Yes, Michael Jackson was a pedophile and sexually assaulted chlidren (white boys almost exclusively of course)

Incredible to see people willing to defend a serial black pedophile on the kiwifarms of all places, not only that but so devoted to the zesty nigger as OP calls him that they are gunt guarding his corpse the moment the thread is created.

The guy slept with little boys. Would you let any adult man sleep with your pre teen son, retard? It's unbelievable, whites truly are the biggest retarded faggots when it comes to niggers. The nigger worship knows no bound, they will literally offer their children to the nigger and look the other way. How do you occupy yourself while your child spend the night in the same bed with an adult man? What are your thoughts at that moment? Bone chilling to think about

Captain happy, face the wall.
 
Jackson couldn’t have made his pedophilia anymore obvious. It’s amazing what you can get away with if you have fame and money.

When MJ was in his early 20’s he took Emmanuel Lewis “Webster” as his date to awards shows and all around town. Lewis was 12, but looked 5. After his success dating little black boys he moved on to what he coveted the most - little white boys.

Jackson was so obsessed with the English boy actor from Oliver! He got him to donate sperm to create test tube baby #2. (Bet he was disappointed it was a girl, or maybe requested it since he wouldn’t be able to resist a boy that looked like Mark Lester)

There have continued to be insane Jackson defenders for two reasons - his insane superfans and Sony owning the 50% of rights to his music catalog. That’s a billion dollar money maker and they pay reputation management companies millions to help defend the MJ reputation and sue ppl that endanger it. Until Sony took control MJ was in free fall and almost everyone acknowledged he was a creepy pedo. After they got control the reputation management went into high gear.

This is why you have such a strange array of online ppl who will defend MJ, it pays well. Only his insane, deluded fans actually believe he’s some asexual Peter pan just being innocent with his bed full of little boys and porn mags…fans and people who fall for the BS paid shills peddle.
 
The police found CSAM at his residence. If that’s not enough I don’t know what to tell you.
iirc those were "photography books" and the images of nude children therein were claimed to be "art" and "not prurient," which was obviously bullshit
 
It's rare to see farmers getting uppity over a dead nigger.
Seems silly when we have these map-types constantly feeling which way the wind is blowing, and testing people’s tolerance toward them all the time, for years, without much resistance.

 
The police found CSAM at his residence. If that’s not enough I don’t know what to tell you.
He also got quoted in one of the weird nudist pedo art books he had. Remember reading an article about his book collection and it had multiple "art" books full of naked kids. Nudist magazines and books got used by pedos as a way to sneak their sick shit in.
 
I mean he probably did. He definitely was fucked up mentally by his parents and childhood fame. But there was no smoking gun that I ever saw and by that I mean a victim that came forward with a story that sounded convincing and not a money grab.

I think having kids probably wasn’t a good thing, they don’t seem well either. Either way I won’t get mad if people see enough and call him a pedophile. I know he shouldn’t have been doing most of the shit he was doing and being around kids with his mental state. But I’m just not gonna get worked up either. He’s already dead anyway.
 
I'm just gonna throw this out there, a weird faggot who collects CP and boys' underwear is a pedophile.
 
Incredible to see people willing to defend a serial black pedophile on the kiwifarms of all places, not only that but so devoted to the zesty nigger as OP calls him that they are gunt guarding his corpse the moment the thread is created.

The guy slept with little boys. Would you let any adult man sleep with your pre teen son, retard? It's unbelievable, whites truly are the biggest retarded faggots when it comes to niggers. The nigger worship knows no bound, they will literally offer their children to the nigger and look the other way. How do you occupy yourself while your child spend the night in the same bed with an adult man? What are your thoughts at that moment? Bone chilling to think about

Captain happy, face the wall.
What inspired me to make this thread was the disgusting shit I saw Jackson truthers say. I just said he was probably guilty and got dogpiled in a chatroom where I just got accused of being a jewish agent over and over. And it's just like "no, I'm not letting this happen on my watch"

They've been spamming pol lately as well. Notice the projection from the Finnish flag. "You're actually the perv here for finding this weird" this is a classic pedophile tactic. Again, smartschool9 famously does it too. You start to notice these things

photo_2026-02-19_07-46-29.jpgphoto_2026-02-19_07-49-07.jpgphoto_2026-02-19_10-04-37.jpg

image.webp
UMMM...THAT ACTUALLY IS VERY UNUSUAL
 
iirc those were "photography books" and the images of nude children therein were claimed to be "art" and "not prurient," which was obviously bullshit
The material recovered for the trial included "Boys Will Be Boys", a mass-produced magazine that contained boys playing in lakes in swimtrunks and stuff, "The Boy: A Photographic Essay" a "le artistic" book that contained some images of nude boys sitting on rocks and the like, "The Fourth Sex: Adolescent Extremes" which was a counter-cultural fashion book featuring adolescents, and "Cronos" which is a collection of nude images of people of a bunch of different ages from small children to old men in chronological order over the course of 10 years to show the passage of time.

None of it was pornographic or illegal, which is why it was deemed irrelevant and no charges related to any of it were brought up against him in both the 93 and 03 trials.

Not only that, but when they scrubbed the book's pages for Jackson's fingerprints they weren't present except for the ones they explicitly handed Jackson in court to examine, and there was no semen present on any of them. Most of them were gifts from other people that he apparently never even read, let alone jerked off to or showed to the boys that hung out with him.

The only actual pornography recovered from Jackson's home were normal porn magazines that had nothing to do with boys or children.

As for the semen found in Jacksons bed/underwear, it didn't match any of the accusers DNA and was instead linked to two or three completely separate people, with nothing to suggest any link to the case or criminal activity in general. It wasn't even entered as evidence for the trial by the prosecution because it didn't prove anything besides him possibly having an orgy at some point.
 
FBI had looking into him for like a decade. He either wasn't a pedo after all or the prosecution bungled the case harder than the California prosecutors did with OJ.
 
Jackson being a chomo, Sony wanting to jew him for music rights, and fame chasers falsely claiming he molested their kids for a quick buck can all be true at the same time. I'm not sure why people think this has to be an either/or situation.
 
It's pretty obvious that if you're rich enough you can get away with basically everything and anything. We had a brief like 5 year window where pedophilia was heavily demonized and actually effected rich people, but now no one gives a shit.

Edit: by rich I mean elite level wealthy like Jackson, Musk, and others like that. Not some dude with a few million floating around.
 
Last edited:
Okay even with the argument of weather or not it's sexual aside, that's still nowhere near enough censorship dude. It doesn't even cover it up all the way, what the fuck are you thinking?

Like illegal or not it's still pictures of underage boys, you can't post it here.
You were just trying to hand wave away about how the images weren't that bad, now you're upset with the censored versions? Which is it? I think you're trying to get out from the shame of defending someone possessing this.
 
You were just trying to hand wave away about how the images weren't that bad, now you're upset with the censored versions? Which is it?
I didn't say they're "not that bad", I said they weren't pornographic, which they aren't. I also said that Jackson's fingerprints weren't present on it's pages before the trial, which they weren't, and that it was a gift from a completely different person, which it was.

I'm not upset at you trying to substantiate your argument here, I'm upset at you posting """censored""" versions with nothing but scribbles that you can still see through over it like a moron.

You can't post images of underage nudity here, even if it's not CP. Some retard named Headshot Reddot did the same thing where he posted medical journal images of underage penises and said it was indians, and the mods had to vaporize his ass.

You're being dangerously stupid.
 
Back
Top Bottom