Culture Youtube gonna be tougher with content control, working with organizations such as ADL - Pepe is gonna be banned.

https://youtube.googleblog.com/2017/08/an-update-on-our-commitment-to-fight.html

A little over a month ago, we told you about the four new steps we’re taking to combat terrorist content on YouTube: better detection and faster removal driven by machine learning, more experts to alert us to content that needs review, tougher standards for videos that are controversial but do not violate our policies, and more work in the counter-terrorism space.

We wanted to give you an update on these commitments:

Better detection and faster removal driven by machine learning: We’ve always used a mix of technology and human review to address the ever-changing challenges around controversial content on YouTube. We recently began developing and implementing cutting-edge machine learning technology designed to help us identify and remove violent extremism and terrorism-related content in a scalable way. We have started rolling out these tools and we are already seeing some positive progress:
  • Speed and efficiency: Our machine learning systems are faster and more effective than ever before. Over 75 percent of the videos we've removed for violent extremism over the past month were taken down before receiving a single human flag.
  • Accuracy: The accuracy of our systems has improved dramatically due to our machine learning technology. While these tools aren’t perfect, and aren’t right for every setting, in many cases our systems have proven more accurate than humans at flagging videos that need to be removed.
  • Scale: With over 400 hours of content uploaded to YouTube every minute, finding and taking action on violent extremist content poses a significant challenge. But over the past month, our initial use of machine learning has more than doubled both the number of videos we've removed for violent extremism, as well as the rate at which we’ve taken this kind of content down.
We are encouraged by these improvements, and will continue to develop our technology in order to make even more progress. We are also hiring more people to help review and enforce our policies, and will continue to invest in technical resources to keep pace with these issues and address them responsibly.

More experts: Of course, our systems are only as good as the the data they’re based on. Over the past weeks, we have begun working with more than 15 additional expert NGOs and institutions through our Trusted Flagger program, including the Anti-Defamation League, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. These organizations bring expert knowledge of complex issues like hate speech, radicalization, and terrorism that will help us better identify content that is being used to radicalize and recruit extremists. We will also regularly consult these experts as we update our policies to reflect new trends. And we’ll continue to add more organizations to our network of advisors over time.

Tougher standards: We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes. We’ll begin to roll this new treatment out to videos on desktop versions of YouTube in the coming weeks, and will bring it to mobile experiences soon thereafter. These new approaches entail significant new internal tools and processes, and will take time to fully implement.

Early intervention and expanding counter-extremism work: We’ve started rolling out features from Jigsaw’s Redirect Method to YouTube. When people search for sensitive keywords on YouTube, they will be redirected towards a playlist of curated YouTube videos that directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages. We also continue to amplify YouTube voices speaking out against hate and radicalization through our YouTube Creators for Change program. Just last week, the U.K. chapter of Creators for Change, Internet Citizens, hosted a two-day workshop for 13-18 year-olds to help them find a positive sense of belonging online and learn skills on how to participate safely and responsibly on the internet. We also pledged to expand the program’s reach to 20,000 more teens across the U.K.

And over the weekend, we hosted our latest Creators for Change workshop in Bandung, Indonesia, where creators teamed up with Indonesia’s Maarif Institute to teach young people about the importance of diversity, pluralism, and tolerance.

Altogether, we have taken significant steps over the last month in our fight against online terrorism. But this is not the end. We know there is always more work to be done. With the help of new machine learning technology, deep partnerships, ongoing collaborations with other companies through the Global Internet Forum, and our vigilant community we are confident we can continue to make progress against this ever-changing threat. We look forward to sharing more with you in the months ahead.

The YouTube Team

This gonna be gud.
 
Google has to do some serious soul searching so more established business (not-youtube) aren't irreversibly fucked.

This isn't about making easy dollars on YouTube and then having that taken away from us, people hate it when companies have a lapse of ineptitude that screws those uninvolved over. The proxy events are what make Google's business decisions so exceptional.
 
I'm sorry, you're gonna have to explain this one to me. Is this really fucking true?

It's an unpleasant fact, but... Yeah, it's true.

It's one of those relatively poorly-kept secrets, right up there with Hollywood's infestation with pedophiles. I first learned about it covering the likes of Todd Nickerson and Sarah Nyberg, and it's one of those things that the more you think about, the angrier you're likely to get.

There are multiple pedophilia rings on Youtube. They range from posting somewhat borderline shit like kids in swimsuits to posting honest-to-god child porn unlisted. For whatever reason, Google never does anything about them until the FBI cracks down on one, often going so far as to actually terminate accounts that flag their videos too many times.

No one is sure why. The most common theory, which thankfully is backed by leaks alluding to this, is that several of the channels themselves are FBI honeypots, but given how high child trafficking rings stretch in the USA alone, and given how many investigations in Europe get shut down by government interference (when there's not members of said government supposedly in on it) it's a safe bet that, sadly, at least some of these are legit.

They're not particularly well-covered for a few reasons, and the biggest is that we don't really have all the data - because we can't really look too deeply into things like it without... Y'know, being exposed to the offending material and incriminating ourselves. That was something that happened when a massive pedophilia ring was reportedly dug up on Twitter; several reporting accounts got banned, but not the ones posting the content in the first place, which meant that everyone involved had to go through third parties for information and predictably turned the entire thing conspiratorial as fuck with no way to verify anything.

@Chan the Wizard can tell you a bit more, as he's reported similar a few times, but the fact is that we're never going to know the full breadth of it.
 
It's an unpleasant fact, but... Yeah, it's true.

It's one of those relatively poorly-kept secrets, right up there with Hollywood's infestation with pedophiles. I first learned about it covering the likes of Todd Nickerson and Sarah Nyberg, and it's one of those things that the more you think about, the angrier you're likely to get.

There are multiple pedophilia rings on Youtube. They range from posting somewhat borderline shit like kids in swimsuits to posting honest-to-god child porn unlisted. For whatever reason, Google never does anything about them until the FBI cracks down on one, often going so far as to actually terminate accounts that flag their videos too many times.

No one is sure why. The most common theory, which thankfully is backed by leaks alluding to this, is that several of the channels themselves are FBI honeypots, but given how high child trafficking rings stretch in the USA alone, and given how many investigations in Europe get shut down by government interference (when there's not members of said government supposedly in on it) it's a safe bet that, sadly, at least some of these are legit.

They're not particularly well-covered for a few reasons, and the biggest is that we don't really have all the data - because we can't really look too deeply into things like it without... Y'know, being exposed to the offending material and incriminating ourselves. That was something that happened when a massive pedophilia ring was reportedly dug up on Twitter; several reporting accounts got banned, but not the ones posting the content in the first place, which meant that everyone involved had to go through third parties for information and predictably turned the entire thing conspiratorial as fuck with no way to verify anything.

@Chan the Wizard can tell you a bit more, as he's reported similar a few times, but the fact is that we're never going to know the full breadth of it.

This is fucking sad.
 
I can't even.

The Independent reports that social media companies such as Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube have come under criticism for appearing to collaborate with the Iranian government to remove “immoral” content from their platforms, content that defies the Iranian government’s strict religious codes. Many of these apps are blocked within Iran but can often be accessed through the use of proxies and VPN servers.

:story:
 
Progtards are huge, hypocritical, amoral pieces of shit that feel their morality only applies to others and not them. Especially when it comes to money. Why should anyone be surprised?
 
This is less surprising than it should be.

All Obama's nuclear deal with Iran did was give the country more power that they do not need. We live in the world where Islam not only controls most Muslim-majority countries's Internet, Muslim leaders are also working with social media company like Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube to censor contents everywhere.
 

Well this explains a whole fucking lot. I'll admit that I never considered censorship heavy countries like the Muslim toilet bowls of the Middle-East when I described how Limited State Youtube would blow up in their face. They'll lose a couple hundred controversial Youtubers and gain a billion untapped, unwashed heathens. This makes Youtube way less retarded in the grand scheme of things, and completely demolishes the narrative we've all been hearing that SJ00Bs were behind it all. It might've been their idea, but the core reasons have nothing to do with Social Justice Warriorism.

It's going to be interesting to find out what'll happen when Youtube terrorists keep getting their videos removed, Youtube might stop doing exactly that and let their website become overran with ISIS recruitment and beheading videos, what a world that will be. Muslims will become America's new entertainment as we gawk at the chicken-tier intellect of these oxygen thieves, but we'll be consistently denied the opportunity to respond to any of it, giving them a "right by default" platform where their zealot ideologies reign supreme, reverberating throughout the (silent) free worlds that surround them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Fool
So now that Antifa is an acknowledged terrorist organization now, how long before they retract their statement about fighting terrorism and just go straight to banning anyone even remotely right-wing.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
They'll lose a couple hundred controversial Youtubers and gain a billion untapped, unwashed heathens. This makes Youtube way less retarded in the grand scheme of things, and completely demolishes the narrative we've all been hearing that SJ00Bs were behind it all. It might've been their idea, but the core reasons have nothing to do with Social Justice Warriorism.
Thing is, if YouTube is gonna start targeting a primarily Muslim audience, wouldn't the advertisers and brands being advertised have to switch for it to stay (remotely) commercially viable? I have no knowledge of who's actually using YouTube's ad space because I've been an AdBlock user for years now, but if you're an American company with a majority of your customers being in the west, what reason would you have to market to a bunch of kebabs in Iran? Brands aren't stupid, they'd pull ads if they weren't working, and no matter who comes around, YouTube would still lose.

I could be misunderstanding, so correct me if I'm wrong. I'm still not sure how YouTube could pull this off monetarily. Even before the golden age of AdBlock, YouTube was still losing money.
 
So now that Antifa is an acknowledged terrorist organization now, how long before they retract their statement about fighting terrorism and just go straight to banning anyone even remotely right-wing.

Why would they retract it? That would be shit PR. The goal is obviously to just ignore their mission statement and secretly let Muslims run amok on their site and silence anyone who notices because the big bucks are in delivering ads to billions of people who don't have the same animosity toward ads that we do so much as they consider carpet and plumbing a novelty.

Thing is, if YouTube is gonna start targeting a primarily Muslim audience, wouldn't the advertisers and brands being advertised have to switch for it to stay (remotely) commercially viable? I have no knowledge of who's actually using YouTube's ad space because I've been an AdBlock user for years now, but if you're an American company with a majority of your customers being in the west, what reason would you have to market to a bunch of kebabs in Iran? Brands aren't stupid, they'd pull ads if they weren't working, and no matter who comes around, YouTube would still lose.

I could be misunderstanding, so correct me if I'm wrong. I'm still not sure how YouTube could pull this off monetarily. Even before the golden age of AdBlock, YouTube was still losing money.

There's plenty of brands that are international, only local small timers will be the ones missing out. Then you have the people who offer purely digital services who could reach a whole new audience in a previously untapped populace. Then you have companies local to those Middle Eastern countries who would want to use Youtube to advertise to their local populace. There's also the fact that Youtube offers targeted advertising campaigns for those who purchase ad space with them, so they can target a demographic rather than paying for ads just to be spread in the wild. Brands can literally pick and choose who their ads are delivered to.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Sergeant Politeness
There's plenty of brands that are international, only local small timers will be the ones missing out. Then you have the people who offer purely digital services who could reach a whole new audience in a previously untapped populace. Then you have companies local to those Middle Eastern countries who would want to use Youtube to advertise to their local populace. There's also the fact that Youtube offers targeted advertising campaigns for those who purchase ad space with them, so they can target a demographic rather than paying for ads just to be spread in the wild. Brands can literally pick and choose who their ads are delivered to.

I'm sorry, but this is dumb. For a moment and the sake of argument, we're going to ignore that Google has proven fucking incompetent when it comes to targeting advertisements (check earlier in the thread), to the tune of having to repay millions of dollars due to ad fraud. Instead, we're focusing on your argument itself.

Your hypothesis would involve eschewing the entire western audience (read: people with computers and tubernets capable of looking at said ads) and instead microtargeting towards people who, by and large, do not have the sort of numbers or persistent access to the web to make said advertisements worthwhile.

In that circumstance, it's not going to matter how big your fucking brand is, if your platform is already cutting out the entire fucking audience of the western world in favor of becoming Al Jazeeratube, you're gonna lose a fucking enormous amount of money, and deservedly so. Yeah, I'm sure in the wake of the fucking AdPocalypse, major corporations that were anxious over their ads being on slightly racy content are going to be thrilled to have their advertisements on a platform where failure to show proper respect to the Islamic state gets you banhammered.

You're also acting like those purely hypothetical lucrative Muslims will somehow blossom into a new audience won't be fucking just as prone to using Adblock Halal Edition as the financially-solvent western pricks they are allegedly going to supplant .
 
Your hypothesis would involve eschewing the entire western audience (read: people with computers and tubernets capable of looking at said ads) and instead microtargeting towards people who, by and large, do not have the sort of numbers or persistent access to the web to make said advertisements worthwhile.

Also they don't have any fucking money. The ones who do aren't going to give a shit about videos of wailing and babbling but probably want Western content anyway.
 
Back