Lolcow Xiao-Feng-Fury - Won't Shut Up About Homos

[Himawari]

No Christian supports homosexuality, and if he or she does, then that person is misguided and has not read the Word on these things...and you fit that bill perfectly.

Who said anything about the old law?

Who said anything about the old law? You did, not a sentence earlier.

the Word on these things [ie. Leviticus 18:22]

 

[Saney]

No Christian supports homosexuality, and if he or she does, then that person is misguided and has not read the Word on these things...and you fit that bill perfectly.

Who said anything about the old law?

Who said anything about the old law? You did, not a sentence earlier.

the Word on these things [ie. Leviticus 18:22]

What a total dumbass.

 

[José Mourinho]

No Christian supports homosexuality, and if he or she does, then that person is misguided and has not read the Word on these things...and you fit that bill perfectly.

Who said anything about the old law?

Who said anything about the old law? You did, not a sentence earlier.

the Word on these things [ie. Leviticus 18:22]

I had to facepalm at this because by her logic, we had to follow old Bible rules e.g. burning animals and stuff like that.

 

[CalmMyTits]

I had to look up douche cannon after seeing Xiao being called one, and wow, it fits her SO perfectly because all too often I am blown away by her stupidity.

 

[Saney]

I had to look up douche cannon after seeing Xiao being called one, and wow, it fits her SO perfectly because all too often I am blown away by her stupidity.

As does "douche rocket".

 

[Lady Houligan]

Still not banned! Planning on just repeating the question of where in the New Testament it says "BTW NO HOMO" until she cracks and admits that it's never mentioned in those books or the banhammer does come down. Thank you Honors College for making me read the Bible academically.

 

[Saney]

Still not banned! Planning on just repeating the question of where in the New Testament it says "BTW NO HOMO" until she cracks and admits that it's never mentioned in those books or the banhammer does come down. Thank you Honors College for making me read the Bible academically.

Betting now that the bad hammer comes first. She's not the type to admit defeat, rather, she ignores the problem until it goes away...or she makes it go away.

 

[Lady Houligan]

Still not banned! Planning on just repeating the question of where in the New Testament it says "BTW NO HOMO" until she cracks and admits that it's never mentioned in those books or the banhammer does come down. Thank you Honors College for making me read the Bible academically.

Betting now that the bad hammer comes first. She's not the type to admit defeat, rather, she ignores the problem until it goes away...or she makes it go away.

Sad but true, I'm betting you're right. I'm just hoping to put a hell of a twist into her panties before she gets sick of me.

Off topic, who do we think would win in a bitch fight for stubborn refusal to claim they're wrong? Rika or Xiao?

 

[Trombonista]

Still not banned! Planning on just repeating the question of where in the New Testament it says "BTW NO HOMO" until she cracks and admits that it's never mentioned in those books or the banhammer does come down. Thank you Honors College for making me read the Bible academically.

Betting now that the bad hammer comes first. She's not the type to admit defeat, rather, she ignores the problem until it goes away...or she makes it go away.

Sad but true, I'm betting you're right. I'm just hoping to put a hell of a twist into her panties before she gets sick of me.

Off topic, who do we think would win in a bitch fight for stubborn refusal to claim they're wrong? Rika or Xiao?

Depends on whether Rika has poo to fling.

 

[random_pickle]

Still not banned! Planning on just repeating the question of where in the New Testament it says "BTW NO HOMO" until she cracks and admits that it's never mentioned in those books or the banhammer does come down. Thank you Honors College for making me read the Bible academically.

Betting now that the bad hammer comes first. She's not the type to admit defeat, rather, she ignores the problem until it goes away...or she makes it go away.

Sad but true, I'm betting you're right. I'm just hoping to put a hell of a twist into her panties before she gets sick of me.

Off topic, who do we think would win in a bitch fight for stubborn refusal to claim they're wrong? Rika or Xiao?

Screencap that before she hides it.

 

[Lady Houligan]

Betting now that the bad hammer comes first. She's not the type to admit defeat, rather, she ignores the problem until it goes away...or she makes it go away.

Sad but true, I'm betting you're right. I'm just hoping to put a hell of a twist into her panties before she gets sick of me.

Off topic, who do we think would win in a bitch fight for stubborn refusal to claim they're wrong? Rika or Xiao?

Screencap that before she hides it.

Oh believe me, I've been documenting each new addition to the thread.

 

[José Mourinho]

Good luck for that, Lady Houligan.

 

[Grand Number of Pounds]

Yeah, don't talk crazy to a crazy person. You'll be brought down to their level and they'll beat you with experience.

But what the heck. We might get some lulz out of it

 

[Lady Houligan]

But wait, there's more!

I'm sort of pissed at myself that I didn't point out that I have yet to say that I hate anyone. Reading comprehension fail much, Xiao?

 

[CalmMyTits]

Xiao has proven time and time again to me that he reading comprehension does indeed fail. (we've had a on and off again relationship for several years, I butted heads with her for the first time in like, 2008 or 2009)

Also, kudos on your arguments. It's funny how the Bible contradicts itself by saying people should remain virgins/unmarried, but in the same chapter, talks about wives obeying their husbands for intercourse.

Yeah, Natalie. Learn how 2 Bible.

Oh by the way, your pwnage of her should go to her Encyclopedia Dramatica article since what you're doing is perfect.

 

[Saney]

Xiao's reply.

Jesus is God, you silly person. Whatever the Word says about homosexuality, is what God (Jesus) said about it. However, Christ did say this, "But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female". (Mark 10:6).


Remember 'be fruitful and multiply'? Under your perverted logic, this would not make sense because you believe that God created these people to be in love. Love does not excuse sexual perversion, and no matter how much scripture I give you, it doesn't appear as if you will understand it. You think you're so smart, don't you? Using scripture out of context to support your twisted view of love? Shame on you.

...

Those scholars are foolish. No where in the bible does the Lord condone the union of the same sex. Had he did, then Adam would have had another male mate, but then THIS scripture would have not came to pass, "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth" (Genesis 1:2. Tell me. If Adam had a male for a wife, how would they have been able to be fruitful and MULTIPLY THE WORLD?! Find that in the scripture, and might I add---good luck.


And among the list in Rev 21:8, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 are HOMOSEXUALS, people who lie on the Lord and think that God created them to be sexually confused and perverted. This is blasphemy and an outright lie. It's a shame that you quote scriptures, yet have no idea what you are talking about.


The only person who is cherry picking is you. Maybe if you READ all of 1 Corinthians 7, you would have found the answer. Paul says that it is better that folks do not marry because they can dedicate more time to the Lord, instead of having to see after family. BUT...8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I. 9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn (1 Corinthians 7:8-9). And the word tells when divorce is necessary such as adultery, but the Word clearly says, "14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy. 15 But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace".

I showed you where God said that homosexuality is sin. The problem is that you are blind to the scripture and willfully ignorant to the truth. No where in the Word does it say that homosexuality is not a sin.


Take your own advice.

Christ, I want to slap her. She's just so God damn smug.

 

[Trombonista]

People like her should just say that they find gay sex icky. They'd still be bigoted morons, but at least they'd be honest.

 

[Surtur]

The term homosexual did not exist back then, how could that word.be used?

 

[CalmMyTits]

Um... Jesus is NOT god. He is the Son of God, there is no 'Holy Trinity/Three in One' as the Catholic Church taught. Wow, Natalie! Way to know your own God!

 

[Lady Houligan]

Xiao has proven time and time again to me that he reading comprehension does indeed fail. (we've had a on and off again relationship for several years, I butted heads with her for the first time in like, 2008 or 2009)

Also, kudos on your arguments. It's funny how the Bible contradicts itself by saying people should remain virgins/unmarried, but in the same chapter, talks about wives obeying their husbands for intercourse.

Yeah, Natalie. Learn how 2 Bible.

Oh by the way, your pwnage of her should go to her Encyclopedia Dramatica article since what you're doing is perfect.

Thank you for the compliment, lol. I'm a bit in awe of my first trolling outing going so well. I'll have to upload it all once she finally gets too pissed to put up anything "coherent" and blocks me.