US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Im not doing electric, I refuse. If there are only electric cars I wont drive.
Electric cars always look retarded and dumb.
I want a aesthetic gas-powered car that i can drive around my district without having to recharge it every 4 hours at the communal charging ports. Don't like that? You're most likely a faggot and should eat a bag of dicks.
 
I don't understand why 13 Republicans voted for this other than they are swamp people.
I don't either. This isn't new, though. Republicans have had power before in both chambers a few times in the last 20 years, but nothing ever really got better for the citizenry. Everything just led to where we are today.

I don't necessarily trust Republicans just because they aren't Democrats. Sometimes they're just becoming Democrats very slowly.
 
Original study:
science.abm0620-f1.jpg
 
I just saw a video on reddit of a Haitian eating a dead guy in the middle of the street in the middle of the day while people watch; just ripping meat off his leg and chomping it down like a beast. I can't believe there's an army of them waiting at the border for Biden and his demons to let them in. Fuck Democrats and fuck Conan O'Brien. Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Meyers are cunts, but they never tried to get people killed like that ginger monster.


Put a lid on this bucket of crabs and set it to boil. NOW. In Minecraft.
 
Im not doing electric, I refuse. If there are only electric cars I wont drive.

Its time we all become like a new version of the Amish, and live as if nothing progressed or changed after the 20th century. Anything "new" or whatever shit they come up with I will just act as if it was never created. No VR no "plugging in" no digital passport, nothing. Fuck all of them, I am so sick of this shit.
American city planning has been in a "cars over people" mentality for decades now, so good luck walking. A lot of places I've been to dont even have sidewalks. Try to cut across the street when theres no traffic? Enjoy backing the blue with the traffic cop whos been watching your ass the entire time. And weirdly enough I find rural cops take jaywalking way more seriously than urban ones.
 
Why I don’t really find the ”you will live in a pod” agenda credible is that there’s just so many people who would voluntarily move into a densely populated, public transport based city if they could merely afford to do so.

Wouldn’t that demographic be a low hanging fruit to pick up and run with? Cities can’t handle even the voluntary immigration, so there’s no hope for forcing people to live there. If you can’t even build basic bitch low rise multi family homes to fit marginally more people than before, high density ”pods” are far more radical and impractical than that.
 
Why I don’t really find the ”you will live in a pod” agenda credible is that there’s just so many people who would voluntarily move into a densely populated, public transport based city if they could merely afford to do so.

Wouldn’t that demographic be a low hanging fruit to pick up and run with? Cities can’t handle even the voluntary immigration, so there’s no hope for forcing people to live there. If you can’t even build basic bitch low rise multi family homes to fit marginally more people than before, high density ”pods” are far more radical and impractical than that.
Historically, cities were the shitholes that poor people would move to BECAUSE they’re so densely packed, therefore you need less utilities to serve the same amount of people. Cities are SUPPOSED to be affordable, and they would be if it weren’t for the massive real estate bubble.
 
Why I don’t really find the ”you will live in a pod” agenda credible is that there’s just so many people who would voluntarily move into a densely populated, public transport based city if they could merely afford to do so.

Wouldn’t that demographic be a low hanging fruit to pick up and run with? Cities can’t handle even the voluntary immigration, so there’s no hope for forcing people to live there. If you can’t even build basic bitch low rise multi family homes to fit marginally more people than before, high density ”pods” are far more radical and impractical than that.
We're talking about the same people who want to force everyone to drive an electric car despite a massive shortage of chips, charging stations, and a functioning grid for said electric cars and the same people who demand vaccine mandates that make workers quit, get fired, or drop dead of myocarditis in the middle of a massive shortage of labor.

If it's a good policy that makes the elite feel good, then it must be a good policy and will clearly work for everyone once we stop being stupid about it.
 
Historically, cities were the shitholes that poor people would move to BECAUSE they’re so densely packed, therefore you need less utilities to serve the same amount of people. Cities are SUPPOSED to be affordable, and they would be if it weren’t for the massive real estate bubble.
Academia and the elite have been largely composed of Malthusian misanthropes for centuries. They’re largely apathetic and are even disdainful of the average person and the upper class and upper class aspiring generally don’t trend towards actually caring about anybody since they are geared towards trying to be the biggest cog in a machine.
 
I would get an electric car if there was infrastructure in my country for them and they were more affordable. No issue with them, it needs to happen.

What I don't get is, how do people with out driveways or garages easily charge them? In my apartment building, the car park isn't full of power outlets. Nothing is set up for people to charge them while parked.

Charging at home, overnight is the biggest thing to make them practical. As opposed to waiting at charging stations. How long is quick charge? Even at 15 minutes, it's a massive backlog than just replacing pumps at gas stations.

I know plenty of people who only have on street parking. With out a guaranteed spot each day.

I can only figure the plan is for a lot less people to own cars. Probably by not being able to afford them.
 
I would get an electric car if there was infrastructure in my country for them and they were more affordable. No issue with them, it needs to happen.

What I don't get is, how do people with out driveways or garages easily charge them? In my apartment building, the car park isn't full of power outlets. Nothing is set up for people to charge them while parked.

Charging at home, overnight is the biggest thing to make them practical. As opposed to waiting at charging stations. How long is quick charge? Even at 15 minutes, it's a massive backlog than just replacing pumps at gas stations.

I know plenty of people who only have on street parking. With out a guaranteed spot each day.

I can only figure the plan is for a lot less people to own cars. Probably by not being able to afford them.
It takes 3 hours for a full recharge.
 
I would get an electric car if there was infrastructure in my country for them and they were more affordable. No issue with them, it needs to happen.

What I don't get is, how do people with out driveways or garages easily charge them? In my apartment building, the car park isn't full of power outlets. Nothing is set up for people to charge them while parked.

Charging at home, overnight is the biggest thing to make them practical. As opposed to waiting at charging stations. How long is quick charge? Even at 15 minutes, it's a massive backlog than just replacing pumps at gas stations.

I know plenty of people who only have on street parking. With out a guaranteed spot each day.

I can only figure the plan is for a lot less people to own cars. Probably by not being able to afford them.
You'd think that, but realize that the rank and file of the movement aren't aiming to reduce everyones quality of life - They genuinely believe that they can just have everyone owning a Tesla or equivalent just by mandating it and everything will work out. And the elites don't actually have a vested interest in less vehicles, or even much to do with the environment - They have the wealth to be insulated from it, and actively lose from reduced consumerism.

The elites are interested in so far as they can get mass government subsidies for RnD and development while soaking up wokepoints, and the rank and file cannot comprehend that these are objectively worse for the average person in almost every regard.

Remember, The vast majority of environmentalists seem to operate on some weird inability to comprehend multi-level issues. They see a solar panel, don't see it giving off emissions, and conclude its a perfectly clean energy source. They see a nuclear power plant, and see it giving off a few kilograms of highly dangerous but easily controlled waste, and freak the fuck out. They can't fathom the concept of lithium salts or the immense chemical runoffs presented by production of electric vehicles, they just see a Tesla with no exhaust pipe and conclude that is the greenest option. Its consumerist environmentalism, and that lack of understanding means they'll gladly back it all the way to hell.
 
now imagine this, but it's a western state, and the evacuation is in front of a wildfire that threatens LA, Portland, or a city in the East Bay

Believe me, I've thought about what it would look like if LA, Portland, and the Bay Area go up in flames, and their electric cars run out of juice and the bugmen scream impotently, before. Way too much, in fact.
 
I'm not willing to bet on that as 1.2 trillion is as good as 2.5, then 2.5 is as good as 3.5, etc. It's a fucking stupendous amount of money to draw up at once as it is and once that dam has a crack in it you can expect it to only get worse. This was a shitty, awful choice and it will have further consequences rather soon.

I hope I'm wrong but in my gut I know I'm not. These assholes just wrote a check for 1/29 of our total current debt. It's not a small deal nor is it normal.
If it helps, the money is meant to be spent over a decade. So it's a $120bn a year pork drip.

If, for example, the military budget was done a decade at a time, they'd have to pass at least an $8tn spending bill for that.
 
If it helps, the money is meant to be spent over a decade. So it's a $120bn a year pork drip.
It's the principle of it as well as shit like the crypto provision. Think whatever you want of Newt Gingrich but thirteen GOP members openly telling a (as far as I'm aware) senior member of the party to go fuck himself when he threatens to primary anyone who goes against his wishes is pretty bad as well.
 
It's the principle of it as well as shit like the crypto provision. Think whatever you want of Newt Gingrich but thirteen GOP members openly telling a (as far as I'm aware) senior member of the party to go fuck himself when he threatens to primary anyone who goes against his wishes is pretty bad as well.
I'm personally of the opinion that any bill over 20 pages long that addresses more than one thing needs to be split up into parts to be voted on bit by bit. Fuck all this bundle bill bullshit. Line item or fuck off.

Maybe someone can sneak a law like that into a law like this...

edit: as to crypto, yeah, it's bad news for crypto, which means BUY THE DIP!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back