Baked Alaska / Tim Treadstone / Tim Gionet / Anthime Joseph Gionet - White rapper, alt-right "activist", ex-Buzzfeed contributor; got arrested at the March for Trump, and a federal snitch

What is it about baked that makes him so cathartic to a-log?

It doesn’t matter who you are, what your beliefs are, what your political alignment is. He’s just in a perpetual state of being owned and it’s magnificent to watch. A modern day Greek tragedy.
It's because nothing about him is genuine. He will latch onto whatever movement is trending at the time in an effort to elevate himself, but will always fall on his face due to his own hubris and stupidity.
 
View attachment 2689524

Cope Seethe Dilate fatlaska
southpark-i-thought-thiswas-america.gif
 
What is it about baked that makes him so cathartic to a-log?

It doesn’t matter who you are, what your beliefs are, what your political alignment is. He’s just in a perpetual state of being owned and it’s magnificent to watch. A modern day Greek tragedy.
I feel the same way about Russell Greer. I have found myself befriending people all over the political map with our shared distaste. And all for the right reasons.

Folks of this variety are good for one thing: being great unifiers.
 
Thank Yahweh the might of the great Israeli supporting US Government is taking the time and resources to prosecute this notorious neo-nazi for his blatant assault on the ancient and revered Chosen People. Those flimsy fairweather cardboard signs are representative of our morals and beliefs and should be respected

Hail Israel
 
That isn't really the case, though. Those were civil rights laws, specifically the one now codified at 18 U.S.C. § 241, which as subsequently modified by Congress provides:

This is (part of) what used to be called the Klan Act, as it prohibited activities the Klan was engaged in, but you will note there is no language about the motivation of the person who does it, or even any special protection for the category of people it was, at the time, aimed at protecting.

Anyone who does this kind of thing to anyone is guilty of a crime, regardless of their motivation.

Hate crimes are an entirely different concept, and in uncivilized countries, actively criminalize things that wouldn't even be crimes without such statutes.

And in the United States, while they aren't as bad as that, they still enhance penalties solely because of the races of the victim and perpetrator. They're not supposed to, they're supposed to be based on bias motivation (and would still be bad even under that theory), but in actuality, they privilege those seen as minorities. Minorities can outright torture and murder a white person while yelling about how much they hate white people and prosecutors will refuse to prosecute it as a hate crime.
What would be bad about a bias motivation? If we're considering the (now archaic) existence of sundown towns, black people in those places would be particularly vulnerable. I don't see the problem with a law that enhanced penalties for crimes committed deliberately to target a demographic that is uniquely vulnerable in situations like that. I see it just like laws that provide enhanced penalties for violence against, say, bus drivers.

I know that, in practice, such laws have been pretty garbage. Inconsistently applied, for example. (Like I would imagine that many prosecutors would be unlikely to prosecute a BHI member attacking a Jew as a hate crime. This is why everyone, including Jews, should be arming themselves.)

But just from a theory perspective, I don't see the problem.
Eh

Eh, Joe Arpaio kinda sinks this idea for me. Everything else was on point, though.
Well there's pockets here and there. Sometimes particularly disturbing pockets.

Just saying we're gone from the days where your average black man has to worry about being lynched for wolf whistling at a white woman.
 
I know that, in practice, such laws have been pretty garbage.
It's because they're inevitably so. It isn't something avoidable. A bias that is not itself criminal should not be used to determine guilt. If it should be taken into account, it is after guilt has been determined, when such issues as likelihood of reoffense (i.e. danger to community) and aggravating and mitigating circumstances like a particularly vile or (on the contrary) understandable motive come into play.

Think of it this way. Suppose you have two people and they have both assaulted someone. They are both guilty. One assaulted a man who fucked his wife. He has otherwise never been violent. The other assaulted a man for no reason other than that he was black.

Who is the first man a danger to? Pretty much another man who fucks his wife. Who is the second man a danger to? An entire demographic. So when you're calculating a sentence, and the likelihood of reoffense is an issue, that's the time to take such things into consideration. They have absolutely nothing to do with the ultimate fact of guilt, and bringing them into play then just muddies the water and prejudices the jury against the defendant.

This is entirely by design.
 
What is it about baked that makes him so cathartic to a-log?

It doesn’t matter who you are, what your beliefs are, what your political alignment is. He’s just in a perpetual state of being owned and it’s magnificent to watch. A modern day Greek tragedy.
it's because he smugly films himself being a victim constantly. nobody likes that.

and when he's not being a victim, he finds a way such as macing himself
 
How many layers of internet edge do you have to be on before you think taking down an innocent little Hanukkah sign is some kind of "own" to anybody? What a loser lol

Do you seriously think the DA in the Arizona county where the Sheriff was Joe Arpaio AKA "John Wayne but more racist" for 25 years is on some SJW antifa shit trying to railroad Baked for his political beliefs? Not likely
The sheriff that replaced Arpaio is Paul Penzone who is a lefty. Phoenix is at least 50% cucked. The city's been swarmed with Californians over the last ten years.
 
Last edited:
What is it about baked that makes him so cathartic to a-log?

It doesn’t matter who you are, what your beliefs are, what your political alignment is. He’s just in a perpetual state of being owned and it’s magnificent to watch. A modern day Greek tragedy.

Seeing this absolute waste of air face consequences is not cathartic.

It is a shred of justice, if even that.
 
What would be bad about a bias motivation? If we're considering the (now archaic) existence of sundown towns, black people in those places would be particularly vulnerable. I don't see the problem with a law that enhanced penalties for crimes committed deliberately to target a demographic that is uniquely vulnerable in situations like that. I see it just like laws that provide enhanced penalties for violence against, say, bus drivers.

I know that, in practice, such laws have been pretty garbage. Inconsistently applied, for example. (Like I would imagine that many prosecutors would be unlikely to prosecute a BHI member attacking a Jew as a hate crime. This is why everyone, including Jews, should be arming themselves.)

But just from a theory perspective, I don't see the problem.

Well there's pockets here and there. Sometimes particularly disturbing pockets.

Just saying we're gone from the days where your average black man has to worry about being lynched for wolf whistling at a white woman.
"i don't see the problem with completely abandoning the notion of equality before the law"
then you're either retarded, or malicious.
 
It's because nothing about him is genuine. He will latch onto whatever movement is trending at the time in an effort to elevate himself, but will always fall on his face due to his own hubris and stupidity.
But that’s the thing. The hilarious bit about people obsessed with popularity is how they don’t actually know what’s popular. Groypers are never going to be big!
 
Oy vey! Goyim should know not to mess with The Chosen Ones. Shut HIM down.
Didn't know you master racers were so pro vandalism.
I don't get the far-right's hard-on for weird Jewish conspiracy theories. There *is* a Jewish conspiracy -- to get rich and powerful and look out for their people so they don't get genocided again, and I find that pretty fucking admirable.
B...b...but only the white race is allowed to do thaaaat!

Their argument is that whites prosper in white countries by stealing from niggers. This is demonstrably false, the europoor nations with colonies are far poorer than those who had few or none. Ours is that jews subvert white countries. This is obviously true, and you don't even disagree with that, as you claim their goal is to become "rich and powerful". The rich and powerful do not have our best interests at heart.


According to your narrative they keep getting genocided because everyone fucking hates them. Sounds like they're short sighted.
Click to expand...
Because as we know, when whites get rich and powerful they NEVER victimize other whites or put them behind profit, right?
tumblr_34b9e5eb84c43505fb902dfa0fac81e1_f2d737bf_1280.jpg
 
Last edited:
It's because nothing about him is genuine. He will latch onto whatever movement is trending at the time in an effort to elevate himself, but will always fall on his face due to his own hubris and stupidity.
If that doesn't sound like some shit a modern day Sophocles would write, I don't know what else would be.
 
Thank Yahweh the might of the great Israeli supporting US Government is taking the time and resources to prosecute this notorious neo-nazi for his blatant assault on the ancient and revered Chosen People. Those flimsy fairweather cardboard signs are representative of our morals and beliefs and should be respected

Hail Israel
I don't know what your implying there but we at the Kiwi Farms™ stand with Israel and its people
which is more than i can say for Mr. Gionet
 
Back