View attachment 2563896
I cannot for the
life of me understand why people pay money to commission cover art for their vanity-publishing book (even if the initial artwork looked like the most blatant paintover I'd ever seen with furries added), and then manage to put the most crude, awkward 'dropped this into a website template that had 0 customization' typography across the damn thing. A cover illustrator who has the least idea of what they're doing designs the entire composition with typography in mind; even though this person really didn't, because it was clearly just an illustration commission that was hamfisted onto the cover with no regard to whether it actually worked well, there's even space in the composition where it COULD have worked. Did they use it? Of course not.
And also use either your real name or your furfag name, not both. Doubly so if you type it with special random caps letters that look like a password requirement or a Homestuck larper.
I don't understand how this tweet is theoretically supposed to play out. If he's at home and wants to go out but doesn't have an umbrella, it's not like he can magically make one appear at home; he'd still have to go to the story and get wet on the way. If he's at the store, why does it matter that he didn't have one at home? And if he was home and walked to the store in the rain anyways, he's already wet.
You're a retard, Lou, you probably saw some 12y/o opening up $5-6 deformed weasel headshots.