US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Sithis]

People seriously act like Twitter isn't a private company that can do w/e it wants when it wants. You don't pay for twitter. You have no rights on Twitter. Get off of it.

Well, that's where the issue with 230 comes in. Twitter gets protection from liability suits for content on its platform under the guise of being a "free speech platform". Yet they regularly engage in outright censorship of political opinions to the extent that the president called for them and other tech companies, on live tv, to step up their efforts and engage in more censorship.
They are free to do this, but doing so signifies them as editorialized, not free speech. Thus they should not receive such protections and should be liable in court for content on their platform if it breaks the law. After all, if their algorithm can use word filters and facial recognition to track and filter people who question a vaccine, where is the argument that it can't filter content that is specifically illegal. And that's not even addressing all the porn and the easy access they give kids to it.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

Well, that's where the issue with 230 comes in. Twitter gets protection from liability suits for content on its platform under the guise of being a "free speech platform". Yet they regularly engage in outright censorship of political opinions to the extent that the president called for them and other tech companies, on live tv, to step up their efforts and engage in more censorship.
They are free to do this, but doing so signifies them as editorialized, not free speech. Thus they should not receive such protections.

“Should Not” rarely if ever ends up as “Will Not”. In other words, life isn’t fair.

 

[LaxerBRO]

People seriously act like Twitter isn't a private company that can do w/e it wants when it wants. You don't pay for twitter. You have no rights on Twitter. Get off of it.

I just want them to admit it.

 

[Oats12345]

>Trump hopes that the hostages taken in Texas are saved
>15 minutes later, hostages all get safely rescued with the hostage taker being killed
Strongest proof of the Trump curse seen yet.

More evidence that God likes Trump. Also California has a tsunami warning!!

Also I what to know more of the Trump rally yesterday. What else did he talk about?

 

[LurkTrawl]

Well, that's where the issue with 230 comes in. Twitter gets protection from liability suits for content on its platform under the guise of being a "free speech platform". Yet they regularly engage in outright censorship of political opinions to the extent that the president called for them and other tech companies, on live tv, to step up their efforts and engage in more censorship.
They are free to do this, but doing so signifies them as editorialized, not free speech. Thus they should not receive such protections and should be liable in court for content on their platform if it breaks the law. After all, if their algorithm can use word filters and facial recognition to track and filter people who question a vaccine, where is the argument that it can't filter content that is specifically illegal. And that's not even addressing all the porn and the easy access they give kids to it.

That's not how section 230 works and it'd be better for everybody if the actual fucking problem (the banking system) were addressed rather than focus on something that could only possibly end destructively (editing 230).

 

[AnotherPleb]

That's not how section 230 works and it'd be better for everybody if the actual fucking problem (the banking system) were addressed rather than focus on something that could only possibly end destructively (editing 230).

Ask Gadhafi how well addressing the banking system goes.

 

[Slappy McGherkin]

Also I what to know more of the Trump rally yesterday. What else did he talk about?

Said that Biden has been more destructive to America in a year than 5 presidents combined. Cited inflation, people losing their jobs because of fucked up Covid policy, gas prices, and the Afghanistan debacle.

Also, finally talked about the J6 political prisoners, the horrible conditions they are being held under. Ray Epps being a glowie and "the dope" of an officer that killed Ashli Babbit.

I streamed it live and he was absolutely on fire. Glad I didn't go in person; supposedly a line of cars over 20 miles long trying to get into the venue, about 38,000 (max capacity) in attendance.

He was pure Trump start to finish.

 

[Seventh Star]

Before any of this, I want all the doomposters and corny blackpill motherfuckers to lose their internet connection until they learn how to stop running their mouth and learn how to control their constant negativity.

Agree. If you think things will go well, they will go well. Doomposting means you should hang yourself.

 

[Josterman]

Here is some of the reaction to the blacks for Trump event at Arizona which one tweet is listable for siraj hashmi and huge pro crt advocate,Biden simp and wokescold Kate(imspeaking13)
from blue check

and this

and this guy

 

[Celebrate Nite]

Here is some of the reaction to the blacks for Trump event at Arizona which one tweet is listable for siraj hashmiView attachment 2892161and huge pro crt advocate,Biden simp and wokescold Kate(imspeaking13)View attachment 2892162
from blue check
View attachment 2892163
and this
View attachment 2892164
and this guy
View attachment 2892165

Translation: "Those are CLEARLY paid shills"
Alt Translation: "Get back in the bucket you stupid crabs!!!"

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

People seriously act like Twitter isn't a private company that can do w/e it wants when it wants. You don't pay for twitter. You have no rights on Twitter. Get off of it.

I'll take my negrates for saying this, but this is one of the many problems I have with Western neoliberalism. As it is a cartel of businesses can act in the interests of a small elite and trample on the common good, and libertarian tards will defend that because "it's a private company, they can do what they want".

Businesses should be subject to the common good and ultimately to the state. The liberal idea that the invisible hand of the free market (read; the people who control the free market) should get to control society just leads to Trump being kicked off Twitter and big tech forcing troons down your throat.

 

[Oats12345]

Said that Biden has been more destructive to America in a year than 5 presidents combined. Cited inflation, people losing their jobs because of fucked up Covid policy, gas prices, and the Afghanistan debacle.

Also, finally talked about the J6 political prisoners, the horrible conditions they are being held under. Ray Epps being a glowie and "the dope" of an officer that killed Ashli Babbit.

I streamed it live and he was absolutely on fire. Glad I didn't go in person; supposedly a line of cars over 20 miles long trying to get into the venue, about 38,000 (max capacity) in attendance.

He was pure Trump start to finish.

Awsome sounds like he was really on point and on fire last night. Love how he gets Biden where it hurts!!

 

[Aidan]

I'll take my negrates for saying this, but this is one of the many problems I have with Western neoliberalism. As it is a cartel of businesses can act in the interests of a small elite and trample on the common good, and libertarian tards will defend that because "it's a private company, they can do what they want".

Businesses should be subject to the common good and ultimately to the state. The liberal idea that the invisible hand of the free market (read; the people who control the free market) should get to control society just leads to Trump being kicked off Twitter and big tech forcing troons down your throat.

Agreed overall though for me the solution isn't an easy one. It is certainly the case that a handful of companies have overwhelming influence on popular opinion and they use this maliciously.
One person's common good is another's evil.

 

[Josterman]

Translation: "Those are CLEARLY paid shills"
Alt Translation: "Get back in the bucket you stupid crabs!!!"

They think those black people who voted for trump are basically uncle tom‘s and they are no different than the likes of Richard spencer
just look at grifter accounts like “agolf twittler slayer” which is justa coward hiding behind a woman

or losers like Ron filipkowski who someone posted his dox in another thread

 

[AnotherPleb]

Translation: "Those are CLEARLY paid shills"
Alt Translation: "Get back in the bucket you stupid crabs!!!"

Alt alt Translation: "Know your place you uppity niggers."

I'll take my negrates for saying this, but this is one of the many problems I have with Western neoliberalism. As it is a cartel of businesses can act in the interests of a small elite and trample on the common good, and libertarian tards will defend that because "it's a private company, they can do what they want".

Businesses should be subject to the common good and ultimately to the state. The liberal idea that the invisible hand of the free market (read; the people who control the free market) should get to control society just leads to Trump being kicked off Twitter and big tech forcing troons down your throat.

'It's a private company' is the main reason I can never vote for Libertarians. Companies need checks on their powers even more than governments in the age of globohomo because they are otherwise completely unaccountable to the average person, but they keep buying out political whores who are more than happy to do nothing.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

One person's common good is another's evil

True, but all laws are based off someone's common good. I know people love to say "the state shouldn't legislate morality" as if it means anything, but the truth is that every law is rooted in someone's morality and basing societies off traditional Western, Christian morality instead of whatever Jeff Bezos thinks is okay works better for society at large.

'It's a private company' is the main reason I can never vote for Libertarians. Companies need checks on their powers even more than governments in the age of globohomo because they are otherwise completely unaccountable to the average person, but they keep buying out political whores who are more than happy to do nothing.

Libertarians have no problem with authoritarianism so long as multinationals are doing the authoritarianism instead of the state. For lolberts Twitter being able to censor anything it finds objectionable is fine, but the state being able to do that is literally Gilead, Nazi Germany and the USSR combined.

It is certainly the case that a handful of companies have overwhelming influence on popular opinion and they use this maliciously.

Definitely.

If you want to look at the problem from a classical liberal standpoint you'd probably solve it by, say, treating tech companies with a given number of users as "public squares" and stopping them moderating legal speech. I'm about as illiberal as they come but FWIW, that seems like a workable solution.

 

[AnotherPleb]

True, but all laws are based off someone's common good. I know people love to say "the state shouldn't legislate morality" as if it means anything, but the truth is that every law is rooted in someone's morality and basing societies off traditional Western, Christian morality instead of whatever Jeff Bezos thinks is okay works better for society at large.

Libertarians have no problem with authoritarianism so long as multinationals are doing the authoritarianism instead of the state. For lolberts Twitter being able to censor anything it finds objectionable is fine, but the state being able to do that is literally Gilead, Nazi Germany and the USSR combined.

Definitely.

If you want to look at the problem from a classical liberal standpoint you'd probably solve it by, say, treating tech companies with a given number of users as "public squares" and stopping them moderating legal speech. I'm about as illiberal as they come but FWIW, that seems like a workable solution.

Personally I would be fine with tech companies and banking companies being treated as public utilities. You want to suck on the government teat, you have to deal with government regulations regarding the first amendment.

 

[Salubrious]

Here is some of the reaction to the blacks for Trump event at Arizona which one tweet is listable for siraj hashmiView attachment 2892161and huge pro crt advocate,Biden simp and wokescold Kate(imspeaking13)View attachment 2892162
from blue check
View attachment 2892163
and this
View attachment 2892164
and this guy
View attachment 2892165

Nobody is more racist than a white liberal trying to speak "on behalf" of black people.

 

[Getting tard comed]

I'll take my negrates for saying this, but this is one of the many problems I have with Western neoliberalism. As it is a cartel of businesses can act in the interests of a small elite and trample on the common good, and libertarian tards will defend that because "it's a private company, they can do what they want".

Businesses should be subject to the common good and ultimately to the state. The liberal idea that the invisible hand of the free market (read; the people who control the free market) should get to control society just leads to Trump being kicked off Twitter and big tech forcing troons down your throat.

If only there was a system of governance that combined the goverment with private corporations .../sneed

Why isn't there a "right wing" twitter? Oh wait there is. There is Gab, there is Gettr, there was Parlor + a bunch of others. Use them. Or better yet, all the super wealthy mofos on the right can fund a loss leader like Twitter is so there's a platform for them. They won't because they value money/profits over control, power, and influence. That's fine but that's the choice that's been collectively made.

Twitter is not going to change. It is a known quantity at this point. Drumming up outrage over what they've always done now is grifting nothing more.

Lolbertarians are just as delusional as communists.

 

[Josterman]

Nobody is more racist than a white liberal trying to speak "on behalf" of black people.

View attachment 2892196

They are the white “messiah” and I use that term loosely since they are white Antichrist and according to these people logic blacks cant be racist when they are on their side but when they are on the other side of the political spectrum they are “racist uncle toms who support a ratzi” then again I said before these people supoorted jussie and were anti vaxx. They really need to A get off of Twitter or B shutdown the site since it’s not helping them and the Ls are showing


these people are no different than white supramcists but some how even worse