Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Miami]

LOL

Russ the only thing you get depressed over is not getting your dick wet when you demand it and what you only feel regret for is something like when a hooker outsmarts your dumb ass by spending the entire paid for time drinking herself into a stupor.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Either Russhole is lying his ass off here, being willfully obtuse, or he really is so fucking stupid and incompetent that he is incapable of understanding clear, simple English.

He's inventing an exception to the "any and all" clause by saying it doesn't apply to the ADA. It does. Since Freemantle has gone above and beyond in proving that Russ has a history of using the courts to force women to interact (fuck) with him and that he, by his own admission, files in bad faith and has done so here as well. I don't think he realized he's proved Freemantle's case for them, and all that's left is to kick the mess to arbitration and be done with it.

 

[AnOminous]

The Judge could rule now, if she so chose. But no, Russ won't be able to respond.

Fremantle has filed its motion and brief, Russ has responded well within the deadline, probably because he spent the whole weekend in a seething rage, gnashing his teeth and pounding out this absolutely garbage document. Thus, the matter is fully briefed and ripe for decision.

He's inventing an exception to the "any and all" clause by saying it doesn't apply to the ADA. It does.

The now-overruled 1997 case he relied on did say that. It said waiver of ADA rights had to be explicit. The now-sane view is that "any and all" actually means "any and all."

 

[Drowningman]

Russ picked a fight with a mountain that is about to crash down on him.
Mommy & Daddy can't save his ass this time.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Fremantle has filed its motion and brief, Russ has responded well within the deadline, probably because he spent the whole weekend in a seething rage, gnashing his teeth and pounding out this absolutely garbage document. Thus, the matter is fully briefed and ripe for decision.

I agree. Yet still, the clerk noted that Fremantle is entitled to respond if they chose to use that privilege.

 

[talk talk talk]

This was some really good work by Molly, et al.

They quickly sussed out that Russhole is a sexpest who fixates on celebrities. They had some investigator check out his background and found the easily accessible stuff like the Taylor Swift federal cases. Based on that, they did a deeper dive and found lots of records of Russhole's crazy sexpest past.

And then they executed on that information so well. They figured out Russ would have to "explain" everything, so they gave him lots of shit to explain. What Russ doesn't know is the "winning/losing" paradigm of litigation. In short, there are things you don't want to talk about in litigation. Every second you talk about them, you are losing. There are things you want to talk about and every second you talk about them you are winning.

But because Russhole is fucked in the head, he *wants* to talk about things that are losers. He *wants* to explain his sexpest lawsuits. He *wants* to explain how clever he was tricking the other side with his agreement to not oppose arbitration. But those are losers. Every second he talks about them he is losing.

His declaration? Losing.

Three and a half pages of his memo? Losing.

Molly, et al, have gotten all they could have wanted with this tactic. Pages and pages of losing. In their reply brief, they will go over Russ's past briefly, but really beat the hell out of him on the substance--the enforceability of the arbitration agreement.

 

[AnOminous]

I agree. Yet still, the clerk noted that Fremantle is entitled to respond if they chose to use that privilege.

But if they are, and I think it would be a very brief document and that they may decide to completely forego it, they'd best file it pretty quickly. I honestly don't see anything Russ said that should be dignified with a response. I did a really cursory read, though, his documents are painfully boring, but if you pick at any actual citation to a case, he's usually wrong. Like the ADA thing.

Shepardize or jeopardize bitch.

 

[DrJonesHat]

But if they are, and I think it would be a very brief document and that they may decide to completely forego it, they'd best file it pretty quickly. I honestly don't see anything Russ said that should be dignified with a response. I did a really cursory read, though, his documents are painfully boring, but if you pick at any actual citation to a case, he's usually wrong. Like the ADA thing.

Shepardize or jeopardize bitch.

This may have been answered, but when it's sent to arbitration, can Russ bog things down by appealing the ruling or can the court just say "not our problem anymore, go away."

 

[The Great Citracett]

The Farrah Abrams information is really interesting..I keep going back to it since not a lot is known about his early years. But he wrote a song for her (;as he does for every woman he wants) but has anyone heard the song or know what it's called?

Hey, guess what? Found the Farrah Abraham song and a bunch of other early vids that were uploaded to mixtape and lost because they weren't posted directly to the site.

Here's what I found so far. Might also upload to my youtube channel because why the hell not?

Win A Date With Farrah Abraham

Spoiler: All The Rest

Date with Farrah 2

AGT Audition 1

AGT Audition 2

AGT Audition 3

Has the looks of Heidi Klum

Legalizing Brothels

Donate to the Taylor Kickstarter

Swiftly Wooing Taylor

I Get You Taylor Swift

Date with Bella (brothel girl)

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I did a really cursory read, though, his documents are painfully boring, but if you pick at any actual citation to a case, he's usually wrong. Like the ADA thing.

I read all of it. Tldr:
About 80% of it is him being angry that Fremantle dared to mention his other lawsuits and him trying to explain them away.
The other 20% focused on how the agreement is invalid (All arguments either use citations from outside the 9th circuit, or outdated SCOTUS and 9th circuit cases)

This may have been answered, but when it's sent to arbitration, can Russ bog things down by appealing the ruling or can the court just say "not our problem anymore, go away."

Russ has stated that he intends to appeal the motion to compel if granted. You can appeal a denial of motion to compel (see Zoller v. GCA Advisors, LLC, 20-15595 (9th Cir. 2021) ) as well as the granting of such motion (see Kim Ngo v. Bmw of North America, LLC, 20-56027 (9th Cir. 2022) )

Hey, guess what? Found the Farrah Abraham song and a bunch of other early vids that were uploaded to mixtape and lost because they weren't posted directly to the site.

Here's what I found so far. Might also upload to my youtube channel because why the hell not?

Win A Date With Farrah Abraham
View attachment 2966093

Spoiler: All The Rest

Date with Farrah 2
View attachment 2966141

AGT Audition 1
View attachment 2966125

AGT Audition 2
View attachment 2966123

AGT Audition 3
View attachment 2966124

Has the looks of Heidi Klum
View attachment 2966142

Legalizing Brothels
View attachment 2966140

Donate to the Taylor Kickstarter
View attachment 2966151

Swiftly Wooing Taylor
View attachment 2966147

I Get You Taylor Swift
View attachment 2966144

Date with Bella (brothel girl)
View attachment 2966229

Great work!

 

[AnOminous]

Luckily there's a fairly recent article on this and the 9th Circuit's view:

https://www.appellateinsight.com/2021/03/05/appealing-motions-to-compel-arbitration-in-federal-court/

Russ has stated that he intends to appeal the motion to compel if granted. You can appeal a denial of motion to compel (see Zoller v. GCA Advisors, LLC, 20-15595 (9th Cir. 2021) ) as well as the granting of such motion (see Kim Ngo v. Bmw of North America, LLC, 20-56027 (9th Cir. 2022) )

He shouldn't take much comfort in that.

Arbitration proceedings are not automatically stayed pending an appeal, although the district court has discretion to grant a party’s request to stay arbitration.

So his obligation to arbitrate kicks in immediately even if he does appeal. A dismissed case is final, so a party where the judge grants the arbitration motion but refuses to grant the motion to dismiss leaves the arbitration motion unappealable, or more accurately, it would have to be an interlocutory appeal or mandamus or something of that nature.

But the judge could stay its own order on the arbitration pending appeal and it would actually be in the plaintiff's favor for the case to be dismissed and become appealable. I'd love to see him take a foray into Ninth Circuit appellate practice and its marathon briefing schedule.

And after that, generally another 6-10 months at least for normal cases. A simple no-brainer slam-dunk like this would, I'd venture, come in at the low end of that.

Meanwhile he's obligated to arbitrate anyway.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Not related to the current Russ milk bonanza, but the "win a date" with Farrah Abraham thing was shown to be nothing more than a photo op for her. It was heavily chaperoned, there was absolutely no physical contact between the winner and Farrah, and the "winner" paid for the privilege. Russ was expecting to be alone with her so he could pull out his patented wooing words.

 

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

With all the bolding and dramatic use of caps in this document, it's only a matter of time until Russell starts switching up the fonts too.

Actually, I saw a couple different fonts in his latest. You can always tell by comparing the Greers.

Also, his exhibits are all fucked up/missing. Again.

I'm looking forward to a side gig as a paralegal at this rate.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Russ has stated that he intends to appeal the motion to compel if granted. You can appeal a denial of motion to compel (see Zoller v. GCA Advisors, LLC, 20-15595 (9th Cir. 2021) ) as well as the granting of such motion (see Kim Ngo v. Bmw of North America, LLC, 20-56027 (9th Cir. 2022) )

Well, Molly doesn't care probably. Those are billable hours. Is there anything Freemantle can do to make him admit defeat or can he drag this out all the way to SCOTUS?

I'm looking forward to a side gig as a paralegal at this rate.

Given the amount of legal explanations and citations in this thread, I think I could skip a year of law school and still pass the bar.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Also, his exhibits are all fucked up/missing. Again.

What do you mean?

 

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

What do you mean?

For example, in the recent document 33, he refers to an Exhibit D that isn't attached. In the same document, he states that Exhibit B substantiates his claim that he was "discriminated" by Ariana, but it's just the picture of them taken at the meet and greet.

It's the same pattern of the exhibits not being there or not saying what he says they say.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Well, Molly doesn't care probably. Those are billable hours. Is there anything Freemantle can do to make him admit defeat or can he drag this out all the way to SCOTUS?

Read the article @AnOminous linked. It's a really good article, and it does explain how Fremantle can make sure that Russ doesn't waste their time with needless appeals.

For example, in the recent document 33, he refers to an Exhibit D that isn't attached.

Good catch!

 

[Iron Hamster]

yet brings up his suit against nool and Kiwi Farms (a website), which has fuck all to do with anything, while heavily implying Zac & Molly omitted it out of malice.

Bet their interest is piqued now.
I raked in the cash on this one.
1) would be condescending about Molly beating him down
2) would need 'to explain'
3) throw in the farms for good measure.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Read the article @AnOminous linked. It's a really good article, and it does explain how Fremantle can make sure that Russ doesn't waste their time with needless appeals.

Ah, now I see. Oh, he's gonna lose his goddamn mind when he's told he can't appeal. That worries me, because as long Russ thinks he can get what he wants via the courts, he's annoying but fairly harmless. If that gets taken away, I'm not sure how he'll respond, but it won't be pretty. As I recall, the law office is LA right? That's too far a bus or train for Russ, and he doesn't fly, so they're safe. But Freemantle has offices in Vegas if I'm not mistaken. It would not be a stretch to think Russ might go there and demand to speak to a producer or whoever and be let on the show right this instant!

Bet their interest is piqued now.
I raked in the cash on this one.
1) would be condescending about Molly beating him down
2) would need 'to explain'
3) throw in the farms for good measure.

Too bad we can't play for real money here.

 

[SunburnNation]

The Judge could rule now, if she so chose. But no, Russ won't be able to respond.

Does that mean that we're now waiting on the judge's decision, or is the ball back in Fremantle's court? And if it's the latter, at what point does the judge just slam down the gavel and end this farce?