Does it even matter where he lives? He spends 95% of his life inside his house in his South African-tier (in his mind) gated community. The best thing he could do is move to somewhere with low tax and ensure it had a good AC system. Of course, he won't do that because he's irrationally afraid of stepping out of his gated community unless absolutely necessary (all reasons being food/alcohol-centric).
He's got what? 4-5 years max left before his channel becomes dead, he has zero put away, and, correct me if I'm wrong, but the bank owns a large portion of the WAkhando. I think the most likely scenario is that this super successful individual will be living with his parents by his mid-40s. I guess at this point he's just banking on his inheritance seeing him through for the rest of his life but given his spending habits it'll only last him a couple of years.
What I always find the most interesting with DSP is how little he's planned for the future. Anyone can see that content creation is a young man's game so you'd think he'd have actually done some contingency planning and worked out what to do when people started ditching his channel. As I see them the options were: 1. Manage your money from an early stage and make sure you've got enough money to cover your back, given that Phil has no kids to spend money on or leave assets too this isn't really a large amount of money (assuming he didn't get addicted to mobile games in the first place). 2. Find a way to carry on his career once his content becomes stale, e.g. some kind of video game journalism or commentary (even if he just gets supported to tweet via patreon). 3. Adapt his content to his ageing audience or become one of those comfy gaming channels that a lot of people like to watch, for example that old woman who plays skyrim that people love. Instead of those he chose option 4. Be an ungrateful, entitled prick and live paypig to paypig.
I worked in a lab for a couple of years recently and the supervisor viewed all the issues as being a result of his staff's laziness and unwillingness to commit to the cause, when in reality his refusal to drive the research forward, engage, or even speak with us was the major issue and causing the morale to be rock-bottom. I remember talking with someone and saying that his ship is sinking due to his own incompetence and he's blaming anything he can without considering pointing the finger at himself. I've always seen Phil as the same, the reason I don't really mind how slow Phil's ship is sinking is because it keeps his hopes up that he's somehow going to get an out, and the longer he experiences that feeling the harder the crash is going to be. It's going to be glorious when the house of cards collapses and the gin tweets it produces are going to be incredible.