Worst of Stephen King - Worst books or stories

Worst story collections

  • The Bazaar of Bad Dreams

    Votes: 15 10.5%
  • Different Seasons

    Votes: 5 3.5%
  • Everything's Eventual

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Four Past Midnight

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Full Dark, No Stars

    Votes: 10 7.0%
  • Hearts in Atlantis

    Votes: 55 38.5%
  • If It Bleeds

    Votes: 13 9.1%
  • Just After Sunset

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • Night Shift

    Votes: 10 7.0%
  • Nightmares & Dreamscapes

    Votes: 7 4.9%
  • Skeleton Crew

    Votes: 7 4.9%

  • Total voters
    143
His decades of success are baffling to me. Occasionally good premises but terrible execution, terrible writing, shallow characters that he repeats over and over across his stories. Whether something's scary is obviously very subjective, but his horror elements always fall flat to me, maybe because they're too specific/physical, he reveals too much. Even when he hits something very visceral like death of a child in Pet Sematary or helplessness in Misery/Gerald's Game, he drowns it in absurd crap and Halloween haunted house cheese. Too silly to be interesting, not silly enough to be fun. Even his fans (and he himself) admit his endings always suck. But his hot takes on Twitter are somehow even worse than his shitty books. May I present his take on the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict
Screenshot 2022-04-13 at 17-07-53 Stephen King on Twitter.pngScreenshot 2022-04-13 at 17-08-19 QuarantinedCoof on Twitter.png
 
His decades of success are baffling to me. Occasionally good premises but terrible execution, terrible writing, shallow characters that he repeats over and over across his stories. Whether something's scary is obviously very subjective, but his horror elements always fall flat to me, maybe because they're too specific/physical, he reveals too much. Even when he hits something very visceral like death of a child in Pet Sematary or helplessness in Misery/Gerald's Game, he drowns it in absurd crap and Halloween haunted house cheese. Too silly to be interesting, not silly enough to be fun. Even his fans (and he himself) admit his endings always suck. But his hot takes on Twitter are somehow even worse than his shitty books. May I present his take on the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict
View attachment 3176442View attachment 3176443

Again, he clearly lost his fucking way, and lost it Bigly.
He really pissed me off with his piss warm take in The Gunslinger (afterward) where he states that a writer who uses an outline or maps their story out is a hack.
Like, I'm sure this old lesbian looking guy who's three sheets to the wind on blow and hard liquor has all his fucking ducks in a row. Like Maximum Overdrive, huh?
 
I thought he was coked out of his gourd throughout most of the eighties? What I don't understand is why his editor didn't make him take the scene out.
His editor probably got bored by around page 600 and just started skimming. I know for a fact I've finished that book when I was a teenager but the last third is a total blur, I couldn't even get halfway through when I tried to re-read it last year. I can't tell if I'm becoming more ADHD riddled and rarted or if my tolerance for nonsense has receded.
 
Ironically the best short story in his Night Shift collection was Trucks. Which the movies Maximum Overdrive and Trucks were based on. No matter how you feel about the movies I really enjoyed the short story.
Third time's a charm now that there's so much anti-truck sentiment among the Left.

"Time to remake Trucks!" he posted, imagining Jay Bauman saying it.
 
I thought he was coked out of his gourd throughout most of the eighties? What I don't understand is why his editor didn't make him take the scene out.
Once you write like 2 or 3 books that makes millions, you don't have an editor any more. Just look at any modern book series that gets big, the books grow 1 or 300 pages an installment.
 
Read a few books of his and i hate hate hate how there's always some sleazy aside about how much the narrator wants to fuck some woman, whether or not the characters' relationship is relevant to anything.
Or, god help you, something about a prepubescent or teen girl's body. Especially when it's the father.
Like ok Stephen you're a tit man and possibly a pedo. Please write with both hands on the keyboard
 
Read a few books of his and i hate hate hate how there's always some sleazy aside about how much the narrator wants to fuck some woman, whether or not the characters' relationship is relevant to anything.
Or, god help you, something about a prepubescent or teen girl's body. Especially when it's the father.
Like ok Stephen you're a tit man and possibly a pedo. Please write with both hands on the keyboard
The real problem is the dishonesty and underhanded roundabout means of injecting it. If you want to write about teenage girls getting pumped, just do it. Don't pussyfoot around it. Just do it.

Let's not mince meat. We're all perverts. We all had high school girlfriends or crushes. You don't just stop being attracted to high school girls just because you got older. That's how everyone likes to pretend it works, but fuck you if I'm expected to settle for a middle-aged hag when I'm in my functional prime.

The problem is not the problem, the problem is his loitering cowardice.
 
The Moving Finger from Nightmares and Dreamscapes.
The teeth I was thinking of was the pair which protected the dude in the car from Chattery Teeth, a short story also in Nightmares and Dreamscapes, the only King book I ever bothered with.

And to add, I would have preferred Sutter Cane bringing about the end of the world with his novels than having King around.
 
How many creepy child centered erotica do you have to write to be considered a pedo?
One?
No. Two.
Thomas Mann uped the age of the boy Aschenbach is attracted to in Death in Venice from 10 to 14.

Would we call Nabokov a pedo for Lolita? I don't think so. Mann is different, despite me being a fan. I recently read his Doctor Faustus and there is a young boy, the main character's nephew, and the narrator gushes how great and wise this young boy is, and I couldn't help but think about noncery. Off putting.

King is a pedo purely because he Tweets retarded things. The gangbangs only help the case.

edit: I get it. Mann is making a point about decadence of his own time within the decadence of himself. It is a grand point, but it is hard to read at times.
 
Last edited:
Thomas Mann uped the age of the boy Aschenbach is attracted to in Death in Venice from 10 to 14.

Would we call Nabokov a pedo for Lolita? I don't think so. Mann is different, despite me being a fan. I recently read his Doctor Faustus and there is a young boy, the main character's nephew, and the narrator gushes how great and wise this young boy is, and I couldn't help but think about noncery. Off putting.

King is a pedo purely because he Tweets retarded things. The gangbangs only help the case.

edit: I get it. Mann is making a point about decadence of his own time within the decadence of himself. It is a grand point, but it is hard to read at times.
Don't know anything about Mann.
As far as I know about Nabokov's Lolita, I get the impression its more of a story about a weak nigger unable to control his pedo urges and eventually meeting his downfall because of it instead of some random cp fetish-fick. Don't know how raunchy the book was tho lol
Maybe Nabokov was a pedo lol
 
Don't know anything about Mann.
As far as I know about Nabokov's Lolita, I get the impression its more of a story about a weak nigger unable to control his pedo urges and eventually meeting his downfall because of it instead of some random cp fetish-fick. Don't know how raunchy the book was tho lol
Maybe Nabokov was a pedo lol
Lolita has an affect because it's not a common topic to read about explicitly, but it is also quite funny which is a deliberate ploy by the narrator, but you don't feel bad for laughing.

Mann is a pedo on a certain level, but Nabokov... I don't see it. He was a libertarian though so you know....

I'd recommend it. It's not going to turn you into an Ethan Ralph kid diddler or make you browse Reddit so it musn't be all bad.
 
Lolita has an affect because it's not a common topic to read about explicitly, but it is also quite funny which is a deliberate ploy by the narrator, but you don't feel bad for laughing.

Mann is a pedo on a certain level, but Nabokov... I don't see it. He was a libertarian though so you know....

I'd recommend it. It's not going to turn you into an Ethan Ralph kid diddler or make you browse Reddit so it musn't be all bad.
I've heard from many folk who say that few, if anyone at all, think Nabokov as a pedo.
I've been wanting to read that book for many years since it's suposed to be a technical masterpiece, though it's hard for me to get through the bad vibe you get from the premise lol
Maybe I'll get to it one day.
 
Back