Zero Day Defense Appreciation Thread - "I don't have a single X chromosome."

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

The Last Stand

Lady Bougainvillea
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Are you married?

Have you met your father?

When did I say that?

More like "it takes two to tango".

..I did say that, yes. It's a comment that has nothing to do with anything or anyone that exists here.


Coerce the argument into mutual level-headedness as you give your contribution, don't participate in/withdraw from the conversation, or expect the breakdown that will almost inevitably follow in lobbing meaningless insults. I can't control anybody else, and nobody can control the tonal impressions anyone gets from anyone else.

Tone policing is bullshit, especially in totally opt-in and opt-out conversations.

At a more productive point in this thread, the conversations I had on this front roughly resembled:

"I reckon women overall have strong interest in fiction such as X (as supported by its sales and enduring cultural presence) because it appeals to some set A, B, and C of seemingly common female traits and desires."

"Not all women are like that. I'm not like that. I've never heard any woman claim that."

"I didn't claim all women were like that, I was making a generalization based on what I made it on. Is there a reason why I should take you and your personal experiences as even vaguely generally representative?"

We're an abnormal population sample and I know close to nothing about most of you-- that italicized question is especially pertinent. Yet I think I was expected to just accept the argument because the person saying it said she was a woman, and not because she was in a special position that lent gravity to her observation (no, being an individual woman, by itself, doesn't lend that).

You claim:

but why would that be a better solution?

You're asking that I attempt to grok the motivations of a small, completely opt-in, naturally abnormal sample size, in pursuit of an effective generalization for a global subculture. This is despite the fact that nearly all the people in said group only ever talked about their power fantasy, without trying to contrast it with any other proposed group or contradict any generalized theory given.

Why should I do that, when their perspectives are framed as "speaking-for-myself"? And are you claiming I should do so in place of considering other groups that are much larger and broader? If not, why are the statements of ~13 people (I'm spitballing, here) making inherently individual statements a sufficient contradiction or elucidation of millions of people making directed time and money investments? Why would they provide any strong insight to their comparatively extremely large subculture, by themselves?

Even saying there's no such thing as a "proper generalization" would be a more relevant argument, because the validity of such an argument preempts the entire conversation by attacking the assumption that a generalization can be made.


But did Tyrone consent?

Which is why I say:

Saying "you're being mean" isn't a valuable statement. Is the other person going to stop being mean in response? You only know for sure that you want to have the conversation.


Truly, you're a merciful bull. My understanding is that the penalty is a reverse buck breaking.

I'd really like to see what women think of the general underlying appeal of female power fantasies-- and even that of male power fantasies if they care to theorize about that. It would be more interesting than just saying "this is my female power fantasy", since that's not able to be extrapolated and-- frankly-- obviously isn't meant to be.

How much of a koala are you that four words is too much to read?

Don't take out your Funko Pop withdrawal out on me.
And my personal favorite:
That wasn't an insult. That was a plea.

Everyone knows about your punishment.

I don't have a single X chromosome. Why would you ask me this?

Homie, that's just a male power fantasy with tits!

I don't get it.

Ladies, is this guy a keeper or hwhat?
 
@Hollywood Hulk Hogan has posted an article about @Zero Day Defense 's health condition:
I don't have a single X chromosome. Why would you ask me this?
Except for me, because I'm more guy than any other guy.

I'm double guy.
47,XYY syndrome is characterized by an extra copy of the Y chromosome in each of a male's cells. Although many males with this condition are taller than average, the chromosomal change sometimes causes no unusual physical features. Most males with 47,XYY syndrome have normal production of the male sex hormone testosterone and normal sexual development, and they are usually able to father children.\n\n47,XYY syndrome is associated with an increased risk of learning disabilities and delayed development of speech and language skills. Affected boys can have delayed development of motor skills (such as sitting and walking) or weak muscle tone (hypotonia). Other signs and symptoms of this condition include hand tremors or other involuntary movements (motor tics), seizures, and asthma. Males with 47,XYY syndrome have an increased risk of behavioral, social, and emotional difficulties compared with their unaffected peers. These problems include attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); depression; anxiety; and autism spectrum disorder, which is a group of developmental conditions that affect communication and social interaction.\n\nPhysical features related to 47,XYY syndrome can include increased belly fat, a large head (macrocephaly), unusually large teeth (macrodontia), flat feet (pes planus), fifth fingers that curve inward (clinodactyly), widely spaced eyes (ocular hypertelorism), and abnormal side-to-side curvature of the spine (scoliosis). These characteristics vary widely among affected boys and men
tl;dr : STOP BEING AN ABLEIST AND STOP CYBERBULLYING HIM
 
Last edited:
nowkith.jpg

LOVE IS IN THE AIR 🎵
 
None of these excerpts retain the value you want to showcase. They're taken out of the context of a thread that was substantially derailed for multiple pages on account of-- among other things-- me not letting anything above the most banal of jeers slide. Your OP ends up coming across more like a post in random_text.txt.

On the other hand, if you tried to retain that sense, you'd have to do a lot more copy pasting and nested quoting, but that doesn't seem like a good use of time, which leads me to think that the concept you had here was a miscarriage.

Making things worse is your repeated failure to get a dumb joke that still had to be explained to you, because you need to convince everyone that you're around average intelligence... as you fail to spell "appreciation" right.

...5/10, I'm a sucker for flattery.
Lol, a keeper, he generates a lot of salt.
Fortified with iodine, so you don't get gout.

...not sure if that's too useful for Americans, who have zero problem with getting enough iodized salt.
 
Making things worse is your repeated failure to get a dumb joke that still had to be explained to you, because you need to convince everyone that you're around average intelligence... as you fail to spell "appreciation" right.
Fixed. Thanks for that.
 
On the other hand, if you tried to retain that sense, you'd have to do a lot more copy pasting and nested quoting, but that doesn't seem like a good use of time, which leads me to think that the concept you had here was a miscarriage.

Making things worse is your repeated failure to get a dumb joke that still had to be explained to you, because you need to convince everyone that you're around average intelligence..
Where is the "joke" when you took a thread and turned it into your personal essay generator because they don't align with your research?

If you have to explain a joke, it's not funny.
 
Where is the "joke" when you took a thread and turned it into your personal essay generator because they don't align with your research?
The more I read this, the less sense it makes.

The "dumb joke" is me not having an X chromosome, which was confused(?) with Klinefelter's. But that has nothing to do with "turning [the thread] into [my] personal essay generator". And I didn't make essays because of comments that didn't "align with my research"-- you even quoted me asking for women to talk about what they thought were the bases of female power fantasies.

Laughing at me for being retarded and pointlessly wrestling with all manner of empty insults because I failed to not take myself seriously is... well, I'm not going to act as though you need permission to take the piss. But if you're going to talk about what I said in the process, actually talk about what I said, and be coherent about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom