Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
I wonder when this ends will we have some more pearls...
View attachment 2967214 archive
Russell's need to constantly praise himself while belittling others is hysterical to me. He's so bitter and egotistical that he can't write a goddamn legal document without reminding everyone how much better he is than everyone else.

Oh my days. This arsehole (who is now claiming discrimination under the ADA, mind) seriously wanted to go on prime time TV and say the third step to overcoming your disability is to fucking DANCE lmao

(also, Mobious is a new one)

ETA: Now with more actual dancing, in a way that helps with your disability.
To a prelim judge for AGT, the fact that his whole act is "love yourself! Be who you are!" While his desire is for everyone else to do all the work to make him fanous while everyone else gets all the glory should be your first clue besides the obvious physical appearance that something is off about this guy. Everything Russell does screams "insincere, fame hungry loser" and he doesn't even realize it.
 
Hey, guess what? Found the Farrah Abraham song and a bunch of other early vids that were uploaded to mixtape and lost because they weren't posted directly to the site.

Here's what I found so far. Might also upload to my youtube channel because why the hell not?

Win A Date With Farrah Abraham
View attachment 2966093

Date with Farrah 2
View attachment 2966141

AGT Audition 1
View attachment 2966125

AGT Audition 2
View attachment 2966123

AGT Audition 3
View attachment 2966124

Has the looks of Heidi Klum
View attachment 2966142

Legalizing Brothels
View attachment 2966140

Donate to the Taylor Kickstarter
View attachment 2966151

Swiftly Wooing Taylor
View attachment 2966147

I Get You Taylor Swift
View attachment 2966144

Date with Bella (brothel girl)
View attachment 2966229
1644338911612.png

1644338947426.png
 

Oh my days. This arsehole (who is now claiming discrimination under the ADA, mind) seriously wanted to go on prime time TV and say the third step to overcoming your disability is to fucking DANCE lmao

(also, Mobious is a new one)

ETA: Now with more actual dancing, in a way that helps with your disability.
The man crying about how the disabled are not given equal opportunity invites you to come up and accept yourself by dancing.
If you're in a wheelchair than ummm er....
 
One thing that I really am wondering is whether Russell still has a computer? I ask this since all the emails he uses as part of this exhibits are done through phone screenshots. It really is such an odd thing and I wonder why he does this.
You'll also note all his signatures are those terrible phone touchscreen signatures.
 
So much has been said already, but for the non-legal Kiwis, his repeated reference to “puffery” is his misunderstanding of yet another first-year legal term. It means exaggerated statements in advertising that aren’t meant to be taken literally. So the idea is that if someone sells you a chocolate bar by saying “it will take you to heaven and back”, you generally can’t sue them if you do not actually go to heaven and back when you eat it. Their statement was “mere puffery”.

I haven’t heard the wording used in real life for years. It definitely in no way applies to agreeing to arbitration and then changing your mind. He’s just being fucking stupid again. He admitted in his declaration that he agreed to arbitration during the phone call.

His repeated implications that Lens is stupid (eg. “any college educated person” or “an average minded person”) are just pathetic. He’s such a nasty little misogynist sex pest.
 
Except that Russhole DID agree to arbitration.
Excuse me?? You are being very deceptive and unprofessional. Russell MISSPOKE momentarily while using psychological tactics, as he himself admitted.
Isn't it highly rumored that Russ wrote that letter from Hof himself?
It hasn't been established as a fact, but it's the inference any reasonable person would draw from reading the letter.
Did you see his shirt in the "I Get You" early pitch?

Just skip through and look at the front of his shirt.

If you can come at this video with fresh eyes, Russ has a bit of charm here similar to early Chris Chan. (Think of the "Future Message" video.) All you really see is his naive optimism; you can't tell that he has the soul of a deranged rapist.
 
So much has been said already, but for the non-legal Kiwis, his repeated reference to “puffery” is his misunderstanding of yet another first-year legal term. It means exaggerated statements in advertising that aren’t meant to be taken literally. So the idea is that if someone sells you a chocolate bar by saying “it will take you to heaven and back”, you generally can’t sue them if you do not actually go to heaven and back when you eat it. Their statement was “mere puffery”.

I haven’t heard the wording used in real life for years. It definitely in no way applies to agreeing to arbitration and then changing your mind. He’s just being fucking stupid again. He admitted in his declaration that he agreed to arbitration during the phone call.

His repeated implications that Lens is stupid (eg. “any college educated person” or “an average minded person”) are just pathetic. He’s such a nasty little misogynist sex pest.
It's not even that he changed his mind. He proposed the Arbitration agreement, and admits in true Russ fashion that he never had any intention of honoring it. It was pure bad faith, which he admits to in his own filings. Thinking he is pulling some sort of clever psyop on the meanie lawyers.
 
So much has been said already, but for the non-legal Kiwis, his repeated reference to “puffery” is his misunderstanding of yet another first-year legal term. It means exaggerated statements in advertising that aren’t meant to be taken literally. So the idea is that if someone sells you a chocolate bar by saying “it will take you to heaven and back”, you generally can’t sue them if you do not actually go to heaven and back when you eat it. Their statement was “mere puffery”.


His repeated implications that Lens is stupid (eg. “any college educated person” or “an average minded person”) are just pathetic. He’s such a nasty little misogynist sex pest.
Reminded me of this...
1644340662404.png
Article Link

I just see him as a sexually frustrated, little willy sort of bloke. A bit like the other spineless predatory legal expert on this site who fears and loathes women and talks big online...
 
"Defendants attempt to hurtfully portray Greer in a false light with many things that Greer has suffered severe depression and regret with"

A random.txt worthy quote. It's not false light if it's true, shitlips. And if you hadn't done the things you were portrayed as doing, you couldn't suffer regret for doing them.

"Despite Defendants' contentions, Greer's family stands behind him with the Grande case and they agree what she did to him was not OK."

Completely irrelevant, but hilarious that he's trying to make his family witnesses. I almost wish there was a chance his parents might get subpoenaed. I bet they'd be thrilled to be hauled into court to explain their little sexpest.
 
Reminded me of this...
View attachment 2967899 Article Link

I just see him as a sexually frustrated, little willy sort of bloke. A bit like the other spineless predatory legal expert on this site who fears and loathes women and talks big online...
That Red Bull media situation is an indictment on the whole of the USA, surely. I’d love it if a USA lawfag could explain what really happened, because SURELY no court accepted that dumbfucks thought they would grow wings if they drank it. I bet it’s a media creation, like they did about the woman who was severely burned by a drive-through coffee.
 
It's not even that he changed his mind. He proposed the Arbitration agreement, and admits in true Russ fashion that he never had any intention of honoring it. It was pure bad faith, which he admits to in his own filings. Thinking he is pulling some sort of clever psyop on the meanie lawyers.
The best part of his "it was just a hypothetical scenario" argument is that even in his hypothetical scenarios he can't conscience suggesting that he might have to pay his own arbitration fees - you know, like he'd be obliged to do under the contract he signed. Hypothetically.

Kinda undermines his whole "they were just hypothetical" argument if he was only suggesting hypothetical scenarios that were acceptable to him, until they called his bluff and agreed to his proposed resolution. And suddenly it wasn't acceptable to him anymore, because he admits that he made it in bad faith - which is incredibly hard to believe that even he could think portrays him in a positive light.
 
So much has been said already, but for the non-legal Kiwis, his repeated reference to “puffery” is his misunderstanding of yet another first-year legal term. It means exaggerated statements in advertising that aren’t meant to be taken literally. So the idea is that if someone sells you a chocolate bar by saying “it will take you to heaven and back”, you generally can’t sue them if you do not actually go to heaven and back when you eat it. Their statement was “mere puffery”.

I haven’t heard the wording used in real life for years. It definitely in no way applies to agreeing to arbitration and then changing your mind. He’s just being fucking stupid again. He admitted in his declaration that he agreed to arbitration during the phone call.

His repeated implications that Lens is stupid (eg. “any college educated person” or “an average minded person”) are just pathetic. He’s such a nasty little misogynist sex pest.
With all his talk about "puffery" and "puffing up his chest" in his latest lawsuit, I think he needs a @BOLDYSPICY! pufferfish avatar.
 
Completely irrelevant, but hilarious that he's trying to make his family witnesses. I almost wish there was a chance his parents might get subpoenaed. I bet they'd be thrilled to be hauled into court to explain their little sexpest.
I got distracted earlier and found myself starting to read from the beginning of this thread (yeah, sad I know). I soon noticed that Greer always brings others into his argument, always. He can't just say it's his opinion full stop... he has to say my mates, my family, a police officer, lowcows elsewhere online, bandmates, Hof, online posters etc "agree with me"- even down to folks, allegedly, telling him he's a great lyricist (wtte)...hell he even tried, unsuccessfully, to introduce a legal bod's opinion (who apparently agreed with Greer) into the Arianna (iirc) case to strengthen his "arguments"...

1644341822289.png
 
Catching up on this thread has been wild.

The best thing about lolcows is how they constantly repeat the same behaviours over and over again, never learning because they’re either too stupid to understand or that they just can’t conceive ever being wrong.
Obviously, with Rusty, it’s the latter. He’s like a chihuahua constantly trying to attack bigger dogs. Sure, he might nip them on the nob occasionally, but he always ends up getting absolutely bodied, and he keeps thinking that next time will be his time, but he’s running out of luck and one of those warning bites is gonna hit the jugular.

Having Molly, a woman who immediately saw right through him, be the herald of his demise, would just be the icing on the cake.
He’d hate it too, a woman who both dared to deny him his plights and did not suck him his penis.

I have no doubt that he will slimeball his way out of this and live to sue another day, but a girl can dream.
 
Hahaha wait. This part's even better.

"46. In Ms. Len's declaration ... she declares that Russell Greer agreed to arbitrate.
"47 I was upset ... because it simply was not true.
"48 While I do not want to accuse Ms. Lens of committing perjury, I will say that she has misrepresented my views...
"49. I decided to write this declaration of my own to show that in no where did I tell Ms. Lens I would agree to arbitrate, aside from the phone"

She's MISREPRESENTING TO THE COURT that I agreed to arbitrate! I DECLARE THAT I NEVER AGREED TO ARBITRATE, aside from when I did, but that totally didn't count for reasons!
 
Back