NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) - Files as crypto currency

The Paranoid Organ said:
"I'm going to sue you for letting people right-click-save a pic that I have a NTF of."
I know you are a newfag (and I am too) but come on dude.


This is actually not a bad idea... Official Kiwifarm Happenings NTFs. I would never buy one but can respect Null for shilling them for Crypto
Click to expand...
Not for downloading, but for profiting off of it ALA ebaumsworld.
 
Terrifik said:
some furries understand the bag & secondary risk of crypto.

make $30-90/per work vs 1 nft worth .1 to ? ETH ( 1 eth set furry for good month rent if the pawn of the ETH)
1eth=$4215.12
View attachment 2723914

the risk is lost time .
secondary risk is how long it will take old joe or yellan to start to ban it
furry will try to side hustle while try to do NFT.
if they get the NFT minted bank for month
furries on twitter have orginzed & main websites (furrifinity & deviant art) have started help with DMCA & alarm systems for stolen art.
minor blind spot is collage.
.................................................
Side note: furry salt
soatok.blog

Furry Porn Against NFTs: A Call to Forearms - Dhole Moments

In A Furry’s Guide to Cryptocurrency, I briefly mentioned that NFTs are a dumb idea and not a valid reason for anyone–but especially furries–to get involved with cryptocurrency. T…
soatok.blog soatok.blog
View attachment 2724007
View attachment 2724000View attachment 2723989
View attachment 2723991
View attachment 2723992
View attachment 2723994
View attachment 2723996
Click to expand...
NFTs appear to be a scam that's a great idea to sell and a horrible idea to buy, but I'd still rather NFTs everywhere than furry porn. Especially gay furry porn.
Vect said:
I've read the OP like 5 times, literally...my brain just can't process to what end this blockchain stuff serves a purpose.

So it's an encrypted token, that 100% verifies one's ownership (but not copyright if you're not the creator) of an asset that likely has no function, of dubious real value and requires no effort to create a perfect duplicate.

So I'd pay money, or value, for a 'right' to ownership that is currently unenforceable? Which makes it slightly less useless than owning the copyright?

I dabble in digital art. I once had an original redesign of Starkiller Base stolen by some Youtuber, but I just thought that's what happens on the Internet - nobody can really own anything. And these artists are surprised that their work gets copied?

Whats more, if it's an original piece of digital art, but you change the colour of a single pixel, does that then change it to a new piece of original art?

Have I missed something?
Click to expand...
There are laws on the books related to digital art, due to the digital millennium copyright act. Changes to your art need to be considered 'transformative' to count as 'new', that's generally considered to be making it significantly different to a degree where you cannot and would not interact with it as a substitute for the original product. Depending on who owns the original product and where you're putting it, you're probably better off just not touching an original piece of digital media without permission. Places like Youtube and Twitch will yank even truly transformative work frequently just because someone puts in a claim saying 'hey I own that!' and if you're trying to use property owned by big companies like Sony or Disney, it doesn't matter if you satisfy the legal definition of fair use, they'll drag you through the courts until you run out of money and have to give up and cave in to their demands as if you were in the wrong anyway.

I do not believe any of that applies to NFTs, but that's just answering your question about digital art itself. As for your Starkiller base design, if it was recognizably a Starkiller base, included recognizable Star Wars trademarks, or you announced it was a Starkiller base, you never owned the copyright to the image in the first place anyway, so it's impossible for someone to steal the image or design from you. (DMCA is extremely overly permissive to the so-called copyright holders)
centaursTesticle [CT] said:
Full offense, stonetoss is laughably dumb and equally as annoying and I don't care what happens to him as long as it's something bad or hilarious. I'm not surprised he's hopping on NFTs, he does this like every other month with whatever is controversial at the moment because his whole persona is built on getting attention or figuring out which group he should tell to kill themselves this week to piss the most people off. Did he do something relevant recently that would make his NFT escapades important or something? Because last I checked he was profiting off the amogus meme and mass producing whiney comics about how black people and trannies are singlehandedly taking over the world.
Click to expand...
Stonetoss may be dumb and his fans dumber, but he makes bank regularly and makes the people who hate him seethe. I cannot really fault him for this.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Synthwave Obsessed, centaursTesticle [CT] and Least Concern
Seems like Discord has been wanting to get on in that NFT train.

Look at the not-rigged, fair survey there. And the comments are just laughable, reeing at discord telling that they'll leave and cancel nitro which is very less likely to happen. But I can say they are right that once everyone stops paying for Nitro it can possibly hurt discord since there are a lot of alternatives unlike YouTube which is also complicated to set up.

Not that Discord deserves cash anyways thanks to their horrible UI and missing necessary features.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Synthwave Obsessed and Secret Messages
Staffy said:
Seems like Discord has been wanting to get on in that NFT train.

Look at the not-rigged, fair survey there. And the comments are just laughable, reeing at discord telling that they'll leave and cancel nitro which is very less likely to happen. But I can say they are right that once everyone stops paying for Nitro it can possibly hurt discord since there are a lot of alternatives unlike YouTube which is also complicated to set up.

Not that Discord deserves cash anyways thanks to their horrible UI and missing necessary features.
Click to expand...
I saw that survey a few weeks ago. The impression I got was that it was more about seeing what Discord users were interested in for marketing purposes rather than laying the groundwork to do their own stuff with NFTs, but I guess we'll see. Not really sure what Discord themselves could do with the tech.

The link to r/antiwork (which is a Reddit promoting the amazing idea that the government should just give everybody money and so that way nobody would ever have to work) is amazing though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Secret Messages
Least Concern said:
The link to r/antiwork (which is a Reddit promoting the amazing idea that the government should just give everybody money and so that way nobody would ever have to work) is amazing though.
Click to expand...
LMAO I didn't even notice that until now, that thread is hilarious, it's also suddenly linked too so the OP also has his own agenda
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Secret Messages
Staffy said:
Seems like Discord has been wanting to get on in that NFT train.

Look at the not-rigged, fair survey there. And the comments are just laughable, reeing at discord telling that they'll leave and cancel nitro which is very less likely to happen. But I can say they are right that once everyone stops paying for Nitro it can possibly hurt discord since there are a lot of alternatives unlike YouTube which is also complicated to set up.

Not that Discord deserves cash anyways thanks to their horrible UI and missing necessary features.
Click to expand...
aaa.png
will nocoiners ever stop seething?
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Synthwave Obsessed, Staffy and Least Concern
Anybody here watch the Macy's Thanksgving Day Parade?

1637917686157.png


My jaw dropped when they announced it. This shit is being pushed at all angles, everywhere, I don't know how more people don't see there's something fucking fishy going on. Most people just learned what NTFs were six months ago, and even then most don't really understand them. Suddenly they're getting implemented on every fucking corner of the internet, then they're featured in one of the most normie events of the year. I don't blame people for throwing massive bitch fits over NFTs because, regardless of their rationale, something very powerful and scary is behind them. There's no way this is an organic movement.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: c-no, theshitposter, Lapis Lazuli and 9 others
PoisonedBun said:
Anybody here watch the Macy's Thanksgving Day Parade?

View attachment 2752320

My jaw dropped when they announced it. This shit is being pushed at all angles, everywhere, I don't know how more people don't see there's something fucking fishy going on. Most people just learned what NTFs were six months ago, and even then most don't really understand them. Suddenly they're getting implemented on every fucking corner of the internet, then they're featured in one of the most normie events of the year. I don't blame people for throwing massive bitch fits over NFTs because, regardless of their rationale, something very powerful and scary is behind them. There's no way this is an organic movement.
Click to expand...
No, it's not and you would be correct to assume something weird is going on. The millennials watched their parents get fucked over by the housing crash and responded to that by trying to make something that can't be controlled by governments and billionaires. Can you tell me what has happened in recent years? As much as I hate Elon Musk, he should have made it really obvious that the ruling class was up to something. Instead, a bunch of idiots that want his dick were lining up to hold the bag for whatever memecoin he was shilling. If he lost money or not isn't the point. The point is that crypto is compromised and this puts a nail in the coffin for one of the so-called "benefits" of crypto. If anyone can get into it, someone who is real-life pay-to-win can destroy the market there, too. Not only has crypto been the nerd's stock market, but it has been a great way for sick fucks to get their fix from black markets.

Normies don't care about NFTs. None of my real life friends know what a NFT is. They barely know what Bitcoin is and that was whatever they learned from big news media. But the people that own the news media do know and they do care since they see another way to frack money out of people. As much as I hate the idea of a further exchange towards the top, idiots need to realize that crypto was rigged from the start. A lot of people who thought they were not the bag holders are about to become bag holders.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Chimerical, PoisonedBun and I am vomit
1638140803913.png

www.cnbc.com

AMC, Sony offering NFTs to people who purchase advance Spider-Man tickets

The theater giant and Sony Pictures will offer 86,000 non-fungible tokens.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com
1638140836950.png

AMC is the latest legacy company to get into the NFT game.

The theater giant and Sony Pictures will offer 86,000 non-fungible tokens to members of its AMC Stubs Premiere, AMC Stubs A-List and AMC Investor Connect who order tickets for the Dec. 16 opening of “Spider-Man: No Way Home” in advance.

Brands big and small are looking for new ways to connect with consumers and, potentially, boost some sales. With crypto-collectibles soaring in popularity, marketers have latched on to the next digital wave.


Ownership of these assets is recorded on a blockchain — a digital ledger similar to the networks that underpin bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Unlike most traditional currencies, however, a person can’t exchange one NFT for another as they would with dollars or other assets. Each NFT is unique and acts as a collector’s item that can’t be duplicated, making them rare by design.

AMC said Sunday that more than 100 NFT designs will be available, in partnership with Cub Studios.

Tickets for the film go on sale Nov. 29. Customers who qualify for the NFT will receive an email with redemption instructions on Dec. 22, and the token must be redeemed by March 1.
Click to expand...
1638140887452.png

everyone doing before bubble burst or the crypto taxes come
 
  • Winner
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: theshitposter, Pissmaster, Synthwave Obsessed and 3 others
centaursTesticle [CT] said:
Full offense, stonetoss is laughably dumb and equally as annoying and I don't care what happens to him as long as it's something bad or hilarious. I'm not surprised he's hopping on NFTs, he does this like every other month with whatever is controversial at the moment because his whole persona is built on getting attention or figuring out which group he should tell to kill themselves this week to piss the most people off. Did he do something relevant recently that would make his NFT escapades important or something? Because last I checked he was profiting off the amogus meme and mass producing whiney comics about how black people and trannies are singlehandedly taking over the world.
Click to expand...
I would agree if it wasn't for the fact that the left despises him. Seriously, visit /r/AntifaStonetoss and marvel at how much they seethe over him. I also know of at least three "leftist" knockoffs that try (and fail) to capture the same energy. If we're going by mainstream reach, appeal, and success nobody else on the Internet right compares to Stonetoss right now. Say what you will but he's clearly doing something right.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: I am vomit and Lapis Lazuli
  • Informative
Reactions: AMHOLIO, MovieSlob, Full Race Replay and 5 others
Question about NFTs.
So it's a crypto coin tied to art files. okay. Dumb as hell, but ok.

So....why can't the art be good? Why does it always have to suck so much? I've seen better deviantart abominations, so why do these NFT artworks look like that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Full Race Replay
FluffyTet said:
Question about NFTs.
So it's a crypto coin tied to art files. okay. Dumb as hell, but ok.

So....why can't the art be good? Why does it always have to suck so much? I've seen better deviantart abominations, so why do these NFT artworks look like that?
Click to expand...
Probably because that's what appeals to the people buying them right now.

Those monkeys and lions and shit are quirky enough to be interesting and safe enough to be marketable. They're not paying so they can own "good art" they're just paying for the token + to be a part of whichever autistic micro community they're buying from. And as the latter grows in popularity, so does the number of people who want in.

There's plenty of "good" NFT art, but as with any medium sometimes the worst of it is just what gets popular.
 
FluffyTet said:
Question about NFTs.
So it's a crypto coin tied to art files. okay. Dumb as hell, but ok.

So....why can't the art be good? Why does it always have to suck so much? I've seen better deviantart abominations, so why do these NFT artworks look like that?
Click to expand...
That's because you're looking a bunch of assets meant to be mass produced. There's a bunch of NFTs that are of higher quality that come from just artists like Tim Bougami
 
  • Like
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, ditto and Full Race Replay
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back