportionately focuses on marginalized groups. Even when the allegations are completely accurate, a much harsher light is shined on marginalized creators and public figures. These are not, in general, people in positions of power.
Screw-ups that would never stick to bona fide celebrities somehow end up dogging small-time queer artists for years. It’s not a coincidence that these are the easiest targets, and it’s not right to endorse a system of accountability that constantly knocks down people who simply cannot afford to take those hits, and leaves more successful, protected creators unquestioned.
Victims of abuse and people who have uncovered scams are starting to come forward on Kiwi Farms, which is not great first of all because (as I said earlier) there aren’t a lot of protections in place to ensure that they’re not bullshitting or only revealing some of the truth. And there never will be, because that simply isn’t what KF is all about.
I also don’t want people not affiliated with that forum or their goals to have to deal with the intentionally upsetting, obnoxious content on the Farms just to get their message out. When Kiwi Farms is accepted as a source, that enhances the credibility of a website that spends most of its time and energy insulting people, digging through their old internet posts, and revealing their home addresses for no special reason. Well, other than that they can and it’s fun for them. When Kiwi Farms does reveal abusers, scammers, and harassers for what they are, it’s as a side effect.
So, what should people do about it? Targeting the site itself with DMCAs, legal threats, and doxxing of its members doesn’t seem to do much, if anything. The man behind the website explains that “I am an insane person on the Internet with no assets. There is nothing you can take from me,” and he’s… not wrong. First of all, as a community we can speak up about predators on other platforms if at all possible, because KF is not an appropriate one and doesn’t even really claim to be.
We can also attempt to find other ways to verify information outside of Kiwi Farms, and not immediately take information found there at face value. Lastly, we can forgive vulnerable people for lesser offenses and allow room for them to grow and change, instead of periodically dogpiling on folks for things that aren’t actually unforgivable. Or, y’know, we could continue to support via inaction a platform with the sole mission of pointing and laughing. Whatever.
 
841ac100-5d57-41fc-af2f-242c01ef2528.png
 
They’re not under any obligation to engage in balanced reporting, verify what they post, or apply any sort of hierarchy whatsoever to the information they provide.

So we're basically Buzzfeed, except that we do it for the lulz rather than for hot pockets. Though I honestly haven't a clue what this supposed "hierarchy" would involve
 
What the "journalist" fails to take into account

Medium makes it pretty easy for any content on it to look 'professional' and 'journalistic' purely by the website's appearance alone. There's no vetting process at all. It's more like a really fancy blog, however people treat 'articles' up on the website as though they've been vetted. It's pretty unfortunate, to say the least. There was even an 'article' on Medium that was circulating on twitter a while back that specifically warned against treating Medium as though it was a 'serious' journalism website.
 
There’s no moral imperative to make fun of her

I found this very telling. So some people deserve mockery - to be properly moral there's an imperative to do so, even. But they have to be approved targets. People I think deserve it. A lovely little nugget of 'it's OK when we do it - not just OK, a moral imperative'.

Also, the one thing the Farms does is try and verify information. People can and do draw incorrect conclusions from the information at hand, but gathering those links and posts and knowledge and archiving it is one of the key mission statements. There's a lot you can say about KiwiFarms, but the site is built on quotes from the lolcows themselves. This article got too close to the 'you said a slur, so all your information is a lie' argument for my liking.
 
Not gonna lie, I got to half-mast reading OP's write-up. "These folks are powerful, they deeply affect the lives of people I care about online, and there's absolutely nothing that can be done to stop them."

If the goal was to make me feel like a feared member of Batman's gallery of rogues, you've succeeded.
 
A lot of Christine’s behavior is strange and inappropriate, but she’s clearly not dangerous
Fake news. Chris’s upcoming trial for his latest arrest would beg to differ.

As far as articles about KF go it’s better written than the K-farmer article (but less charming) but is in between that and other articles in understanding what the site is for. Usually they just say “reee transphobia” without also acknowledging our excellent threads on incels and nice guys.
 
I found this very telling. So some people deserve mockery - to be properly moral there's an imperative to do so, even. But they have to be approved targets. People I think deserve it. A lovely little nugget of 'it's OK when we do it - not just OK, a moral imperative'.

Also, the one thing the Farms does is try and verify information. People can and do draw incorrect conclusions from the information at hand, but gathering those links and posts and knowledge and archiving it is one of the key mission statements. There's a lot you can say about KiwiFarms, but the site is built on quotes from the lolcows themselves. This article got too close to the 'you said a slur, so all your information is a lie' argument for my liking.

Not to mention at the end of the day, we make it clear we are not the gospel on anyone, we just want a laugh, accurately shitting on a POS is just a nice bonus.

Doesn't mean we always get the latter right, and sometimes we don't, but since that's not the point, the amusement is, we aren't worthy of being considered trustworthy, but the fact we are enough to the point it generates more amusement just makes the comedy better IMO.
 
So we're basically Buzzfeed, except that we do it for the lulz rather than for hot pockets. Though I honestly haven't a clue what this supposed "hierarchy" would involve
I think it refers to how we go off on Pokemon competitive meta tangents in the middle of roasting furries, and this is somehow disorganized on our part & a failure to moderate?

I took a closer look at OP's link and noticed it only had one like/follow/clap on Medium, looking into it a little deeper...
upload_2018-4-11_10-52-53.png
 
Something else worth noting is that LGBT people, especially trans women, are the site’s bread and butter when it comes to public mockery. KF does discuss a number of other topics, including MRAs and cosplay drama, but it disproportionately focuses on marginalized groups. Even when the allegations are completely accurate, a much harsher light is shined on marginalized creators and public figures. These are not, in general, people in positions of power.
Screw-ups that would never stick to bona fide celebrities somehow end up dogging small-time queer artists for years. It’s not a coincidence that these are the easiest targets, and it’s not right to endorse a system of accountability that constantly knocks down people who simply cannot afford to take those hits, and leaves more successful, protected creators unquestioned.
...
Lastly, we can forgive vulnerable people for lesser offenses and allow room for them to grow and change, instead of periodically dogpiling on folks for things that aren’t actually unforgivable.
The hypocrisy has become expected, but it's still frustrating. Everyone should be able to be ridiculed, and pretending otherwise just makes it seems like you're protecting those groups because they're lesser and can't take it.

I took a closer look at OP's link and noticed it only had one like/follow/clap on Medium, looking into it a little deeper...
View attachment 424573
>she's likely still in high school so we can't make fun of her yet
S U F F E R I N G
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-11_11-11-0.png
    upload_2018-4-11_11-11-0.png
    317.4 KB · Views: 261
Last edited:
This is all hypocritical bullshit anyway. Sitting around writing think pieces about how you're better than the people who sit around writing forum posts about how they're better than other people doesn't actually win you the Morally Superior award. Half the internet that isn't porn is people writing judgey shit about each other for fun and attention. At least people here are honest about why they're here.
 
Not gonna lie, I got to half-mast reading OP's write-up. "These folks are powerful, they deeply affect the lives of people I care about online, and there's absolutely nothing that can be done to stop them."

If the goal was to make me feel like a feared member of Batman's gallery of rogues, you've succeeded.

We truly are the :autism: illuminati.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
I couldn't read past "CWC clearly isn't dangerous". Macing people and hitting them with your car is harm. It's not something that can be argued with, he has harmed people.

It's also pretty clear he wishes to harm people that displease him, through his long track record of tantrums and thinly-disguised pastiches of his enemies getting their "just deserts" in his comics and whatnot.

He'd be an even more violent person if it weren't for his self-inflicted lack of agency in that department, and being a fat lazy fucker too.

I'm guessing he's got more court apperances under his belt than any random 5 Kiwis you can select off the member list here, so much for the "not dangerous" , but they'd just whine "Muh trans oppression" if you pointed that out.
 
So we're basically Buzzfeed, except that we do it for the lulz rather than for hot pockets. Though I honestly haven't a clue what this supposed "hierarchy" would involve

In reality, we're just as valid as any other source that should be taken seriously. People here probably value evidence just as much as professional historians.
 
Back