LucasSomething
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
Do you think the game would have been received better if it had no voice acting at all like originally planned? They only had it fully voiced because the publisher pressured them to.
It's easy to use hindsight and say yeah, but i dont think so. If the game had no Voice acting i think people would just skip dialogue en mass and whine about not understanding the plot. The game has an impressive amount of voice acting that is worth praising.
But i think they'd hate Alex less because without a voice, it's easier to directly bash the writer and not the character, and doing that maybe they'd catch on the narrator being unreliable a little better. With the way he's voiced, Alex sounds "too honest therefore unselfaware" so there is little room for interpretation or nuance, he is just too easy to hate.
Like, i'm sure Andrew wanted people to hate alex of course but i think he assumed it would take longer to get there. Alex telling Rory no one cares feels like a shocking moment where the mask finally slips but the average player already hates him for awhile. It also doesnt land that well cause Rory is a garbage unit and whiny meaning a lot of people hate him more than alex.
If the player read Alex dialogue out loud it would be harder to hate him and easier to catch some red flags, like him getting the cat's gender wrong. Andrew is right when he said people "understand" in a novel but not in a game, but it's not impossible. You just need to know when to be vague and when to be unsubtle like in say, silent hill 2.