Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

[THEY STOLE MY FORESKIN]

I haven't been able to keep up with the thread completely but I was wondering something and I would really appreciate if someone could give some insight.

When the attack happened there were a few users like @NEETzsche saying that something needs to be done, the local population should do an uprising of sorts to demand change. Afterwards some other users called him a glowie. That's something that I've seen happen a lot the past two years and it got me thinking why it is that the glowie "meme" became this popular all of a sudden. I was talking with another user that I absolutely agree that some things have to change in the US (but I don't say anything because I don't live there and it would be extremely snobbish to think I could comment on their problems) and that uprisings should happen, but I don't exactly understand why it's automatically assumed that the person meant a violent one.

In my country when we talk about uprisings and protests we think of, for example, strikes and picket lines. Imagine, for instance, that in the whole state of Wisconsin the population organizes a strike of truck drivers and cheesemakers for, say, a year, to protest against the injustice that just happened. Or if you want something less dramatic, imagine a picket line in front of the Courthouse to protest against the Kenosha DA and ADA that lasts a month. How come this is practically never cogitated when talking about uprisings and protests? Of course that's not going to bring back those lost in this attack and when comparing the two (strike/picket line and terrorist attack in a Christmas parade) it would seem like a fly on an elephants back, but it's not necessary to think of "peaceful protests" in the same way as Antifa/CNN does, whitey could have their own way of protesting that they can't tamper with.

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I'm genuinely curious and, again, I would appreciate if someone could give me some insight.

 

[JambledUpWords]

When the attack happened there were a few users like @NEETzsche saying that something needs to be done, the local population should do an uprising of sorts to demand change. Afterwards some other users called him a glowie.

The reason people were calling him a glowie isn’t because of some meme, but because he was advocating for other people to carry out violence for him. He was dumb to do so and deserved to get banned. You can take action without being retarded, but NEETzsche clearly couldn’t.

 

[THEY STOLE MY FORESKIN]

The reason people were calling him a glowie isn’t because of some meme, but because he was advocating for other people to carry out violence for him. He was dumb to do so and deserved to get banned. You can take action without being retarded, but NEETzsche clearly couldn’t.

Oh, I didn't know he was banned. But yeah I used him as an example because it was the first one that came to my mind and he was posting in this thread, I didn't remember that he said others should be violent, what stuck with me is him being very upset (I mean, of course, everyone was) and saying that something should be done or whatever, and then others saying he was fedposting and glowing. I've seen some other users saying similar stuff here on Kiwifarms (without inciting others like NEETzsche did) but still getting called a glowie and ignored. I'm a little perplexed with this, honestly.

Edit: to clarify, obviously I'm not saying this is exclusive to Kiwifarms, but rather most other sites as well.

 

[MrJokerRager]

I'll bite.

Abolition and freedom of slavery were won by a man who also considered them completely inferior to the white man and had vocalized no desire to push them any closer to equality, lol - as for the latter, are you calling it a 'conservative' achievement because it was pioneered by early Republicans, who were the fucking liberals of their time? NAWSA and other organizations for suffrage in the earlier era were racist as shit and the majority of their support came from Republican pioneers and early Republican civil rights activists, who were very much the liberals of their time - the Conservatives of their time were located in the Solid South/Democratic Party and had their own suffragette organizations, equally as racist as the northern suffragette organizations like NAWSA (NAWSA was so segregated blacks had to create completely separate identities for female suffrage) and were very much opposed to suffrage, my guy.

Nationalism was actually pretty common in classical liberal movements not just in the States but in Europe, too, considering most of the classical revolutions of 1848 are attributable to nationalistic movements.

When considering 'conservatism' and 'liberalism' in terms of achievement on a chronological basis, it's probably best to remember that conservatism of any given period of time exists to conserve what was once the liberalism of the preceding sociological era in Human development(aside from weird shit like paleoconservatism which just take an antiquated set of traditional views and try to keep them ideologically 'frozen in time') and this occurs as social and industrial development & progress eclipse the 'conservative' attitudes of the time, forcing the overton window a bit further - what is ideologically conservative and liberal for a given time period depends on what is ideologically traditional and progressive for a given time period.

Civil rights in terms of colored integration - folks like Harry F. Byrd who founded the Massive Resistance movement opposed to public desegregation in schools (and eventually desegregation throughout the rest of society), are you really willing to call them a liberal? Most people considered them to be very conservative for the time, lol. They're essentially the foundational, doctrinal basis for the most 'right' of paleocons today.

Only basis you have for attributing any of these achievements to 'conservatives' is the fact they are attributed to Republicans, the liberals of the era - to boot, many Republicans of the time also backed things that modern Republicans wouldn't necessarily back: In 1976, Republicans considered themselves 26.1% liberal, 47.7% moderate and 70.1% conservative on most political matters and if you go further back than 1976 into say, 1933, the percentage of Republicans that considered themselves 'liberal' starts to hover around 40% or more; the Republican shift towards the right coincided with the Southern Strategy and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Roe v. Wade only cementing the shift right.

Semantics are semantics, but one can't just ignore the fact that the parties had a massive ideological shift after the civil rights era and there's a much longer story to all of this but I'm not getting into that shit: the entire history of conservatism consists of giving ground to their day's progressives and eventually becoming their day's progressives.

I still believe the Southern Strategy is a meme and cope by Democrats.

Nixon only won the South in a year he had a landslide against some leftist cuck from Minnesota iirc. Carter won the Deep South in 1976 and Reagan carried the entire nation.

First time Republicans finally conquered the South was in the 2000 election. And now it's post 2016 that we finally see Republicans start controlling the South at state and local levels more strongly than ever before. Florida for the first time has Republicans more than Democrats.

 

[Milwaukee Macho Man]

Oh, I didn't know he was banned. But yeah I used him as an example because it was the first one that came to my mind and he was posting in this thread, I didn't remember that he said others should be violent, what stuck with me is him being very upset (I mean, of course, everyone was) and saying that something should be done or whatever, and then others saying he was fedposting and glowing. I've seen some other users saying similar stuff here on Kiwifarms (without inciting others like NEETzsche did) but still getting called a glowie and ignored. I'm a little perplexed with this, honestly.

Edit: to clarify, obviously I'm not saying this is exclusive to Kiwifarms, but rather most other sites as well.

This is just me talking, so take it however you want.

It's all but been confirmed that the feds instigated January 6th, and they've been caught trying to set up protests and gatherings to get people they deem undesirable. We've even gotten pretty good signs pointing to them trying to run interference when caught doing this on 4Chan and other sites.

So yeah, glowie can get thrown around a lot. But when someone gets on here and starts promoting wholesale violence against entire groups of people without a hint of humor or using the patented "in minecraft", they have a join date within the past 6 months and we don't hear about the feds contacting Null or anything like they did with Sig I tend to believe it's justified to start calling them a fucking glowie and telling them to fuck off.

 

[elite_club]

I haven't been able to keep up with the thread completely but I was wondering something and I would really appreciate if someone could give some insight.

When the attack happened there were a few users like @NEETzsche saying that something needs to be done, the local population should do an uprising of sorts to demand change. Afterwards some other users called him a glowie. That's something that I've seen happen a lot the past two years and it got me thinking why it is that the glowie "meme" became this popular all of a sudden. I was talking with another user that I absolutely agree that some things have to change in the US (but I don't say anything because I don't live there and it would be extremely snobbish to think I could comment on their problems) and that uprisings should happen, but I don't exactly understand why it's automatically assumed that the person meant a violent one.

In my country when we talk about uprisings and protests we think of, for example, strikes and picket lines. Imagine, for instance, that in the whole state of Wisconsin the population organizes a strike of truck drivers and cheesemakers for, say, a year, to protest against the injustice that just happened. Or if you want something less dramatic, imagine a picket line in front of the Courthouse to protest against the Kenosha DA and ADA that lasts a month. How come this is practically never cogitated when talking about uprisings and protests? Of course that's not going to bring back those lost in this attack and when comparing the two (strike/picket line and terrorist attack in a Christmas parade) it would seem like a fly on an elephants back, but it's not necessary to think of "peaceful protests" in the same way as Antifa/CNN does, whitey could have their own way of protesting that they can't tamper with.

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I'm genuinely curious and, again, I would appreciate if someone could give me some insight.

It’s not a new meme to be paranoid about informants baiting you to do crimes

 

[THEY STOLE MY FORESKIN]

It’s not a new meme to be paranoid about informants baiting you to do crimes

I know this is a newfag thing to ask, but do you think this paranoia has grown lately? Personally I noticed it became really popular once the pandemic started and specially after Terry Davis died, him coining the term glownigger and all.

 

[Helvítis Túristi]

I think this needs to be said even if it's obvious, but the media narrative would've been different if the police firing shots connected with the terrorist and killed him. They would have sided with Brooks no matter what, victims be damned. We'd also see the feds and neoliberal faggots not give up so easily to control the narrative of the thread either. They would have sucked off that pedo nigger terrorist's corpse all the way past the conviction of the police officers who would have shot him. Starting to get predictable when they only show so much interest when a nigger dies, not when they're taken in alive.

 

[MysticLord]

I'll answer that when you can tell me what the ironically named "conservatives" have done in the past 100 years. I'm going to take a very well-educated guess at this and say you're here because you got banned off of all normie social media. I'm also going to take a very well-educated guess and say that your views were perfectly acceptable in most places just a few years ago. From where I'm standing, it doesn't seem like your political leanings have managed to move the ball forward much.

Good thing I'm not a conservative then, and neither are the vast majority of normal people.

Most people, when they describe their beliefs, are populists with a sprinkling of libertarian and nationalist. Conservatism is and always has been a fake movement designed to quell popular sentiments in favor of elites.

They saved us from Hilldog for four solid years. That alone is gold. They were the ones who broke Tangerine Man into the mainstream.

If you think that the Alt Right got Trump elected, you are delusional. Normies who were tired of unlimited immigration got Trump elected, and that's it.

 

[Collections Agent]

I think this needs to be said even if it's obvious, but the media narrative would've been different if the police firing shots connected with the terrorist and killed him. They would have sided with Brooks no matter what, victims be damned. We'd also see the feds and neoliberal faggots not give up so easily to control the narrative of the thread either. They would have sucked off that pedo nigger terrorist's corpse all the way past the conviction of the police officers who would have shot him. Starting to get predictable when they only show so much interest when a nigger dies, not when they're taken in alive.

HEADLINE: UNARMED BLACK DRIVER SHOT IN THE BACK BY WHITE POLICE WHILE ENJOYING LOCAL PARADE
also 60 injured and 6 dead lol

 

[potato in mah painus]

I know this is a newfag thing to ask, but do you think this paranoia has grown lately? Personally I noticed it became really popular once the pandemic started and specially after Terry Davis died, him coining the term glownigger and all.

Recent small protest at DC where only a handful of people showed up, these guys showed up at another a few weeks ago posing as white supremacists (lol). There is also FBI involvement that was showcased during the Rittenhouse trial heavily implying they had people in the crowds as well.
Not paranoia when the fuckers are getting caught doing this shit.

 

[Collections Agent]

I know this is a newfag thing to ask, but do you think this paranoia has grown lately? Personally I noticed it became really popular once the pandemic started and specially after Terry Davis died, him coining the term glownigger and all.

It's not paranoia as much as the lettered agencies have been shit at opsec lately and keep getting caught setting up people to be arrested at right-leaning rallies

 

[mr.moon1488]

Recent small protest at DC where only a handful of people showed up, these guys showed up at another a few weeks ago posing as white supremacists (lol). There is also FBI involvement that was showcased during the Rittenhouse trial heavily implying they had people in the crowds as well.
Not paranoia when the fuckers are getting caught doing this shit.

It's not paranoia to be worried about them, I'm sure there's at least one morbidly obese glowie watching this thread right now, but there is some paranoia deliberately being pushed in order to cause inaction.

Basically, I'd say this:
It's not paranoia if someone really is out to get you, but it's still paranoia if you think everything is out to get you.

 

[WonderWino]

View attachment 2752294

Well, folks. It looks like we've got a killer car on the loose.

"Caused by an SUV". Jesus. Now I've heard everything.

You think its bad now just wait until thomas the tank engine finally snaps and jumps the track in NYC hauling a load of napalm and nitroglycerine during a christmas parade

 

[Just Another Apocalypse]

Good thing I'm not a conservative then, and neither are the vast majority of normal people

Conservatives Greatly Outnumber Liberals in 19 U.S. States

Six U.S. states had more residents identifying as liberal than as conservative in 2018. Nineteen states were "highly conservative."

news.gallup.com

"The residents of most U.S. states are more likely to identify as conservative than as liberal in their political ideology. In 25 states, the conservative advantage is significantly greater than the national average, including 19 "highly conservative" states in which conservatives outnumber liberals by at least 20 percentage points"

I doubt things have changed much in two years. Speak for yourself... Not the "vast" majority.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

You think its bad now just wait until thomas the tank engine finally snaps and jumps the track in NYC hauling a load of napalm and nitroglycerine during a christmas parade

Thanksgiving Day Parade was boring, as usual but that would certainly make it more exciting.

 

[MG-34]

If we get actual high speed trains in this country then this is acceptable.

You've never shared a train with feral niggers before.

 

[ShoFuKan]

Let's get the articles out of the way:

Milwaukee district attorney shines spotlight on liberal prosecutors

archived 27 Nov 2021 01:00:12 UTC

archive.md

Washington Post is blasted for claiming that Waukesha tragedy that ki…

archived 27 Nov 2021 01:00:54 UTC

archive.md

There's a few here on the community:

I live near Waukesha – here’s how it can recover from the deadly atta…

archived 27 Nov 2021 00:59:48 UTC

archive.md

Teen recovering after saving his siblings during Waukesha Christmas p…

archived 27 Nov 2021 00:45:40 UTC

archive.md

CNN showing that ramp that was being built finished in a day.

Waukesha parade victims who need wheelchairs are getting ramps thanks…

archived 27 Nov 2021 01:00:01 UTC

archive.md

Waukesha Strong: Help arrived in the moment, and in subsequent days

archived 27 Nov 2021 01:00:50 UTC

archive.md

Update from the children's hospital, no more kids in critical condition:

Spoiler: Community Tweets

Various local things happening in the community:

One of the nurses in hospital treated this patient.

From the memorial, all the crosses and the marker has faded but still legible.

Burying the story:

Teen who saved his family, he was tracked down from the video:

JJ Watt on the tragedy:

Christmas Parade's increasing security:

This kid went under the SUV.

 

[Drunk and Pour]

View attachment 2752294

Well, folks. It looks like we've got a killer car on the loose.

"Caused by an SUV". Jesus. Now I've heard everything.

It's been happening for decades. We never learn

Seriously, fuck the Washington Post.

 

[Ishtar]

I haven't been able to keep up with the thread completely but I was wondering something and I would really appreciate if someone could give some insight.

When the attack happened there were a few users like @NEETzsche saying that something needs to be done, the local population should do an uprising of sorts to demand change. Afterwards some other users called him a glowie. That's something that I've seen happen a lot the past two years and it got me thinking why it is that the glowie "meme" became this popular all of a sudden. I was talking with another user that I absolutely agree that some things have to change in the US (but I don't say anything because I don't live there and it would be extremely snobbish to think I could comment on their problems) and that uprisings should happen, but I don't exactly understand why it's automatically assumed that the person meant a violent one.

In my country when we talk about uprisings and protests we think of, for example, strikes and picket lines. Imagine, for instance, that in the whole state of Wisconsin the population organizes a strike of truck drivers and cheesemakers for, say, a year, to protest against the injustice that just happened. Or if you want something less dramatic, imagine a picket line in front of the Courthouse to protest against the Kenosha DA and ADA that lasts a month. How come this is practically never cogitated when talking about uprisings and protests? Of course that's not going to bring back those lost in this attack and when comparing the two (strike/picket line and terrorist attack in a Christmas parade) it would seem like a fly on an elephants back, but it's not necessary to think of "peaceful protests" in the same way as Antifa/CNN does, whitey could have their own way of protesting that they can't tamper with.

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I'm genuinely curious and, again, I would appreciate if someone could give me some insight.

I genuinely think the "glowie" meme has in large part been spread to do this very thing. Inculcate a sense of hopelessness and do nothing talk. Because its clear you need real action, on the street and in the government, else nothing will change. '