Wikia / FANDOM - The ugly result of giving aspies control of their own wiki websites

I found this gem on a Candy Land wiki of all wikis.
Screenshot_20220324-080231_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another month has gone by and things are largely the same, in the sense that some kid doesn't know what "no contact" actually means. Might as well look into it...

And as you'd expect, he's in denial over what qualifies as harassment and is trying to get even with those who wronged him.

Some more whining from him.

And here's some whining on the Disney wiki.

And this isn't just one kid doing it; here's someone else whining to him because these kids get an persecution complex when they get banned.

And I would say it's weird that all of this drama is coming from the Idea Wiki and it's clones; but considering how the Ballad of Nate Spidgewood goes, it's kind of hard to feel anything about it.
 
Last edited:
Sorry if this has been brought up before, but the One Piece wiki has gone full woke. They refer to Yamato as a male now and have this little tidbit at the end of the article:

View attachment 3426851

Never mind that Oda has confirmed she's canonically a woman.
Oh, that nonsense will never end.

If you check the talk page, you should see that they were holding an vote until the site's admins butted in and said that "Yamato is trans"

I've posted about it in this thread, last year. Can't say that I've archived it, though.
 
Last edited:
Oh, that nonsense will never end.

If you check the talk page, you should see that they were holding an vote until the site's admins butted in and said that "Yamato is trans"

I've posted about it in this thread, last year. Can't say that I've archived it, though.
That sucks. Thanks for sharing! I used to love browsing that wiki, but now the admins have politicized and ruined it.
 
Sorry if this has been brought up before, but the One Piece wiki has gone full woke. They refer to Yamato as a male now and have this little tidbit at the end of the article:

View attachment 3426851

Never mind that Oda has confirmed she's canonically a woman.
That retardation has been going on for years with no signs of stopping.
 
Yeah it was the fandom staff that overrode the wiki mods:

1656205764840.png


What these people don't understand is, if the creator of the content says she's a woman, then she's a woman; all other interpretations cease to be valid (not like they'd know the meaning of that word anyway). They really only have two arguments to make from there: either Oda is wrong and Yamato is a man, or some stupid fucking prescriptive argument about how drawings don't have a sex. In the case of the former, they use tidbits of evidence such as Yamato taking on male stereotypes. The problem with that is that it doesn't mean she sees herself as male--which is another can of worms regarding the insanity of gender theory--but rather wants the same privileges and freedom that males are typically allotted. It doesn't take much critical thinking to look at the context either. When Kin'emon met Nami and co. at Punk Hazard he was, as Nami put it, a chauvinistic pig. Because that's how backwards Wano is, and other nations in One Piece aren't so backwards. Does that make Nami a man by Wano's standards? Does Chopper still believe she is after she lied about it during Thriller Bark? It beckons the question a lot of trannies can't answer, that once rigid sex role stereotyping lightens up and both sexes are allowed more freedom of expression, then wouldn't it erase transgenderism entirely? They have to argue from a place of severe misogyny to say that a woman not conforming to stereotypes = male. In the latter's case, they never actually apply the argument to anything else. Like trees or rocks. But objects serve a purpose in a story, and what they're meant to represent is important for description and internal logic.
 
Yeah it was the fandom staff that overrode the wiki mods:

View attachment 3426957

What these people don't understand is, if the creator of the content says she's a woman, then she's a woman; all other interpretations cease to be valid (not like they'd know the meaning of that word anyway). They really only have two arguments to make from there: either Oda is wrong and Yamato is a man, or some stupid fucking prescriptive argument about how drawings don't have a sex. In the case of the former, they use tidbits of evidence such as Yamato taking on male stereotypes. The problem with that is that it doesn't mean she sees herself as male--which is another can of worms regarding the insanity of gender theory--but rather wants the same privileges and freedom that males are typically allotted. It doesn't take much critical thinking to look at the context either. When Kin'emon met Nami and co. at Punk Hazard he was, as Nami put it, a chauvinistic pig. Because that's how backwards Wano is, and other nations in One Piece aren't so backwards. Does that make Nami a man by Wano's standards? Does Chopper still believe she is after she lied about it during Thriller Bark? It beckons the question a lot of trannies can't answer, that once rigid sex role stereotyping lightens up and both sexes are allowed more freedom of expression, then wouldn't it erase transgenderism entirely? They have to argue from a place of severe misogyny to say that a woman not conforming to stereotypes = male. In the latter's case, they never actually apply the argument to anything else. Like trees or rocks. But objects serve a purpose in a story, and what they're meant to represent is important for description and internal logic.
Ah man, who would do something like this?
anime feminist guy.png

shit articles.png
Oh, he works for AnimeFeminist. Literally everything makes sense now.
How do these faggots keep getting into positions of power when they don't fit in with the fanbase and everyone hates them? That NMH article he wrote is basically just him seething about not fitting in with other people who like anime and bitching about the "alt-right" while virtue signaling about all kind of other dumb shit all while misreading a great game.

I like how on the poll discussion page, he basically goes "We have LGBTQP+ people at the top so democracy regarding grey areas like this doesn't matter, I'm just going to overrule everyone because we literally built my political beliefs into the community guidelines of the website"
LGBT Wiki.png
Basically all of FANDOM is cucked and if you want to have an apolitical wiki then they will literally come in and force you to comply with their tranny bullshit the second they have an excuse to. I mean, I looked at the staff who run the OP Wiki and the vast majority of them seemed like normal anime fans who didn't care about politics. Some had pronoun bios in linked twitters and I found this one faggot who talked about getting banned from TVTropes for disagreeing with "chuds" but that one was an outlier. These people bitch about colonialism but force their beliefs and habits on everyone literally everywhere they go.
 
Miraheze would probably be the closest analogue. And you could always just rent some web space and run your own instance of MediaWiki or whatever if you're technically inclined.
Miraheze is full of the same kind of retards you'd find on FANDOM. Just be a big boy and host your own wiki.
 
Dumb question, but are there any alternatives to Fandom? Unless they have a monopoly on the wiki "market."
There really is no alternative to a lot of places that have been taken over by these insane people, there's a market for it but it'd still be hard to get off the ground plus they already have all of the workers and resources. Like, I'd love for an apolitical alternative to AnimeNewsNetwork to come along but truth be told, nobody could probably compete with them even with a relatively large budget because they already have a lot of ties to the industry on top of a lot of very well-read and experienced staff despite whatever you might think of them.
 
And you could always just rent some web space and run your own instance of MediaWiki or whatever if you're technically inclined.
I can only recommend this enough. Even if you prefer the "convenience" of Wikia, there are several other things I have encountered through personal experience that make owning and operating your own Wiki that much better and rewarding than relying on Cuckdom. I'll elaborate if there's sufficient interest, including namedropping some of the website's biggest offenders.
 
Found some interesting drama over at the Turtlepedia concerning one of its most prominent editors for the last 9 years, a 42 year old genderfluid weirdo and self-proclaimed gaymer with a lot mental issues and insecurities who was banned last year after he had a complete mental breakdown and started harassing users and making idiotic edits. His most notable contributions aside from excessive perfectionism was putting more focus on the LGBTQ elements and "discrimination" present in a dumb turtle franchise for kids while also finding ways to insert his homoerotic fanfiction into articles as fact for the last decade.

https://turtlepedia.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Gilgameshkun
He claims his real name is Dermot Mac Flannchaidh and googling it will unsurprisingly lead you to plenty of cringy furry and other weird fetish accounts all with the same profile headers.
1657820259425.png
 
Back