Firstly, he believes that Kyle illegally purchased the gun through his friend Black with the sole intention of going to the riot and putting himself in a situation in which he would be “forced” to shoot people. This, he says, is based off of Kyle’s tweets wherein he talked about shooting shoplifters. I of course put it to him that such a claim was at worst coincidental as I know for a fact that such statements are made constantly through social media and often have no bearing on the reality of what a person would actually do in those scenarios.
It sounds like he got his rifle
before the George Floyd riots:
AR-15-style rifle, Rittenhouse expressed interest in one. During a trip to Black's family's hunting property in May 2020, Black agreed to buy a rifle for Rittenhouse, who was 17 and couldn't lawfully buy or possess one.
Secondly, he claims as many have, that the case should be retried
What does he mean, retried? Does he not believe in double jeopardy?
because the judge is biased towards Kyle and a racist. His reasoning for this believe is, according to him, that the Judge ruled that the defense could call the victims anything but.
The claim is self defense and not referring to the deceased as victims is
standard procedure:
"That's pretty standard in his courtroom to not allow 'victim,'" said Ted Kmiec, a local criminal defense lawyer who has had cases before Schroeder. "He believes you're presumed innocent, and with that presumption of innocence, nobody is a victim unless it's proven."
"But he allowed the term arsonist, rioter, etc."
First, we have multiple testimony that Rosenbaum was an arsonist. Additionally, the mere fact on is a rioter or arson (of non occupied property) does not mean deadly force can be used. Using the argument that they were rioters so deadly force is okay will only lead to a guilty verdict.
Addion
Additionally, he is of the belief that the ring tone used by the Judge is in fact a reason to believe that the Judge is necessarily pro Trump.
A ringtone is just a ringtone. He has to have credible evidence that the ringtone was not selected because the judge is boomer patriot.
The song existed before Trump was President and his run for office. Such it's reasonable to believe that the judge had the ringtone before Trump used it.
Finally, and most annoyingly, he is of the opinion that Kyle is a racist supporter of the Proud Boys, claiming that they even flew a flag celebrating and depicting the number of people he shot. This, he insists, is further evidence that Kyle had every intention of shooting someone during the riot.
So your friend believes that because of Kyle's drinks with the proud boys many weeks AFTER the shooting, it's indicative of his attitude back in time?
Remember that Kyle was ON CUSTODY before the drinks with Proud Boys immediately following his release.
As such, your friend will need to believe Kyle was in clandestine contact with the Proud Boys before the shooting then with very little time set up a meeting after his release from jail.
It's more likely that his boomer mom or impressionable sister got talked into the meeting.
He thereafter refused to take into account the circumstances that led up to that event or the suspicious individual whom had set it up and lured Kyle there to begin with. It is his belief that Kyle wouldn’t have done any of these things if he were really innocent.
So community protection means one wants to shoot someone? What does he think of armed Black groups that focus on community protection?
Legally armed Black citizens have taken up a show of force in the aftermath of Ahmaud Arbery’s shooting.
newsone.com