Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Space Cooter]

LOL JUST what I was thinking! I am shaking my head laughing and trying to decide who fucks up the law with their head-canon the most? Rapey Russ or Mountain Jewess?

It's hard to tell but I think I have to give it to Smelly Melly here, because Russ at least has SOME other interests besides suing Null. He has his plights, his hooker-plowing (FROM ALL SIDES!), his celeb-wooing music and of course, his doomed PAC.

Melinda has literally nothing else going for her. She pops out welfare-sprogs and clogs up the courts with self-made problems to hide her complete failure at life from herself, because it's all she CAN do.

Melinda's rage-lawyering is more troubling because she has a half dozen broken kids with fetal alcohol syndrome in her immediate vicinity.

The only thing Russ can beat up on is that poor casio keyboard.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Melinda's rage-lawyering is more troubling because she has a half dozen broken kids with fetal alcohol syndrome in her immediate vicinity.

The only thing Russ can beat up on is that poor casio keyboard.

Russ will abandon a lost cause and move on to his next litigation victim once the court smacks him down a bit. Melinda will never ever abandon a target. She is the textbook case study of a vexatious litigant. She does not and will not accept a courts decision, any courts decision. She is so incredibly obsessive over imagined slights that she will never abandon this crusade short of a court actually jailing her. If even then.

 

[Toasty]

Her recounting of the Buchanan Co. Case that she brought against her landlord reads like a fucking comedy sketch. She was 20 minutes late to an action she initiated, but it's not her fault because it was a long drive, it was raining and she was pregnant. It was decided against her because she had in fact signed a contract. But it wasn't a valid contract because she said so. She couldn't remember the statute because dammit she was wet from riding in a car for 2 hours in the rain while pregnant. But neither did the judge. A clerk failed to know automatically that she had filed ifp and treated her like a normal person, the horror! She sent a writ of mandamus, an very drastic action almost never taken, and was so circumspect that she sent it to the wrong court. Eventually, as usual her case was dismissed. But not because it had no merit!! Oh, no, it was because she was too busy being pregnant (did she mention that she was pregnant?) Then she had to give birth and you guessed it... BREASTFEED.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Her recounting of the Buchanan Co. Case that she brought against her landlord reads like a fucking comedy sketch. She was 20 minutes late to an action she initiated, but it's not her fault because it was a long drive, it was raining and she was pregnant. It was decided against her because she had in fact signed a contract. But it wasn't a valid contract because she said so. She couldn't remember the statute because dammit she was wet from riding in a car for 2 hours in the rain while pregnant. But neither did the judge. A clerk failed to know automatically that she had filed ifp and treated her like a normal person, the horror! She sent a writ of mandamus, an very drastic action almost never taken, and was so circumspect that she sent it to the wrong court. Eventually, as usual her case was dismissed. But not because it had no merit!! Oh, no, it was because she was too busy being pregnant (did she mention that she was pregnant?) Then she had to give birth and you guessed it... BREASTFEED.

The only thing missing from this story is her swinging the baby like a club at the judge

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Has she even left Marhsall yet?

They were acting like two lovebirds in Nick's chat so my guess would be either no or they are back together.

She is way off her rocker now.Claiming Null is using bad faith in his reply filings.
She is so self projecting . Her lunacy is too out of control.

I think she kind-of learned what bad faith is from Hardin's documents and tries to use it in her own filings.

Now who is the worst paralegal..Mel or Russ?

Let's see...
Russhole
Legal education: basic (paralegal training)
Understanding of the law: minimal (knows basic concepts but fails to utilize this knowledge)
Litigation style: begging for sympathy, probably believes he's in the right

Mel
Legal education: none (dropped out after one semester)
Understanding of the law: minimal (learns as she goes)
Litigation style: rage-filing, revenge-filing

So my verdict would be: Mel is worse as she lacks any kind of education in the field of law, files with malicious intent and fails to apply proper law to her case (like in the most recent war against the judge document) probably due to poor learning skills.

I’m trying to imagine a world in which Russel and Melinda start suing each other. It’s probably the Judicial equivalent of hell.

This could only end in two places: mental health institution or Las Vegas bedroom.

Who is crazy enough to believe the other one has wronged them without actually wronging them?

Melinda sues people she had at least minimal interaction with. Russ sues people that don't know he even exists. So my bed would be on Russ.

She was 20 minutes late to an action she initiated, but it's not her fault because it was a long drive, it was raining and she was pregnant.

This reminds me of a certain transcript...

 

[RodgerDodger]

I think she kind-of learned what bad faith is from Hardin's documents and tries to use it in her own filings.

That's her MO. How she "Learns the Law". So parrot's whatever somebody files against her. She now has been taught the term "Bad Faith" so she will shriek BAD FAITH!!! in every filing until she picks up the term "Vexatious" next. She has no idea what Bad Faith actually means or how or where it is applicable. I would suggest that if she honestly wanted to learn, she should simply read her own filings.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

@TamarYaelBatYah Do you and Marshall have a chore chart like this? The man is rewarded with sex favors by his wife if he does those chores. Id have one too, but instead of "BJ!!!!" Id request one prolapsed asshole suck. Id lightly squat down and push my entire smol intestine out and ask her to go to town.

View attachment 2614952

Is she not reading the emotions on her husband's face? He's clearly not happy with this idea. I'm not taking his side because he's a man. I'm calling this a bad idea because of what it says about women's sexuality.

I think this is a bad idea if the punishment/reward concept for not equally being a "giver" to his wife in the relationship is based on sexual withholding/sexual rewards.

First issue with that, is it denies her the pleasure of sex (and sexual activity) as well. She seems to think sex (and sexual activity) is something you give a man rather than sex (and sexual activity) being something you mutually participate in as a woman, or even just take for yourself as a woman at times. Everyone deserves some days where they can be the "taker" in the sack. Nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not all the time.

I see that she's a product of internalized misogyny in that she sees sex and sexual activity as a chore and a thing you give away to a man. It's like when people say a woman has "lost her virginity". It's like, where was the woman during all that? Gaining the experience and pleasure of sex, you didn't lose anything. It's like, welcome to the better side!

She might also think sex is a chore or obligation because she's not in touch with her own sexuality and doesn't know how to manufacture her own fantasies and desires. The concept of female desire for a man is suppressed and under developed in her. Sex therapy could help her with that. Not listening to society helps too. This mentality she has could also possibly be because she has a low libido due to bad diet, lack of enorphins, some kind of birth control, or social conditioning. As long as a woman continues to believe sex is a man thing, he ability to desire sex, enjoy sex and control her sexuality will be thwarted.

Sex should be an almost daily thing between a couple in order to connect and it should not be used for reward/punishment. A BJ should definitely not be thought of as a reward. It's part of a mutual sexual experience that brings you closer to your husband. A desire to make his life better by sexual satisfaction, seeing that pleasure on his face. The woman should be into the BJ as much as he is into receiving the pleasure, it certainly shouldn't be a "chore". Who wants their spouse acting like it's a chore? It's normal for younger women under 25 not to initiate desire, they usually have to be seduced and coached during sex, but this woman looks over 30, so she's at the age where she should be initiating and pursuing sex with her man more aggressively. She's sexually repressed in her mind, for any of the reasons I said above.

Anyhow, I think the rewards should be other things like cooking his favorite meal. She has beer on there, that's cool. If Marshall acts up I withhold food. I don't withhold sex, I will communicate to him though when his behavior is becoming a sexual turnoff for me, and let him know that I'm not in the mood that day because he's getting on my nerves. Even still, I might still fuck him if I'm angry because I need the sex that particular day. If he's really acting up I make him scrape around and make his own dinner if he really makes me mad. If he's being loving and not neglecting me I'll make him 5 star meals. Marshall likes my cooking. He says I should open my own restaurant because my cooking is so good.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Welcome back, Mel. How are you?

 

[obsdj]

purple monkey dishwasher

*yoinky screenshot sound*

 

[Toasty]

Is she not reading the emotions on her husband's face? He's clearly not happy with this idea. I'm not taking his side because he's a man. I'm calling this a bad idea because of what it says about women's sexuality.

I think this is a bad idea if the punishment/reward concept for not equally being a "giver" to his wife in the relationship is based on sexual withholding/sexual rewards.

First issue with that, is it denies her the pleasure of sex (and sexual activity) as well. She seems to think sex (and sexual activity) is something you give a man rather than sex (and sexual activity) being something you mutually participate in as a woman, or even just take for yourself as a woman at times. Everyone deserves some days where they can be the "taker" in the sack. Nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not all the time.

I see that she's a product of internalized misogyny in that she sees sex and sexual activity as a chore and a thing you give away to a man. It's like when people say a woman has "lost her virginity". It's like, where was the woman during all that? Gaining the experience and pleasure of sex, you didn't lose anything. It's like, welcome to the better side!

She might also think sex is a chore or obligation because she's not in touch with her own sexuality and doesn't know how to manufacture her own fantasies and desires. The concept of female desire for a man is suppressed and under developed in her. Sex therapy could help her with that. Not listening to society helps too. This mentality she has could also possibly be because she has a low libido due to bad diet, lack of enorphins, some kind of birth control, or social conditioning. As long as a woman continues to believe sex is a man thing, he ability to desire sex, enjoy sex and control her sexuality will be thwarted.

Sex should be an almost daily thing between a couple in order to connect and it should not be used for reward/punishment. A BJ should definitely not be thought of as a reward. It's part of a mutual sexual experience that brings you closer to your husband. A desire to make his life better by sexual satisfaction, seeing that pleasure on his face. The woman should be into the BJ as much as he is into receiving the pleasure, it certainly shouldn't be a "chore". Who wants their spouse acting like it's a chore? It's normal for younger women under 25 not to initiate desire, they usually have to be seduced and coached during sex, but this woman looks over 30, so she's at the age where she should be initiating and pursuing sex with her man more aggressively. She's sexually repressed in her mind, for any of the reasons I said above.

Anyhow, I think the rewards should be other things like cooking his favorite meal. She has beer on there, that's cool. If Marshall acts up I withhold food. I don't withhold sex, I will communicate to him though when his behavior is becoming a sexual turnoff for me, and let him know that I'm not in the mood that day because he's getting on my nerves. Even still, I might still fuck him if I'm angry because I need the sex that particular day. If he's really acting up I make him scrape around and make his own dinner if he really makes me mad. If he's being loving and not neglecting me I'll make him 5 star meals. Marshall likes my cooking. He says I should open my own restaurant because my cooking is so good.

The picture was a joke, a meme, not a snapshot of someone's actual relationship. You just spent a whole giant post proving that you cannot read actual social cues and are a black hole where humor goes to die.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Welcome back, Mel. How are you?

Still losing and still a failure.

 

[Rabid Weasels]

Is she not reading the emotions on her husband's face? He's clearly not happy with this idea. I'm not taking his side because he's a man. I'm calling this a bad idea because of what it says about women's sexuality.

I think this is a bad idea if the punishment/reward concept for not equally being a "giver" to his wife in the relationship is based on sexual withholding/sexual rewards.

First issue with that, is it denies her the pleasure of sex (and sexual activity) as well. She seems to think sex (and sexual activity) is something you give a man rather than sex (and sexual activity) being something you mutually participate in as a woman, or even just take for yourself as a woman at times. Everyone deserves some days where they can be the "taker" in the sack. Nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not all the time.

I see that she's a product of internalized misogyny in that she sees sex and sexual activity as a chore and a thing you give away to a man. It's like when people say a woman has "lost her virginity". It's like, where was the woman during all that? Gaining the experience and pleasure of sex, you didn't lose anything. It's like, welcome to the better side!

She might also think sex is a chore or obligation because she's not in touch with her own sexuality and doesn't know how to manufacture her own fantasies and desires. The concept of female desire for a man is suppressed and under developed in her. Sex therapy could help her with that. Not listening to society helps too. This mentality she has could also possibly be because she has a low libido due to bad diet, lack of enorphins, some kind of birth control, or social conditioning. As long as a woman continues to believe sex is a man thing, he ability to desire sex, enjoy sex and control her sexuality will be thwarted.

Sex should be an almost daily thing between a couple in order to connect and it should not be used for reward/punishment. A BJ should definitely not be thought of as a reward. It's part of a mutual sexual experience that brings you closer to your husband. A desire to make his life better by sexual satisfaction, seeing that pleasure on his face. The woman should be into the BJ as much as he is into receiving the pleasure, it certainly shouldn't be a "chore". Who wants their spouse acting like it's a chore? It's normal for younger women under 25 not to initiate desire, they usually have to be seduced and coached during sex, but this woman looks over 30, so she's at the age where she should be initiating and pursuing sex with her man more aggressively. She's sexually repressed in her mind, for any of the reasons I said above.

Anyhow, I think the rewards should be other things like cooking his favorite meal. She has beer on there, that's cool. If Marshall acts up I withhold food. I don't withhold sex, I will communicate to him though when his behavior is becoming a sexual turnoff for me, and let him know that I'm not in the mood that day because he's getting on my nerves. Even still, I might still fuck him if I'm angry because I need the sex that particular day. If he's really acting up I make him scrape around and make his own dinner if he really makes me mad. If he's being loving and not neglecting me I'll make him 5 star meals. Marshall likes my cooking. He says I should open my own restaurant because my cooking is so good.

What's his favorite meal? Bad Faith Meatloaf? Vexatious Taco Tuesdays?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Still losing and still a failure.

Shush! I kinda missed her, don't drive her away!

 

[Kosher Salt]

Shush! I kinda missed her, don't drive her away!

You know she really comes for the abuse.

 

[CyrusKissFanClub]

If he's being loving and not neglecting me I'll make him 5 star meals. Marshall likes my cooking. He says I should open my own restaurant because my cooking is so good.

Neither you nor Marshall has ever eaten at a restaurant with 3 Michelin stars. You have no clue about good food. And you don't cook Ashkenazi, Sephardic, or Mizrahi food. You cook white trash pig slop. You and Marshall are fat but the children look scrawny and underfed. The children aren't even getting their fair share of pig swill.

 

[obliviousbeard]

The children aren't even getting their fair share of pig swill

I really hope she doesn't use food as a control measure with her kids, like she does with Marshall.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

@TamarYaelBatYah Don't go. I heard Russell Greer was going to start stalking you in hopes of getting a date. You should sue him to prevent this

 

[Space Cooter]

Why on earth would you come back to post that?

Did Marshall smack you in your rent maker again?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Why on earth would you come back to post that?

Did Marshall smack you in your rent maker again?

She's hoping one of us says something nasty so she can cut and paste it into her appeals filing due Monday. Don't take the bait.

KF clearly distresses Mel so much that she feels it necesary and appropriate to come here unprompted and share intimate details of her and Marshall's sex life. Which nobody asked for. Nobody would ever ask for. Y'know Mel, normal people don't do that. Ever.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

She's hoping one of us says something nasty so she can cut and paste it into her appeals filing due Monday. Don't take the bait.

KF clearly distresses Mel so much that she feels it necesary and appropriate to come here unprompted and share intimate details of her and Marshall's sex life. Which nobody asked for. Nobody would ever ask for. Y'know Mel, normal people don't do that. Ever.

Oh so what you are saying is there *is* a chance she clips my post and adds Russell Greer to the case?