Would you press the Red Button or Blue Button?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Would you press the Red Button or Blue Button?

  • Blue

    Votes: 22 17.1%

  • Red

    Votes: 107 82.9%
  • Total voters
    129
Where can I press the button that kills everyone who asks this retarded engagement bait question? It's just a worse trolley problem.
 
The pure irony that so many people ITT who pressed red have probably complained about the west becoming a low trust society
 
Gregis said:
Would you rather experience all the pain you’ll ever have in your life all at once, or no?
Click to expand...
This is more interesting than OP's question where there's no downside to the red button. Is it only all of the future pain or pain you've already experienced included? Only physical or both emotional and physical?
 
Everyone is gathered at a new facility, do you:
Option A: Chimp out and wreck the place.
Option B: Not act like a nigger.


If more than 50% of people choose to chimp out, the cops decide they'd rather stay in the station and eat donuts.
If less than 50% of people chimp out, all those that did get arrested.
 
ilovecornsyrup said:
This is more interesting than OP's question where there's no downside to the red button. Is it only all of the future pain or pain you've already experienced included? Only physical or both emotional and physical?
Click to expand...
Its actually not more interesting because 55% of virtue signalling retards on twitter are picking blue for some reason
 
TulpaTownW said:
Its actually not more interesting because 55% of virtue signalling retards on twitter are picking blue for some reason
Click to expand...
Nagato Kai Ni Surigao said:
>Press red button
>Wake up in a world without virtue signalling retards on twitter
You don't have to sell me on it, I've already made up my mind
Click to expand...
Knowing twitter people they'll get outed as pressing red when they said they pressed the blue one
 
Reminder that for blue to win both India and China would also need to hit blue en masse.

Red is literally the only logical answer, why would anyone not pick red? If everyone picks red then the end-result is the exact same as most people picking blue, and the only one with a downside is blue lmao
 
I had to do this as an exercise once. The "correct" answer is everyone should vote blue so everyone survives. But I still vote red.
 
When I was first introduced to this I thought it was a way of representing the American elections and what the one asking thinks the elections will result in.
Something something, blue is democrats and red is republicans and how the republicans will kill all the democrats or something.

Perhaps I'm just reading too much into it.
Overall, I dislike the question.


As for my vote, I chose blue to be a contrarian. :P
 
TulpaTownW said:
there seems to be something fundamentally wrong with blue voters brains
they cant comprehend everyone can just vote red
Click to expand...
I have not read their comments, but maybe an assumption is that some of the other people will vote blue, and so they are condemned to die if red wins, so for the same reason that "everyone can vote red", then "everyone can vote blue" and avoid accidental casualties.

So they'll balance towards blue to save those others (who also voted blue without knowing or thinking much). Essentially, "you should be altruistic, because if eveyone is, then everyone is saved", if you are not, then "you are selfish and potentially condemning others".

Of course this is just in theory, if the time were to come, actions would speak louder than words.
 
Red is the objective best choice.

Worst case: you lose a friend or two. Best case: the world is cleansed from baby boomers. The rich already plans to cull the population anyway, it'll be fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom