This x100. I have to explain to people from the Midwest how truly crazy California is. It is really easy to underestimate how insane they really are.
@Gehenna can you elaborate on what actions from big tech are more in line with being greedy/power-hungry rather than crazy woke?
It's in large part how they go about the business. The most iconic one is Zuckerberg, so I'll use him as the example, The man fairly regularly talks to conservative pundits, with five separate meetings since 2013 on the record. This may not sound like a lot, but is five more than most -politicians- on the left do. These meetings are not unique to Facebook either, Facebook just gets lambasted the most.
So we have anear-annual meetings with the 'other side', which knocks some holes in him being an ideologue. Can we knock some more holes in this? Yes. His continued, albeit tepid, resistance to further locking down his platform, the repeated attempts to weasel around new Party mandates, the placement of people and institutions by him that serve only to slow down Party efforts without actually -doing- anything. All these indicate that he isn't in ideological lockstep with the Party.
But that doesn't provide a picture of his motivations, only what doesn't motivate him. Can we piece together that? Again, yes.
A constant attempt to gain more user information, the investment of his own capital into projects which don't have an ideological lense but let him tighten control of his users/his influence/his own people. The very carefully formed image of himself (The idea of him as a robot is -intentional-) which shows him apart from others, the absolutely obscene wealth he generates and rather pointedly doesn't share. Zuckerberg specifically isn't known for his philanthropy, in fact if you want to get money from him 'donated', you have to work for him. And that work is very rarely... in fact almost never ideological.
So we have someone who is constantly toeing but never embracing the party line, whose every action has been to gain power or money.
Now, this is far from an exhaustive list of what indicates either bit here, but I hope it helps paint the picture better.
on topic, I thought of a little story to illustrate the unreality of the idea that the Tech Lords will go GOP.
Oh for the love of.
Nobody said they were going GOP. Anybody who does say they are going GOP is an idiot. If that's what you thought I said you need to stop listening to the Armstrong guy. I said, rather explicitly, that going GOP is not an option. What I -did- say was that they might make a backroom deal that will mitigate the damage to themselves by tossing others buswards.