He edited his article to include this
(archive)
View attachment 1245321
So is this ordeal done with?
No. (archive) Billy proceeds to claim that DA is lying because they're apparently not
explicitly banning content, but rather taking various content due to DMCA, and then citing an incident where a random user got a 4 year old picture of theirs taken down because it apparently contained a "seuxalized minor", even though the artist claims that it was depicted as an adult
https://twitter.com/TheGoldenSmurf/status/1243676146488705025 (archive)
Comments from the OAG article aren't full blown exceptional, but still dumb.
EDIT: Direct quote from OAG reader after being told that his site is shit