YouTube is removing the dislike count on all videos across its platform - YouTube believes the change will better protect its creators from harassment and reduce the threat of what it calls “dislike attacks” — essentially, when a group teams up to drive up the number of dislikes a video receives.

youtube-ios-app.jpg


YouTube today announced its decision to make the “dislike” count on videos private across its platform. The decision is likely to be controversial given the extent that it impacts the public’s visibility into a video’s reception. But YouTube believes the change will better protect its creators from harassment and reduce the threat of what it calls “dislike attacks” — essentially, when a group teams up to drive up the number of dislikes a video receives.

The company says that while dislike counts won’t be visible to the public, it’s not removing the dislike button itself. Users can still click the thumbs down button on videos to signal their dislike to creators privately. Meanwhile, creators will be able to track their dislikes in YouTube Studio alongside other analytics about their video’s performance, if they choose.

The change follows an experiment YouTube ran earlier this year whose goal was to determine if these sorts of changes would reduce dislike attacks and creator harassment.

At the time, YouTube explained that public dislike counts can affect creators’ well-being and may motivate targeted campaigns to add dislikes to videos. While that’s true, dislikes can also serve as a signal to others when videos are clickbait, spam or misleading, which can be useful.

YouTube said it had also heard from smaller creators and others who were just getting started on the platform that they felt they were being unfairly targeted by dislike attacks. The experiment confirmed this was true — creators with smaller channels were targeted with dislike attacks more than larger creators were.

YouTube declined to share the specific details or the data collected through those experiments when TechCrunch asked, however. But it said it ran its tests for “multiple months” and conducted “in-depth analysis of the impact” as to how the changes affected both users and creators alike.

The company had experimented with different designs for removing the dislike counts, including one where the word “Dislike” appeared underneath the thumbs down button instead of the number of dislikes. This is the design the company has now settled on, which is less of a disruptive change to the row of engagement buttons beneath a video.

youtube-dislike.png


The company would not be the first major platform to experiment with the idea of reducing the public visibility of signals that convey user sentiment. For similar mental health-related reasons, Instagram a couple of years ago began tests to hide its Like counts globally. It believed the focus on achieving Likes could be detrimental to its community and may make creators less comfortable expressing themselves on the platform. Ultimately, though, neither Facebook nor Instagram could fully commit to a decision and instead put the power to hide Likes back under users’ control — a move that effectively kept the status quo intact.

YouTube’s changes to the “dislike” count are being introduced at a time when there’s been a public reckoning over big tech and its impact on mental health, particularly when it comes to minors. Companies have been rethinking how their systems are designed to target and influence their user base, as well as what sort of changes they can make ahead of coming regulations. In a number of markets, lawmakers have been dragging in tech execs to hearings — YouTube included — and are crafting legislation aimed at reigning in some of tech’s more problematic elements. Mental health is only one area of regulatory interest, though, along with ad targeting, privacy, algorithmic boosting of misinformation and more.

In YouTube’s case, the company has attempted to get ahead of some of the required changes by implementing increased protections and privacy features for users ages 13 to 17 while also decreasing the monetization potential for “unhealthy” kids’ content. But the larger shift in the market is also pushing companies to consider the other areas of their platforms that are potentially toxic to broad groups of people.

That said, YouTube told TechCrunch today’s removal of the dislike count is not being guided by any regulatory changes, but rather its support for creators.

“We are proactively making this change because YouTube has a responsibility to protect creators, especially smaller creators, from harassment and dislike attacks,” a spokesperson said.

The company, of course, is also rolling this out when the battle for creator talent is becoming hugely competitive among tech giants. Today’s social platforms are establishing funds to retain their top creators amid increased competition, particularly from the growing threat of TikTok. YouTube this year announced a $100 million creator fund to jumpstart its short-form video platform, for example. And, over the past year or so, it’s introduced several new features and policies aimed at improving the creator experience.

The changes to the dislike count will roll out globally across YouTube’s platform starting today, including all devices and the web.


 
It seems like this effort is incomplete though. Here is a reupload of a MATI stream. I can still see the single dislike it has.


I guess obscure videos come later? Also, Josh sounds way different than I imagined.
 
It seems like this effort is incomplete though. Here is a reupload of a MATI stream. I can still see the single dislike it has.


I guess obscure videos come later? Also, Josh sounds way different than I imagined.
Despite saying "today" they seem to have not implemented the fucking thing yet at all. The announcement vid has 14k dislikes currently with the likes suspiciously bumping up by another thousand suddenly every time the dislike number goes up. something seedy is going on with the like counter but they're trying to be stealthy right now it seems compared to the initial moment where the dislikes were just weirdly going missing.
 
Last edited:
Big companies and big government is what this is all about.

Rumor has it that Disney has been furious that their Star Wars stuff and their awful 'Phase whatever' Marvel stuff was getting hilariously down voted and pulled some strings.

Pfizer was pissed that their child-vaccination propaganda was ratio'd to hell.

Hell, even Nintendo is freaking out over their "Online Expansion Pass" scam shit getting downvoted.

And that's not even factoring in the White House. They're throwing total shitfits when their stuff gets universally down voted. They're probably the main factor behind this.
 
@Null ,pin this, this is going to be a HUGE step forward with hugboxes and echo chambers. When will Facebook and so follow suit I wonder?
Edit: Just when the Rittenhouse trial has progressed unfavorably to the system? Interesting timing. A tentative first step in something larger perhaps?
lol he himself removed reaction emojis from A&H. he should stay quiet on this as his actions are not much different from that of google
 
They're removing dislikes now. Then they will remove the like feature, then they will sell you the ability to upvote and downvote videos. Mark my words.

The writing is on the wall. Youtube plays ads, saying if you want an ad free experience then you should buy youtube premium. Yet, if they cared about us not seeing ads, they wouldn't play an ad telling us to get premium so that we don't have to see ads.

Selling the ability to upvote/downvote is the next big money spinner.
 
They're removing dislikes now. Then they will remove the like feature, then they will sell you the ability to upvote and downvote videos. Mark my words.

The writing is on the wall. Youtube plays ads, saying if you want an ad free experience then you should buy youtube premium. Yet, if they cared about us not seeing ads, they wouldn't play an ad telling us to get premium so that we don't have to see ads.

Selling the ability to upvote/downvote is the next big money spinner.
Twitters already testing the waters with this kinda shit by making the edit button a paid subscription service apperently from what I've heard.
 
You say this while Facebook (meta whatever), twitter and reddit have male CEOs and they still suck ass with shit decisions.
Either way CEOs are dumb.
Reddit was ruined by a female CEO, as was HP and Yahoo. It's not just tech companies that female CEOs ruin either; GM has gone down the shitter since Mary Barra took over.
 
Reddit was ruined by a female CEO, as was HP and Yahoo. It's not just tech companies that female CEOs ruin either; GM has gone down the shitter since Mary Barra took over.
Its probably more to do with the fact that female CEO's are lauded as the "Great Solution" to everything and then they inflate some dumb bitch, put her in position (sometimes as a front) and then its just a fucking disaster. Most CEO positions are just empty suits anyway and putting females into positions are usually just a way to put up a front about how great your company is while it silently commits the evils it was going to anyhow.
 
Big companies and big government is what this is all about.

Rumor has it that Disney has been furious that their Star Wars stuff and their awful 'Phase whatever' Marvel stuff was getting hilariously down voted and pulled some strings.

Pfizer was pissed that their child-vaccination propaganda was ratio'd to hell.

Hell, even Nintendo is freaking out over their "Online Expansion Pass" scam shit getting downvoted.

And that's not even factoring in the White House. They're throwing total shitfits when their stuff gets universally down voted. They're probably the main factor behind this.
Billon dollar companies and other assholes have hurt feels.
 
I guess this is the same as when netflix ditched their star ratings because amy schumer got her asshole blown wide open by people one-starring her shitty "comedy" special.
TFW the biden administration is the amy schumer of politics.
Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer(D) is no kidding Amy Schumer's uncle/cousin/something. I never remember how first cousins work.
 
lol

View attachment 2711883

LOL.

Proof that these people are not to be trusted. Please suck those Corporate dick more like a whore, fucking hacks.
What's wacky is most people that would usually make claims like this even said "NO THIS IS BAD NOBODY ASKED FOR THIS". Surprised it took this long for a bootlicker to show up and frame the universal backlash as "straight white dudes"
 
Reddit was ruined by a female CEO, as was HP and Yahoo. It's not just tech companies that female CEOs ruin either; GM has gone down the shitter since Mary Barra took over.
Imagine believing Ellen Pao had anything to do with decision-making on Reddit.

She was setup to take the fall so that the next CEO had a blank cheque to push his changes while everyone was outraged about her.
 
Imagine believing Ellen Pao had anything to do with decision-making on Reddit.

She was setup to take the fall so that the next CEO had a blank cheque to push his changes while everyone was outraged about her.
She also only wanted a golden parachute to pay off her husband's debt. I think it was either legal fees or lawsuits. The perfect cover to bring in unpopular changes and get kicked to the curb for cash.
 
Back