King is at his best in the short form. His novels are maybe 60/40 hit or miss in overall quality, but his short stories have a much higher ratio of quality.
This is partly why his short stories are usually better, because he doesn't have the time to bog himself down with drawn out endings or back and forth conflicts. In his novels, the best ones are about human dread and misery, where the conflict is more abstract and the ending more open. From a Buick 8 is a great example of this, where his strength in building atmosphere and characterization can be emphasized.
HARD AGREE. I have
Four Past Midnight,
Everything's Eventual,
Hearts in Atlantis, and
Nightmares and Dreamscapes. When he limits his sperging, I truly enjoy it.
Langoliers is great as a novella. Not too long, plus I was entertaining myself trying to see if the passed out drunk passenger would be orphaned, and... King did NOT forget about him! Surprised for a guy on Coke and Alcohol. He must use outlines or a whiteboard to get everything straight. Which reminds me...
I've got an early edition of
The Gunslinger. In his own commentary after, he rips on people who use outlines and calls them hacks. Talk about a man who truly sounded like he's lost his own way after getting famous. I was disappointed.
The Gunslinger is good, but not his best. Can't bring myself to start
The Drawing of the Three.
Just added
From a Buick 8 and
Cell to my library the other day (thrift stores!) Not sure when I'll start on them since I'm reading Clive Barker's
Abarat first book right now.
Worst short stories for me:
*
You Know They Got a Hell of a Band (needs a bit of improvement)
*
It Grows on You
*
Popsy
*
Riding the Bullet
*
Little Sisters of Eluria
Best short stories:
*
Dylan's Cadillac
*
Crouch End
*
1408
*
Rainy Season
*
Langoliers
Of course, I've always wondered just what King really thought about Mr. Toomey. He oscillates between liking/feeling sorry for him to outright hating the character, but I couldn't get a gage on just why that seemed to be. Sometimes I got a sense that he was bored with his own story (could happen a lot), but his editor either didn't catch on or didn't care.
Someone mentioned Bachman. I have
The Regulators.
Not. The. Greatest.
There was too much epistlatory stuff between the chapters. Tak was just nonsensical in his machinations and too underdeveloped. King has some kind of magical nigger fascination with autism and retarded kids all while writing them as being more unhygienic and disgusting as Chantal Sarault--for no functional reason.
The story leaves you with more questions than answers, like... if the lady who adopted her brother's tard kid LOVED her husband, why don't they end up together? Why doesn't the tard kid end up with his real family? Why does the tard kid end up in his aunt's fantasy land when he was so absorbed in watching
The Regulators and that irritating cartoon show?
I heard
Rose Madder is pretty awful too.