YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

I'm sure they'll have some lies episode where they declare that they've been spewing nonsense to further a narrative, but it seems good so far.
It always boggles my mind their lies videos are longer than the actual episodes in their series.
Winston Churchill, didn't start writing until he lost Britain to the Labour Party, who were dismantling the Empire he loved so much at record speed.
Always wondered how Churchill felt about that. He put the whole Empire in war to defend it and got to watch it all crumble as Attlee and subsequent PMs hastily dismantled it at the behest of America.
 
Always wondered how Churchill felt about that. He put the whole Empire in war to defend it and got to watch it all crumble as Attlee and subsequent PMs hastily dismantled it at the behest of America.
Churchill should have seen it coming really. Old FDR and his cronies never made it a secret that they wanted to dismantle the British Empire and planned on doing so after the war. The Atlantic Charter basically set the groundwork for it.
 
Churchill should have seen it coming really. Old FDR and his cronies never made it a secret that they wanted to dismantle the British Empire and planned on doing so after the war. The Atlantic Charter basically set the groundwork for it.
Wonder if Churchill regrets not taking the advice of Lord Halifax and Joseph Kennedy
 
1642010195213.png


I've seen this point presented convincingly once from Dr. Kenneth Harl talking about Byzantium- "Historians write history because they can't do politics", citing Anna Comnenos and Thucydides as examples. IMO on an inter-cultural level history gets written by the victors because they tend to have better access to education and publishing networks, or outright destroy their enemies' writings like the Romans did to Carthage. But within a culture it's written by the losers, because the victors are busy actually doing things. Most Imperial Roman history was written by Senators who hated the Imperial system, & even the most blatant example of the victor writing history, Winston Churchill, didn't start writing until he lost Britain to the Labour Party, who were dismantling the Empire he loved so much at record speed.
There was a time when Historians dominated government. Got some stinkers like Wilson, but overall the progressive era in the USA and Liberal era in Britain were pretty good. Austria-Hungary going nuts and pushing a minor incident into a World War was hardly their fault.
 
View attachment 2881308


There was a time when Historians dominated government. Got some stinkers like Wilson, but overall the progressive era in the USA and Liberal era in Britain were pretty good. Austria-Hungary going nuts and pushing a minor incident into a World War was hardly their fault.
Where do you think The Cynical Historian will be in 5 years? He seems to be loosing even more of his sanity every day.
 
1642055275706.png


AHH knows where to find schizos.

Where do you think The Cynical Historian will be in 5 years? He seems to be loosing even more of his sanity every day.
Just a Breadtuber.

I have talked with a few people who believe that they are transtioning, including one transperson who even has said "they definitely act like an egg".
 
One one hand, I've found this at the top of his user page:
On the other hand, I didn't watch it for fear of cringe, so it may be clickbait combined with trying to do everything he can to deny the problems with Soviet Arms.
The dumbest argument that they make in this video is that mass produced tanks like the Sherman and T-34 require exponentially more infrastructure and supplies to maintain than the small number artisanally crafted German tanks.

The whole point of these tanks is that that they were so simple and the parts so numerous that repairing them was easy. They were cheap to build and maintain. Having tanks along the entirety of your line is a pretty great advantage and the Allies could afford to maintain that huge cost. However, mass production itself significantly reduced that cost and the allies even stopped producing tanks because they had too many.

They also look at the tanks outside of their doctrine. Early German tanks and later Allied tanks both existed to fight infantry. In the early war the Germans used air power to destroy tanks and the Allies did the same in the latter part of the war. Tanks supported infantry. Comparing combat specs alone is very shallow.
 
The dumbest argument that they make in this video is that mass produced tanks like the Sherman and T-34 require exponentially more infrastructure and supplies to maintain than the small number artisanally crafted German tanks.

The whole point of these tanks is that that they were so simple and the parts so numerous that repairing them was easy. They were cheap to build and maintain. Having tanks along the entirety of your line is a pretty great advantage and the Allies could afford to maintain that huge cost. However, mass production itself significantly reduced that cost and the allies even stopped producing tanks because they had too many.

They also look at the tanks outside of their doctrine. Early German tanks and later Allied tanks both existed to fight infantry. In the early war the Germans used air power to destroy tanks and the Allies did the same in the latter part of the war. Tanks supported infantry. Comparing combat specs alone is very shallow.
This video sounds less like a actual historical take and more like bitching about the meta in war thunder/wot
"uuhm the T-34 and Sherman can't win a head to head engagement with the tiger 1 without certain strats so its shit"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slap47
I know everyone has said this, but I’m adding my name to Cypher/Cynical History getting a careercow thread eventually. His wannabe breadtubing and schitzo takes (which are just contradictory and confusing on all political/historical sides), in addition of him pursuing a “serious” career in academia has potential. I’m seeing Russel Greer levels of bloated self-worth if he thinks he can go into that career (granted, academia has been on a bad decline for decades now). Add the trans stuff @Slap47 suspects, we may have something interesting.
 
1642198183225.png


Kraut actually just being straight-up racist.

I know everyone has said this, but I’m adding my name to Cypher/Cynical History getting a careercow thread eventually. His wannabe breadtubing and schitzo takes (which are just contradictory and confusing on all political/historical sides), in addition of him pursuing a “serious” career in academia has potential. I’m seeing Russel Greer levels of bloated self-worth if he thinks he can go into that career (granted, academia has been on a bad decline for decades now). Add the trans stuff @Slap47 suspects, we may have something interesting.

Kiwifarms has a strange unwritten rule about most lolcows/careercows needing some explosive drama to initiate a thread. Maybe he'll start a doxxing server to destroy TIK or something.
 
Kiwifarms has a strange unwritten rule about most lolcows/careercows needing some explosive drama to initiate a thread. Maybe he'll start a doxxing server to destroy TIK or something.
Fair enough. I do feel like he’s teetering on the edge of an explosive meltdown (all the pieces in place). Again, he should EVENTUALLY get a thread, but until then, I’m keeping an eye on him.
 
View attachment 2887811

Kraut actually just being straight-up racist.



Kiwifarms has a strange unwritten rule about most lolcows/careercows needing some explosive drama to initiate a thread. Maybe he'll start a doxxing server to destroy TIK or something.
Interesting to see Kraut is still his 2016 self in regards to middle easterners (yes, he has always been like this).
 
Interesting to see Kraut is still his 2016 self in regards to middle easterners (yes, he has always been like this).
Like i'm pretty sure Kraut only courted right wing youtube in 2016 because muslim terror attacks in Europe had been especially nasty that year and the year before

That shit ended during Trump though, so Kraut had to deal with his second greatest foe, americans
 
It always boggles my mind their lies videos are longer than the actual episodes in their series.

Always wondered how Churchill felt about that. He put the whole Empire in war to defend it and got to watch it all crumble as Attlee and subsequent PMs hastily dismantled it at the behest of America.

Churchill would've had to have known it was inevitable, he was PM throughout the war and he knew how stretched the Empire was at the time both in terms of food and basic goods and military equipment.

There's a reason why the US got to keep so many WW2 ships around after the war and even make some into museum ships whereas the UK had to scrap most of theirs, let alone maintain any as museums for future generations.

Two world wars was simply too much for the British to bear, even though they walked away as winners they had been mortally wounded in terms of retaining their empire; this would be firmly driven home in the 1950s with the Suez Crisis when Eisenhower told France and the UK to fuck off.
 
Two world wars was simply too much for the British to bear, even though they walked away as winners they had been mortally wounded in terms of retaining their empire; this would be firmly driven home in the 1950s with the Suez Crisis when Eisenhower told France and the UK to fuck off.
The only country that won WWII was the United States.
 
tbh TIK is easily my favorite youtuber/history youtuber ( granted I am an Ancap ), dude makes wonderful content and puts tons of effort into his work without making stupid takes. God Bless Him
TIK is my man. That guy's alright. And, unlike almost the entirety of Historytube, he actually cites his sources, including first party sources, and does it in the video. As someone who actually studied history, its actually quite appreciated.
I simply like TIK for the fact he makes Redditors soyrage.
TIK is an autistic fuck who is so lolbert


1642567248078.png


1642567516697.png
1642567437757.png

1642567585371.png



Update to the TIK war.

Interesting comments.
 
Back