Lolcow Xiao-Feng-Fury - Won't Shut Up About Homos

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
"And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth" (Genesis 1:28).
The thing about this is, back when the Bible was written? There was a NEED for humanity to multiply; there were not as many humans and the species needed to flourish. And sexual intercourse is an action that takes energy that needed to be rationed properly so they could do the hard labor needed in order to survive. If you were going to be spending energy having sex, you damn well better have been working to solve the population problem while you're at it.

Homosexuality was outlawed not because it was unholy, but because it was counter-productive.

Populating the earth is the least of our worries nowadays (on the contrary, the issue now is overpopulation).

(This is what my pastors taught me in high school youth group.)
 
Also, just because the first two people God created were straight doesn't automatically mean God hates gays; they just hadn't been created yet.
 
Himawari said:
"And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth" (Genesis 1:28).
The thing about this is, back when the Bible was written? There was a NEED for humanity to multiply; there were not as many humans and the species needed to flourish. And sexual intercourse is an action that takes energy that needed to be rationed properly so they could do the hard labor needed in order to survive. If you were going to be spending energy having sex, you damn well better have been working to solve the population problem while you're at it.

Homosexuality was outlawed not because it was unholy, but because it was counter-productive.

Populating the earth is the least of our worries nowadays (on the contrary, the issue now is overpopulation).

(This is what my pastors taught me in high school youth group.)

I actually brought that up to her in my last comment, that I doubted God would put two men or two women together and then go "SO YEAH GO MAKE BABIES AND SHIT KTHXBAI" before farting off to... I dunno, play vidya or invent the platypus. And on top of that (and shit I wish I'd thought of this earlier) when Christianity started THEY NEEDED MORE CHRISTIANS. Ergo, get married and start sexing.

Fuck. Xiao, don't block me yet, I still got shit to take you to task for...
 
Here's her latest response.

And no where in the Word does it say that homosexuality is condoned. I gave you scripture, but you can't see the forest from the trees.



Be on your way, pharisee.

...

Oh, and your pro-abortion, too? The condoning of the murder of innocent babies, yet you're trying to tell me about the Word??

Did you read what God says about those who kill the innocent?

Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,

19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.


Hypocrite to the fullest. Repent.

Must...resist...urge to A-Log!
 
What does killing the innocent got to do with pro-abortion? This seems so terribly forced considering the use of "innocent babies".
 
Saney said:
Here's her latest response.

And no where in the Word does it say that homosexuality is condoned. I gave you scripture, but you can't see the forest from the trees.



Be on your way, pharisee.

...

Oh, and your pro-abortion, too? The condoning of the murder of innocent babies, yet you're trying to tell me about the Word??

Did you read what God says about those who kill the innocent?

Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and MANOS that shed innocent blood,

18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,

19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.


Hypocrite to the fullest. Repent.

Must...resist...urge to A-Log!

So, does the Lord hate six or seven things? I mean yes, 7 things are listed here, but why say the Lord hated six things at first, and then change it to seven in the next sentence? Although a lying tongue and a false witness that speaks lies could be technically the same thing, bringing the things he hates from seven down to six.
 
Alan Pardew said:
What does killing the innocent got to do with pro-abortion? This seems so terribly forced considering the use of "innocent babies".

I hate that phrase. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it because it is so redundant as to be a tautology (how could anyone find a baby guilty of some deliberate offense?) -- but it also contradicts the theology of several branches of Christianity (including Catholicism IIRC) that say that we're all born in a condition of sin, and until we're baptized, or take first communion, or whatever, there are in fact sort of "guilty babies." I think the Vatican revised its official statement on this, but unbaptized babies who died, in Catholic doctrine, used to go to Limbo rather than heaven. My mother was taught to pray for the souls of unbaptized babies so they could get into Heaven -- and for the souls of "heathen" babies in other countries that hadn't had the foresight to become Catholic yet.

I mean, it's like she's never heard of the whole doctrine of original sin. There's an American politician out there right now insisting that 15-week male fetuses mass debate in the womb, so I suppose if you follow his logic, there are in fact guilty fetuses as well.
 
Thank god that she isn't breeding
 
NobleGreyHorse said:
Alan Pardew said:
What does killing the innocent got to do with pro-abortion? This seems so terribly forced considering the use of "innocent babies".

I hate that phrase. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it because it is so redundant as to be a tautology (how could anyone find a baby guilty of some deliberate offense?) -- but it also contradicts the theology of several branches of Christianity (including Catholicism IIRC) that say that we're all born in a condition of sin, and until we're baptized, or take first communion, or whatever, there are in fact sort of "guilty babies." I think the Vatican revised its official statement on this, but unbaptized babies who died, in Catholic doctrine, used to go to Limbo rather than heaven. My mother was taught to pray for the souls of unbaptized babies so they could get into Heaven -- and for the souls of "heathen" babies in other countries that hadn't had the foresight to become Catholic yet.

I mean, it's like she's never heard of the whole doctrine of original sin. There's an American politician out there right now insisting that 15-week male fetuses mass debate in the womb, so I suppose if you follow his logic, there are in fact guilty fetuses as well.
It's baptism, because back in the day (any maybe still today?) there were people who made sure they were never baptized until they were on their death bed. Because baptism was (is?) one giant Get Out of Sin Free card it meant that you could do whatever you wanted and avoid church and forgiveness and all that stuff so long as you were baptized before you died.

It's also relevant to note that some Mormons have baptized people after they've died so they can get into heaven. You might recall that more then a few people were pissed off that Anne Frank was someone they baptized.
 
Oh God, shes made a new journal entry.

LGBT Gang Assaults Street Preachers (Language!)

But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost (2 Corinthians 4:3).

SEATTLE, WA, July 4, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A street preacher was repeatedly punched in the head and kicked by two men at Seattle's Pride fest this past Sunday – and the entire confrontation was caught on camera. [link]

Well, the tolerant gang continues to show their love and acceptance! Unlike the first video I showed you, these homosexuals actually began to physically assault their opponents. The event took place at a Gay Pride parade, and please...I don't want to hear anything about, "well, they shouldn't have been there". As we can see, the LGBTs do not tolerate anyone who opposes their perversion, especially if the opposition is of God's word. Some LGBTs broke up the fight, but overall, these people are not of love or tolerance. Equality does not viciously pummel people for disagreeing. Even still, saints, we have to keep preaching the Word. Persecution IS HERE, but we have to keep our heads up and witness the Word through and through! If you have been flamed here at Deviantart for disagreeing with homosexuality, consider it a blessing. Let the Lord strengthen you through tribulation. If those brave saints can endure a beating from the angry mob of homosexuals, then surely we can take a few bad words. We have to keep preaching no matter what.

I...dislike this woman with a burning passion.
 
Yeah. Every time she makes a journal about da homos, it's always to cast them in a negative light. Never something uplifting about a gay couple adopting a orphan baby or something like that.

"I don't want to hear anything about, "well, they shouldn't have been there". As we can see, the LGBTs do not tolerate anyone who opposes their perversion, especially if the opposition is of God's word."

Never mind that not everyone is a Christian or cares to hear what your religious book says. I certainly wouldn't be tolerant of someone who showed up at a pride fest to lecture the opposite.

Perhaps someone should show this to Natalie... http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/0 ... -Literally
 
What do you expect from a biblical extremist? We have tons of social warriors in our modern society.
 
This is too much USI at its finest.
 
I sent her the link to a news article about a pastor having his flock attack a gay couple. She said, What Christian would do that?

... Really, Natalie?
 
CalmMyTits said:
I sent her the link to a news article about a pastor having his flock attack a gay couple. She said, What Christian would do that?

... Really, Natalie?
[youtube]dFKylgGk73I[/youtube]
 
^My thoughts exactly.

You can't argue with her WITH the Bible (As Lady Hooligan proved) and you can't argue with her WITHOUT the Bible either (as I proved when I tried to argue about the separation of church and state and not forcing your religion on others) You just can't win either way (in Natalie's eyes)
 
Still not blocked, yet... God she's being a bitch though. It's all about attacking me now and not about actually arguing her point. So I went to town on her a little.
tumblr_mpl2itMzoQ1qlsgbjo1_1280.png

tumblr_mpl2itMzoQ1qlsgbjo2_1280.png


I doubt after the daddy issues snark and the paragraph getting into analyzing her psyche that she's going to let me play in her sandbox for much longer.
 
Lady Hooligan... I think I love you. Will you marry me? Our lesbian marriage will only infuriate XFF even more.
 
CalmMyTits said:
Lady Hooligan... I think I love you. Will you marry me? Our lesbian marriage will only infuriate XFF even more.

I'd accept but I'm already married, and judging by Xiao's ladyboner for the traditional values of the Bible she might get off on polygamy.
 
Back