Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
I love how Russ is trying to cite the FAQ as proof that Null is "inducing" copyright infringement. By that logic, Instagram is liable for Russell's harassment of Erika and others, by allowing Russ to send them super cool flirty DMs.
So is he saying here that the primary appeal of the Farms is that people can come here for bootlegged Russ content? That's the "draw for customers"?
What, you mean it's not the draw? I don't know about you but that's all I joined here for. In fact I was so excited to steal Russell's content, I joined years before he even started to produce anything, just so I could be absolutely sure I wouldn't miss anything!
 
I love how Russ is trying to cite the FAQ as proof that Null is "inducing" copyright infringement. By that logic, Instagram is liable for Russell's harassment of Erika and others, by allowing Russ to send them super cool flirty DMs.

What, you mean it's not the draw? I don't know about you but that's all I joined here for. In fact I was so excited to steal Russell's content, I joined years before he even started to produce anything, just so I could be absolutely sure I wouldn't miss anything!
It's true, I registered because of the flyers posted all around my town advertising KF as a place to get free illegal pirated Russell Greer jingles
 
Guess he did. I can't read. But the claims got kicked along with everything else.

Russell is too much of a ignorant fool to realize his book automatically put a flashing sign over his head.
All the news sites carrying his "I sued Taylor Swift" lawsuit didnt help and He also talks about how reddit hurt his feelings in his book in an email to one of TS people. Why doesnt he sue them or Rackets..No he goes after this site and Dear Leader because all his bullshit is cataloged here.
I so want NULL to get as much cash for damages so shit lips will have to beg a street girl to bang him.
Don't forget, he was BEGGING the media to cover his later suits against her and Ariana. He finally got attention from hookers, the people he was desperate for recognition from, and it was bad, so he went into lockdown. He has NO idea how bad the harassment would be if he became more widely known. Swifties, AG fans, random nuts who harass people who get news articles written about them, he'd have to go completely dark.
I love how Russ is trying to cite the FAQ as proof that Null is "inducing" copyright infringement. By that logic, Instagram is liable for Russell's harassment of Erika and others, by allowing Russ to send them super cool flirty DMs.

What, you mean it's not the draw? I don't know about you but that's all I joined here for. In fact I was so excited to steal Russell's content, I joined years before he even started to produce anything, just so I could be absolutely sure I wouldn't miss anything!
I set up a fucking bittorrent tracker so we could steal his stuff! Do I get any recognition? NO! I'm gonna sue him for hurting my feelings and being more disabled than me!
I love how Russ is trying to cite the FAQ as proof that Null is "inducing" copyright infringement. By that logic, Instagram is liable for Russell's harassment of Erika and others, by allowing Russ to send them super cool flirty DMs.
I was hoping Erika would sue him after he plead guilty to harassing her, but I guess she doesn't want to do anything to gain his attention. Maybe he'll harass one of the US based sex workers who piled on him after @my lovely trauma lumps exposed him as a potential threat to them. I know criminal charges are more serious than being sued, but he really didn't lose anything by pleading guilty. All he had to do was get a psych eval(which he apparently did since the court hasn't found him in violation of his probation) and not get in trouble again for 18 months, which he seems to be doing by moving to Vegas so he's far away from Erika. According to the Kiwi who broke the news he was being charged criminally, his parents footed the bill for the lawyer, so he's not out any money. I want someone to take his money so he can't hire hookers or produce his "songs." That will actually make him feel pain. I know Null said he wasn't going to try to go for legal fees and such because you can't squeeze blood from a turnip, but I hope someone hits him in the wallet which I think is the only thing that will actually hurt him short of actual jail time.
 
Last edited:
The normal way to usea rule 59 motion is to set up your appeal. The thing that actually gets appealed is the denial of the new trial motion. In that motion you can make your legal arguments more clear and more specific so that the appeals court has very clear questions before it.

One other reason to bring a rule 59 motion is to correct something like a math error or a mixed up name.

Russ is just trying to do a motion to reconsider. Those are allowed, but almost always fail unless you have a strange circumstance like a new appeals court decision that no one knew about at trial.

Russ never addresses the standards for when one of these motions are granted. I hope Skordas has some 10th Circuit boilerplate he can just paste in and not have to take too much time customizing the response.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping Erika would sue him after he plead guilty to harassing her, but I guess she doesn't want to do anything to gain his attention. Maybe he'll harass one of the US based sex workers who piled on him after @my lovely trauma lumps exposed him as a potential threat to them. I know criminal charges are more serious than being sued, but he really didn't lose anything by pleading guilty. All he had to do was get a psych eval(which he apparently did since the court hasn't found him in violation of his probation) and not get in trouble again for 18 months, which he seems to be doing by moving to Vegas so he's far away from Erika. According to the Kiwi who broke the news he was being charged criminally, his parents footed the bill for the lawyer, so he's not out any money. I want someone to take his money so he can't hire hookers or produce his "songs." That will actually make him feel pain. I know Null said he wasn't going to try to go for legal fees and such because you can't squeeze blood from a turnip, but I hope someone hits him in the wallet which I think is the only thing that will actually hurt him short of actual jail time.
It might not have cost Russ anything in material terms, but there's no doubt it put even more strain on an already difficult relationship with his adoptive parents. What I wouldn't give to have been a fly on the wall in the lawyer's office when Russ wanted to go to trial, or on phone calls with Ma and Pa Greer. He learned absolutely nothing from that, which means he's eventually going to get himself in a situation that his parents can't get him out of.

Legal Kiwis: can wages be garnished to pay for sanctions?
 
. We're not calling him up and screaming about Taylor Swift, or anything else. We don't need to. Leave him alone long enough and he does SOMETHING to grab the spotlight and his thread grows another 100 pages.
Um, excuse me, did you forget about poor Ken already? He's mutilated for LIFE.

Also, I forgot to put gas in the Jetta. Sorry, fam.
 
It's short of an appeal. It's meant to be for if the judge obviously fucked up and you're just pointing it out in the hopes that she will say "ah, fuck, I copy pasted the wrong thing there" and fix it. It's futile here as Russ is trying to re-litigate his case without actually filing an appeal.
The most recent good example of this kind of a motion working is in the case of the Covington kid versus the Times/CNN (?). It was dismissed, the kid's lawyer asked for a reconsideration based on misapplication of the law, the judge said OH SHÏT U RIGHT and reversed part of his decision.

This judge ain't gonna do that here. Lol
 
Don't we get a volume discount? If so, I say we just do all of 'em at once. Might as well get it out of the way and ensure Russ never wins a lawsuit, ever.
Can you slide some cash to a criminal court judge in Memphis? There was an unfortunate misunderstanding with a Swedish masseuse and a commercial demolitions company.
 
"Greer, however, explained how Moon’s views on Fair Use were wrong..."
:story:

Oh, Greer.
Moon didn't even make a fair use defense. The motion to dismiss the copyright claim was premised on the fact that he never "cause[d] or materially contribute[d] to another’s infringing activities[.]" Nor did Russhole even plead this in the first place.
 
Can you slide some cash to a criminal court judge in Memphis? There was an unfortunate misunderstanding with a Swedish masseuse and a commercial demolitions company.
Again?!?

Fine, I'll move some stuff around, but this is THE LAST TIME, capiche?

We need to focus our efforts on fucking up Russ's life by thwarting his dreams of stardom/winning lawsuits, and keeping Josh in banana peppers and pizza. And you know how our Dear Leader likes his banana peppers and pizza.
 
But what truly sells Jono over Russ is Jono is a good person and a true disability activist with his own charity, he visits children suffering from the same condition as himself and doesn't harass people who tell him no, including his birth parents.
And that's the difference. Jono has a terrible disability. I mean you might think that not having cheekbones isn't that big a deal but without them you have no face but he's really not let it keep him down. He also managed to be successful and has a hot girlfriend. Why? He's not an asshole.

Personally I've always admired Nicholas James Vujicic. He was born with no arms or legs and only has one... flipper I guess you can call it that he uses to manipulate things. He's married to a pretty woman and has four kids with her. This guy has gone skydiving, swimming and plays golf. Of course he's a motivational speaker. And he's a nice guy in that he is genuinely a nice person.

The 13 'respectfully's randomly dotted through this in inappropriate places are my favorite part. That and his bizarre use of 'kindly'. What does he even think it's doing in there? He KINDLY asks for the court to grant his motion? Does he think the adverb means 'in a super nice guy sort of way'? Because to the rest of us it reads like 'in a super patronizing kid of way, there's a silly dear'.

View attachment 2580920
He's still waiting to be able to explain his side of things to the judge not understanding that a judge isn't looking for that. They want the facts, not one person's version of the facts,
 
So, before I go any further, I feel there is only one response to be had to Russell Greer's most recent filing.
e8a.gif

Maybe he's been playing Bioshock.
I just tabbed away from Bioshock to catch up on this thread, and that was my exact thought.
If we are being technical Russ will never take his life. Too much of a narcissist to commit an hero.
That's quitter talk, we can bully WAY harder if we wanted to! Though we would be running the risk of getting our own threads, called dumb nigger faggots, and ridiculed for direct interaction with a cow, as if there is one guideline we do half ass enforce, it's "No trolling plans." Still, Russ, like many others, don't understand our primary goal. We want him to keep being a retarded waste of oxygen for as long as possible. Why? Because Russell Greer alive is more funny than Russell Greer dead. Keep posting everything online Russell. Keep doing stupid shit that pisses off the courts. Keep ruining your own life.
 
So is this even an appeal? Or is he just using a lot of words (incorrectly) to tell the judge she doesn't know how to do her job?
He dumbly calls it a "motion to reopen case and alter judgment" and so far as I know, there is no such thing. Others have filed things called that and similar things from time to time, but what it really is, and will be taken as, is a motion to alter or amend a judgment pursuant to FRCP 59(e), essentially serving the same purpose as a motion for reconsideration in a state court.

The court may under this rule "correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment is based." McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1999). There are no such manifest errors, nor errors at all. Russhole is continuing to argue about Fair Use, which isn't relevant. He never established that contributory infringement occurred at all, and the defense never even raised Fair Use. He's arguing against a phantom and never even got over the hurdle of establishing any kind of secondary liability could even exist. He never even pled it in his complaint.
 
Again?!?

Fine, I'll move some stuff around, but this is THE LAST TIME, capiche?

We need to focus our efforts on fucking up Russ's life by thwarting his dreams of stardom/winning lawsuits, and keeping Josh in banana peppers and pizza. And you know how our Dear Leader likes his banana peppers and pizza.
Thank you. Also, if the Tennessee Bureau of investigation asks, you haven't seen me in months.
 
It’s absolutely not a real appeal. He’s trying to EXPLAIN to the original judge why she should change her ruling voluntarily. A real appeal is filed in the court of appeals and it’s purpose is to overturn a judges decision.
It's a motion for reconsideration. It is pointless, has no chance of sucess. (Has a motion asking a court to reconsider it's judgement ever worked?) But may be seeking to preserve some elements of Russel's stupidity for appeal. It's just another form of legal harassement. The only good thing about it is since once again Russ is seeking to inject bad faith bullshit into things, it may piss off the Judge enough to entertain fee requests.

:story:

It's really fun that Russell thinks that making absolutely unproven criminal allegations about KF will help his civil suit. Even if KF had been convicted of Mean Shit, First Degree, it still couldn't be used as evidence in a civil case.

Adorably, he thinks the NYT describing the site as "the web's biggest community of stalkers" is like winning a stalking Oscar or getting certified by the International Stalker Website Council. If there were truly a competition, Facebook would sweep every category.
The counter to that is Skordas once again pointing out that Mr. Greer is in fact a Convicted Stalker. Neither Mr. Moon nor Kiwi Farms have that legal distinction.
 
It's a motion. Skordas needs to file an opposition in 14 days.
He doesn't actually need to, unless the court requests it, but he probably will. Russ has a heavy burden to overcome before the defense even needs to respond, and he's nowhere near it. It's not like this is something he defaults on if he doesn't. But if he does, he'd be entirely justified moving for fees on having more time wasted on this bullshit. Russ has already had a shot across the bow about his frivolous bullshit, and apparently he didn't take the hint.
It was dismissed, the kid's lawyer asked for a reconsideration based on misapplication of the law, the judge said OH SHÏT U RIGHT and reversed part of his decision.
That was a rare case of such a motion actually working. It's not that such motions never work, it's that they're often filed when there's no real basis for them, sometimes seemingly just to toll the deadline to file an actual appeal.
I think this is a poorly worded motion to reconsider. I doubt the judge will, though.

He is.

Rule 24 of appellate procedure should grant it automatically.

"A party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action, or who was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense in a criminal case, may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization,"

"UNLESS:

(A) the district court—before or after the notice of appeal is filed—certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and states in writing its reasons for the certification or finding[.]" Fed. R. App. 24(a)(3)(A) (emphasis added).

This is what happened to Melinda Scott for an appeal no more frivolous than what Russhole is attempting.
Russ is just trying to do a motion to reconsider.
It's technically not called that, although you'll often see motions captioned as that and they are generally treated as whatever they actually are substantively, which is usually a motion under FRCP 59 and sometimes FRCP 60, depending on the nature of the relief sought.
 
Last edited:
Back