View attachment 2045826
My point was that nobody else here was discussing him or his theories except you who consistently brought him up. Even the other poster who mentioned him 1) did so in response to you and 2) never admitted to "following" them, just posed a question of "how is [known tinfoiler] any less reliable than [lying journalists]?".
Moreso, this throws back to the original "literally who?" pages ago, wherein you -
after openly thirsting for more government regulation of our private lives - goes on to call us the bootlickers for sucking up to some powerless conspiracy theorist who nobody even mentioned until you did?
You: "I hope big government makes vax passports a thing"
Me: "You lick boots"
You: "Ackachually, u lick the boots of some literal who"