DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell: General Discussion #2

[TheGoutburglar]

Like how far would he go down the list before it clicked that he has a history of saying this kind of stuff?

Phil already knows who and what he is because he's the one who gets worse off-camera and bitches the hardest when someone brings up something he knows is accurate. What it would click with is anyone else, who isn't a glue-sniffing imbecile, which is exactly what Phil is trying to escape to: normies who don't know that he's a piece of shit.

His pattern is very clear, and a big part of why I no longer think Linda fostered his sociopathic narcissism. She may not be bright, or have done all the right things, but she's just as much a mark as someone like Kevin Bernstein or whatever. She does not know what her son is, any more than Leanna or John Rambo and Howard did until they figured it out. She didn't create him so much as fail to spot him as an impending disaster of a human being destined to victimize others because his vices are more important than his health, his relationships, and the well-being of anyone else, including those who make the mistake of giving him things.

And it's also why I'm glad he gets put on blast by an entire community of dedicated detractors, because it means way fewer marks for this selfish scheming shitbag to find.

 

[Jose Cuervo]

There's something hilarious about him literally saying he agrees with himself

Spoiler

 

[GreySydeDave]

"That was the old DSP you idiot. I've changed and am a much better person now you fucking retard!"

"It was muh depression."

 

[Broomer]

I don't really understand why the fuck he thinks this is ultimately a detrimental decision by YouTube

In the twisted mind of piggy he sees it as; "If you have to manually select that you aren't sponsored most people ARE sponsored", that's why it's a sad day as most videos shouldn't be sponsored. (which they of course aren't but piggy logic has an astounding lack of actual logic, knowledge and anything making it worthwhile outside of the ability to create laughter and threads on the farm)

I'm guessing YT made it this way so people can't "accidently forget" to click that the video is sponsored and a non-sponsored video marked as sponsored isn't a crime, so...

That's at least my take on the Tweet and why they've got sponsored on by default. (fuck, I'm going to have to do a ton of editing henceforth, this new KBD is way too sensitive, it'd feel right at home at Twitch...)

 

[50 bit bitch]

But what is stopping him from playing it with the horse behind da scenes™ and uploading it?

Kat's enormous weight gain after a steady diet of mashed potatoes and benzos

 

[Mask_de_SMITH]

Halo infinite premiere Midstream status:

Total tip: $238

Top tip: Robert Wayne ($100)

As expected, day 1 view and dumbfucks dumping money to the pig, led by the household name that we all know so well, long time fan, silent majority leader Robert Wayne

The pig had a near 2 hour prestream and took a 25 minute break, but he is, of course, busting his ass, and therefore

"I noticed once the big tip came in and the tip goal is met then the stream contribution just froze, right? If you like this stream, you can still contribute, just saying, nuhhuh"

View attachment 2784572

195,000 subscribers, and only 324 people watching?

Where are the rest of those numbers? And how many of them are (more than likely) dead accounts?

 

[Serf 'n' TERF]

195,000 subscribers, and only 324 people watching?

Where are the rest of those numbers? And how many of them are (more than likely) dead accounts?

~195,000 subscribers.
~300 viewers per stream.
~20 people in chat.
~10 comments on videos with 1000+ views.

Bugged engagement metrics, dood!

Edit: Has anyone actually looked at Phil's sub numbers on Social Blade?

Spoiler

Compare this to a few other channels:

It doesn't really matter who or what the other channels are (nor how much bigger or smaller than DSP they are). What matters is the very clear difference between natural growth and decline versus very obvious sub botting. Phil has spikes of +1000 subscribers every 1-2 months with nothing else inbetween.

And Social Blade does count growth that is less than 1000, and also does not only use increments of 1000. For example, it will show a growth of 100:

And will also show 1,300:

So why is it that Phil either shows 0, +1000 or -1000?

I wonder if anything in the bank leaks shows data that would correspond with this. Or perhaps it's a bi-monthly gift from a particularly well-known retard in the DSPverse.

 

[TheGoutburglar]

Kat's enormous weight gain after a steady diet of mashed potatoes and benzos

I'll always wonder about that, because we're surely never going to find out the truth, any more than we stand a chance of finding out the full story on why the loss of Leanna fucked Phil up worse than anything I've ever seen.

195,000 subscribers, and only 324 people watching?

Where are the rest of those numbers? And how many of them are (more than likely) dead accounts?

What's funny is, Phil is wondering the same thing, as if the answer isn't obvious. lol

 

[Pandalee’s Tits]

Nice caption Phillip:
View attachment 2788364

(From twitter)

I’m fucking dying lmaooooo

 

[ThatLurker]

Oh, I missed the 10k mark. Well, here's to another 10k.

 

[King of Not Playing Games]

~195,000 subscribers.
~300 viewers per stream.
~20 people in chat.
~10 comments on videos with 1000+ views.

Bugged engagement metrics, dood!

Edit: Has anyone actually looked at Phil's sub numbers on Social Blade?

Spoiler

View attachment 2789094
View attachment 2789097
View attachment 2789099
View attachment 2789100
View attachment 2789102
View attachment 2789103
View attachment 2789104
View attachment 2789105
View attachment 2789107
View attachment 2789135

Compare this to a few other channels:

View attachment 2789115
View attachment 2789118
View attachment 2789119

It doesn't really matter who or what the other channels are (nor how much bigger or smaller than DSP they are). What matters is the very clear difference between natural growth and decline versus very obvious sub botting. Phil has spikes of +1000 subscribers every 1-2 months with nothing else inbetween.

And Social Blade does count growth that is less than 1000, and also does not only use increments of 1000. For example, it will show a growth of 100:
View attachment 2789148
And will also show 1,300:
View attachment 2789150

So why is it that Phil either shows 0, +1000 or -1000?
View attachment 2789153

I wonder if anything in the bank leaks shows data that would correspond with this. Or perhaps it's a bi-monthly gift from a particularly well-known retard in the DSPverse.

Wow, that’s incredibly blatant. Was he buying followers like that when he was on Twitch? Just more scummy behavior from DSP and his pay pigs.

 

[PieceofShet]

ohoh

 

[LostMy1stAccount]

Wow, that’s incredibly blatant. Was he buying followers like that when he was on Twitch? Just more scummy behavior from DSP and his pay pigs.

Probably some PayPig who wants to stroke his daddy's ego.

 

[Prophet Gaming]

Well we know that the Christmas Marathon was met by sock accounts and not actual organic growth. Then you have Phil complaining about other channels with BOT or SOCK accounts driving up SUBs/Memberships. But its ok if its done on his channel. Pignosis in effect.

Remember, whenever we create content on Phil its slander and Harrassment, but when Phil does it ( every pre-stream-podcast ) its not.

 

[MAWBD]

ohoh

View attachment 2789203

View attachment 2789205

Incoming Twich apology any minute now.

 

[Serf 'n' TERF]

Wow, that’s incredibly blatant. Was he buying followers like that when he was on Twitch? Just more scummy behavior from DSP and his pay pigs.

It doesn't seem so:

Spoiler

The graph here starts at May 2014 and ends at November 2021. There's nothing there which visually suggests botting (to me).
But then compared to his overview of YouTube (which is a much lesser timeline for some reason):

I've briefly looked over the debits spreadsheet and there are PayPal transactions shortly before the dates of the spikes, but the amounts vary greatly and it's not enough to suggest strongly that this is what they were paying for.

I also don't know how sub botting works when it comes to paying for them. It seems that they increase your sub count gradually over a few days, does that mean that they also take staggered payments?

Who knows, but it's pretty clear that one way or another, DSP is being pumped with botted subs. This is something that many people here likely already knew, but it's nice to have visual evidence.

 

[Iron Hamster]

ohoh

View attachment 2789203

View attachment 2789205

lol. And twitch looks right past his faggotry to reply to this guy:

 

[King Daddy Telomerase]

Youtube subs are strange. On my channel, I'll randomly gain and lose a bunch of subs at times for no explainable reason. Youtube also will unsubscribe people from your channel without your knowledge.

I doubt Phil has bought subs. The vast majority of his 200k subs are dead accounts from a decade ago when Phil was relevant. If Phil was going to buy anything, it would be views to try competing with the trolls that kill him in the algorithm. Which he obviously doesn't because his views are historically terrible for a former Top 10 Youtuber.

 

[Iron Hamster]

Youtube subs are strange. On my channel, I'll randomly gain and lose a bunch of subs at times for no explainable reason. Youtube also will unsubscribe people from your channel without your knowledge.

I doubt Phil has bought subs. The vast majority of his 200k subs are dead accounts from a decade ago when Phil was relevant. If Phil was going to buy anything, it would be views to try competing with the trolls that kill him in the algorithm. Which he obviously doesn't because his views are historically terrible for a former Top 10 Youtuber.

He's not Mr. Views. DEBUNKED!

 

[Serf 'n' TERF]

Youtube subs are strange. On my channel, I'll randomly gain and lose a bunch of subs at times for no explainable reason. Youtube also will unsubscribe people from your channel without your knowledge.

I doubt Phil has bought subs. The vast majority of his 200k subs are dead accounts from a decade ago when Phil was relevant. If Phil was going to buy anything, it would be views to try competing with the trolls that kill him in the algorithm. Which he obviously doesn't because his views are historically terrible for a former Top 10 Youtuber.

Okay, I appreciate your input as someone who has a YouTube channel and can view their metrics. It is practical and experienced input.

But does your sub count increase by the exact same amount, at roughly the exact same time every 1-2 months?
And does it then decline by the exact same amount shortly after?

You're right, YouTube does purge channels of subscribers often, and it does this with accounts that it identifies (I do not know how exactly) as accounts that are either compromised, botted or have violated YouTube's TOS. There's a myriad of reasons that channels lose subs and you are correct in saying that it's normal.

What isn't normal, however, is to have a consistent +1000/-1000 with no variables inbetween.

Edit: Also, I'm not suggesting that all 195,000 of his subs are botted. But over this past year at the very least, it is clear that someone has been boosting the sub count beyond a natural growth.