Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

The brony moderator scored another victory over Michael and Adam, provoking some sperg outs by protecting an article they were trying to fight over.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:No_platform#Protection

And also you haven't bothered to actually address the content concerns I put forward and are instead perpetuating this petty dispute you have with me over what is apparently both Gamergate and My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic.—Ryulong (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It should be telling that you bring that up more than me. The answer remains no--"Paravant"Talk & Contribs 01:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It's because you're trying to avoid it and instead insist that the disproportionate use of your moderator and sysop tools against me has any actual foundation in trying to uphold the policies of this website when it instead stems from the petty personal dispute between us. There's no point in protecting this page other than it's me providing conflicting edits. There was no point in fully protecting List of Gamergate claims when I was copying over a citation other than it was me. It's blatantly obvious. Unprotect the page. Stop being like this. Treat me fairly for once. Because right now it's a repeat of every other time you've decided to police my actions on this website. You refuse to acknowledgeanything but my complaints about you and ignore my actual attempts to discuss the content of the page for the sake of being slighted two months ago. Judge my proposed changes. Unprotect the page so I can impliment them. Stop this nonsense.—Ryulong (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

See that's the problem. What you say becomes less true every time you say it. Also, people disagree with your version, so no, I won't let you edit war over it. Grow the fuck up and get used to being oppossed--"Paravant"Talk & Contribs 01:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:No_platform#Page_protection

And Paravant has extended the page protection to a full week which is still bullshit. If I was reprimanded for revdelling something that I thought was genuinely libelous, then Paravant is definitely abusing sysop tools when there's no possible threat of disruption stemming from any of this.—Ryulong (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
After seeing Ryulong do the same type of shit to other people for years it's immensely satisfying seeing him get a taste of his own medicine.

Honestly, I'm probably enjoying this way too much for my own good.
 
Cohen and Adam just coordinated an attack against Paravant, trying once more to fuck with the My Little Pony article, then throwing a tantrum at the Chicken Coop when Paravant slapped their hands away for edit warring over the same shit from October.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=My_Little_Pony:_Friendship_Is_Magic&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:My_Little_Pony:_Friendship_Is_Magic#Edit_warriors

06:39, 1 December 2015Paravant (Talk | contribs)‎ . . (-275)‎ . . (Undo revision 1579058 by Ryulong (talk)We went over this last time, you don't get to turn this article into your hit piece on the fandom just because you dont like them)

06:40, 1 December 2015Kitsunelaine (Talk | contribs)‎ . . (+859)‎ . . (but just HOW MANY REFS do we need to justify this in a way that would please you? just ctrl+f propaganda. But please, keep restoring the version that says it's just one blogger and doesn't elaborate :))

Enough's enough, Paravant. There are a dozen citations criticizing the film. Just because you don't like the criticism doesn't make that sentence a hitpiece. Drop this bullshit grudge against me and actually let the edit stand.—Ryulong (talk) 06:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

And once again Paravant you're abusing the sysop AND moderator tools just so you can have YOUR way in an edit war with me. Why won't you allow ANY criticism of the MLP fandom to stand? Why are you ignoring the dozen links Kitsunelaine and I provided that point out the criticisms of this one film? Is it because it isn't Roger Fucking Ebert?—Ryulong (talk) 06:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

i can find dozens of citations supporting the film, numbers mean nothing. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

But the point is that it's criticism of the film.—Ryulong (talk) 06:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Also, pot, meet kettle. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

At least I never abused the tools over something as fucking trivial as cartoon horses.—Ryulong (talk) 06:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

No, you just abused them over something as trivial as "I didn't like what you said so I revdelled it and got mad when that got undone"--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm just sitting here eating popcorn, noting that Ryu and Kitsunelaine are precisely the tag team I believed them to be. [Bowing back out of here.]---Mona- (talk) 06:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

It is extraordinarily evident he is doing this because of a grudge against you, Ryulong. He only ever jumped in when you edited the page. There is nothing wrong with the edit that I was trying to make. Tielec undid the edit to ask for cites, which I was in the middle of looking to provide, but the SECOND you undid the undo, he jumped in to abuse the shit out of his mod powers. My edit remained on the site for over 20 minutes before Tielec undid it, and Paravant was active through this, apparently having no justification to jump here until he saw YOUR name on the edit history in the recent changes section. The fact of the matter is that Paravant DID NOT CARE about my edit until you put it back in with the cites that Tielec was asking for. This is blatant abusal, and there is no way Paravant can talk his way out of that being the case. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 06:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

The more you make this a story of me not liking Ryulong due to a grudge, the less true it becomes. And its more that I didn't notice your edit, I don't see all things. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Bull. Fucking. Shit.

The moment you saw Ryu editing the page you stepped in to stop him. You didn't even bother to provide a fucking reason. You didn't look. You just saw "Ryulong" and shat your pants. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 06:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Adam then launched phase 2 of their plan, taking Paravant to the Chicken Coop, where he went into a giant TL:biggrin:R autism rant about how evil Paravant is for not letting Ryulong shit up the MLP article.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki_talk:chicken_coop

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:chicken_coop&oldid=1579206

The more you insist that this is because I do not like Ryulong, the less true it becomes. Furthermore, I dislike Ryulong because almost his entire time here on this wiki has been filled with Drama f his own causing, whether it be GG, MLP, or any other show. My opposition to his version is summed by Tielec comments. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 07:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

I love the smell of victim blaming in the morning. It smells like napalm.—Ryulong (talk) 07:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm surprised how you can smell it given how much you reek of playing the victim. You're an unapologetic ass who cannot fathom the concept that people disagree with you for any reason besides a personal grudge, you apparently cannot step away from wiki editing, by your own admission, because somebody said something you didn't like "and just had to argue with them", you've attempted, and through david, succeeded in owning articles on this wiki. There's little to like about you. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 07:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

This thread here at the Farms was mentioned.

My crime was editing Wikipedia in a way that Gamergaters didn't like and there was no level of changing my screennames or whatever you have it that would have made me joining here any different. But sure. I'm at fault for being despised by reactionary shitheels.—Ryulong (talk) 07:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You feed your watchers and chasers Ryulong. You're the perfect target exactly because of things like "I wanted to LANCB but somebody said something I didn't like so that was over in less than a day" There's a reason you have an entire thread on you, and it isn't solely because you are anti-GG --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 07:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

The reason there's a thread is because the only thing that separates you from them is a political ideology.—Ryulong (talk) 07:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Try again, but make sense this time.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 07:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You are an asshole as is anyone else mocking me. The only difference betwen you and Gamergaters is that you don't quip that it's actually about ethics in video game journalism.—Ryulong (talk) 07:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

See, its comments like that. This "I have done nothing wrong how can people not like me" attitude. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 07:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Expressing a negative opinion of an online mob shouldn't result in all the shit that's happened. Much like trying to eliminate the useless brony puffery shouldn't have resulted in a fucking multiple month edit war perpetuated by the both of us.—Ryulong (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

No, expressing a negative opinion on GG shouldn't have, but your personality meant nothing else ever would have come of it. You're far to combative for your own good. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 08:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Paravant proposed a sort of topic ban between himself and Cohen, which Adam happily supported when Paravant said he wouldn't use mod tools. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=1579188

A veteran RWer called Ace dogpiled onto Paravant at the coop to bitch about some of his recent actions which had caused butthurt in Ace, and, stupidly, this resulted in Cohen's scheme working. In response to Ace's accusations. Paravant voluntarily blocked himself and stepped away from RW for two weeks in order to clear his head, blaming a 3-month dramafest over Israel-Palestine for "wrecking" him.

Gloating, Adam then tried to say he wasn't tag teaming with Cohen and was totally at RW on his own volition, despite the abundant evidence to the contrary such as Adam snickering over Twitter over "pissing off bronies" with Ryulong back in October and blatantly editing for Cohen on Wikipedia after Mikey was banned.

Hey man, you do whatever you need to do. But from one former jackass to a current jackass - pull your shit together. Acei9 08:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm not Ace, but I can say that you should go ahead and take all the time you need. Being in that state of mind is never good. For what it's worth, I don't have anything against you on a personal level. I'd be a massive hypocrite if I held a grudge for someone who acted out in a bad mood over a grudge. Ryu's a friend, and I'd just had enough of seeing these fights. I do want to assure you that I am here of my own accord, though, and have my own interests in editing at RW, because there are a lot of things I care about-- I'm more than a tag team partner, as some would have you think, even if we do ideologically line up. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 08:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 
This is a thread about Ryulong (Micheal Cohen IRL), a man on a mission to make sure every place he submits content to that has anything to do with Gamergate tells the story his way, and that way means "GAMERGATE IS HITLER".

Yeah, I went there, but as you'll see, that's not far off.

First, he has an ED article

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Ryulong

Now, everyone knows you should take ED with a mountain of salt, but in this case, most of the information is quite accurate, so let's cover his banishment from Wikipedia.

Wikipedia used to be Ryulong's home turf, and from there, when he wasn't dominating articles about sentai shows, he was like that guy in 1984 who sounded like a duck, who, and I paraphrase the book here:

"had a furious, violent desire to denounce anyone who did not consider Gamergaters as the vilest of thought criminals."

However, as this page and it's subpages indicate, his abuse of power, harassment of users, and making certain pages his property resulted in Wikipedia deciding he had to go:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Ryulong

Which resulted in his permanent banishment, which resulted in him leaving this parting shot on his page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ryulong



It should be mentioned, however, Ryulong had his reasons for being a white knight:

https://archive.is/rWYUs

Basically, he had a blatant bias and used what power he had on Wikipedia to enforce it.

He also decided to whine about his banishment from Wikipedia on Reddit, and no less a person that Jimbo Wales himself told him to get over it:

Ryulongonreddit.png



Of course, this didn't mean his war was over, he just went to Rational Wiki to continue fighting, and here's some pages you can read to see, just like on Wikipedia, he has an agenda to push, and if he has to be an asshole to do it, it's for a good cause, fuck Gamergaters:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Timeline_of_Gamergate

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop

Of course, he did get voted for a block on RW for pulling the same shit that got him booted off Wikipedia, complete with the same histrionic bitching about how he's just trying to do the right thing and fighting evil trolls:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop/Archive37#Ryulong

He was then resysoped less than a day later:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong#Sysoped



Basically, they refused to kick him out so they could deny his enemies a chance to crow about it, even though they reached a community vote he had to go. Then again, if you read the talk pages above, he has a lot more people willing to defend his actions than he did on Wikipedia.

In essence, Ryulong is a histronic bully who insists on pushing his version of how things should go on any wiki he has power and influence over, and he has no shame or restraint using those powers to make sure things go his way, and if he has to shit all over people to do it, he will, and like all lolcows, he takes losing that power and being called out pretty badly.

More links:

http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/846191-gamergate

http://8ch.net/ggrevolt/res/16839.html

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showforum=45 (that's right, an entire subforum about this guy)

http://bleach.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong (it isn't just Gamergate he's an ass about)

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=5421

http://theralphretort.com/lol-sjw-thug-ryulong-booted-from-wikipedia-0128015/

http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAct...ulong_is_working_with_the_gamerghazi_mods_to/ (yeah, like Ryulong cares about little things called "conflicts of interest")

https://twitter.com/Ryulong

http://www.rangerboard.com/showthread.php?t=172431

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=Ryulong (yeah, he's a troper, surprised?)

http://techraptor.net/content/wikipedia-attempts-redeem-neutrality-gamergate-article (techraptor article about Ryulong's naked bias and hypocrisy)

http://ryulong.info/ Tumblr.

https://archive.moe/m/search/username/ryulong/tripcode/!!X20mO9bchxe/ Some of his posts on 4chan's /m/


http://forums.henshinjustice.com/showthread.php?14634-Who-s-Ryulong/page2 (Ryulong was an asshole going several years back)

http://www.rangercrew.com/forum/showthread.php?30624-Wikipedia-Adios-Ryulong

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/81659.html

http://blogjob.com/oneangrygamer/20...dia-editors-banned-over-gamergate-wiki-entry/

Ryudong is someone I've strongly considered Wiki-ing once the Wu project is done. Your thoughts, Kiwis?
 
When you get in an argument with a brony and you end up looking like the most immature manchild in the room, it's time to leave the Internet.

Ryudong is someone I've strongly considered Wiki-ing once the Wu project is done. Your thoughts, Kiwis?
I think that sounds cool, if only because I'd like to see how someone whose life revolves around wikis reacts to a wiki article dedicated to pointing and laughing at him.
 
Oh, man, I'm reading through Ryulong's userpage archive right now. Here are some rather amusing quotes from it.

But am I supposed to suffer to a STEMlord on Talk:Anita Sarkeesian now?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

You could just stop replying. You don't get to block people you don't feel like talking to anymore.--Miekal 07:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

You really have no clue as to what has been going on with all these assholes do you?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

You've got me, been here 4 years as an undercover troll just in case Ryulong ever came over here. You've read through my ruse like an open book, to enact long-standing community standards that mean we tend not to take information outside of RW into account when judging behaviour on-wiki. Oh woe is me; undone by the two smartest users on the wiki. PS. how did you know I was a he? Tielec01 (talk) 01:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

How do you know so much about me, it's like you are a mind reader, get out of my head! Please tell me what I was in a previous life too, I suspect I may have been a pharaoh. Tielec01 (talk) 08:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Did you fucking sign up here because my melt down is being tracked on some gator forum?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

You really need to take a break.

You've been editing the Gamergate article for like 9 hours straight, dude. You're editing it every day. This is behaviour that has already gotten you banned from Wikipedia. You should take a break. Seriously, this isn't healthy behaviour, you're starting to remind me uncomfortably of Ken DeMeyer. Take a holiday, yah? Let someone else worry about it. --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 10:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

The effort I'm putting into the page might actually get me work and my social life has been dead ever since I came back to the states.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

But what about my SJWcoins?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:58, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

It's hard training sea lions even with my oceanography degree.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Ryulong, if you don't what your mistakes to be used against you, perhaps you could try getting it right first time? Bicyclewheel 18:55, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Stop paying attention to it then for fucks sake.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Because I didn't filter what I thought about bullshit ideas like yours and others and my participation on the Gamergate page was the perfect shit storm for people like you to remove me from Wikipedia because of my checkered history on the website and the fact that I pointed out in the 11th hour that assholes like you were planning on using the proposal that ArbCom in their massive myopia thought would solve problems by restricting me to a single revert on a page a day by flooding the articles completely unrelated to Gamergate with edits that I had for many years opposed due to the fact that they are not and never have been supported by reliable sources but that didn't stop the assholes on /m/ who think I'm responsible for every fucking shit translation out there by thinking I'm wrong and a cancer in the toku fandom. It really has absolutely nothing to do with any personal stance I may have on Gamergate or the fact that I think you're a complete tool. It more has to do with how I tried to make sure pages I was interested in were best updated and maintained in line with Wikipedia's various rules and regulations that got me into plenty of fucking stupid arguments over content where I opposed people who were just as stubborn and pigheaded as I was. You know. Like how you idiots still think Zoe Quinn had sex for a review from Nathan Grayson despite he never reviewed shit and only ever wrote "Depression Quest" twice in his career and that was never when he was sexually involved with her or that Anita Sarkeesian has somehow scammed people out of $100 grand because you think that she faked all the abuse sent to her for going "I want to talk about video games" and possessing ovaries.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Do you have to contest every edit to the Gamergate article?

How about some more edits because you keep cutting shit out that takes away from the narrative and meaning.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure how often you log onto ED, but Tyciol has left a message for you. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

he can eat a dick.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

salad1.jpg

salad2.jpg

salad3.jpg

salad4.jpg

:story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story:

"My username is a combination of Husky and Harlot because for some time I had an interest in salads."

"Don't feed the trolls" is bullshit.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

KINKSHAME THE HORSEFUCKERS—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Unlock the page. Add back the content concerning criticism of "Derpy Hooves" and how people perceived it as ableist. Add back the content concerning the "Ask Princess Molestia" blog. Maybe add back the content concerning that fan character made by the kid with SMA. Or not. That one is weak. That's all I am requesting. Also to maybe cut back on the defensiveness of the fandom.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry that as a gay man who is still in the closet that I'm not allowed to think that part of Brony culture is appropriative of my own fucking sexuality.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Ryo, what significant LGBT voices have criticized the "coming out of the stable" phrase? I mean, it's kinda amusing if the, uh, stable isn't meant as seriously as the closet was/is.---Mona- (talk) 01:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't think LGBT organization has ever actually condemned the phrase. And they totally intend it to be as serious. Why else come up with a phrase for it? Why else do all the Brony documentaries spend time on the anxiety these men feel when they tell their mother and father that they like watching a cartoon?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

You must be really far up your ass to think a gay Jewish kid from New York would be a Stormfront sympathizer you fedora vaping nutcase.—Ryulong (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Yeah right and you have a POC as a friend. Protip: stop stallking me you creep, stop spamming my page, or revert when I try to contain your nonsense. I'm overally anyway not interested in the stuff you are interested in, so you can continue edit your articles unperturbed. — Aneris ✻ (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

So, looking over this, as well as numerous more mundane quotes that I didn't post because they're just boring, it's pretty clear that Ryulong is mentally disturbed in some way. Worse, he's (by his own admission) socially isolated, compounding the problem immensely. Unfortunately, he's also a self-righteous, grandiose asshole with little ability to introspect, which makes it difficult to convince him to even examine his own behavior. He will likely be a self-righteous asshole for the rest of his life. Oh well.
 
So, looking over this, as well as numerous more mundane quotes that I didn't post because they're just boring, it's pretty clear that Ryulong is mentally disturbed in some way. Worse, he's (by his own admission) socially isolated, compounding the problem immensely. Unfortunately, he's also a self-righteous, grandiose asshole with little ability to introspect, which makes it difficult to convince him to even examine his own behavior. He will likely be a self-righteous asshole for the rest of his life. Oh well.

I liken my mental image of LongRyu as being the literal real life version of "Jenkins" from the South Park World of Warcraft episode. A suspiciously OPL looking fatass (don't know if Mike actually looks like this IRL, haven't seen the pics of him in a long time) who spends 30 minutes sleeping a day and 23.5 hours every day playing WoW.

Only for RyuDrag, instead of even just being a game with some social aspects, it's a fucking wiki nobody ever treats as being the end-all, be all factual source of anything.

In a sense, this makes Ruy even more pathetic than a fictional character doing almost the exact same thing.

Better yet, a wiki article he has no control over himself.

Even better - a wiki article neither he nor his squad of conspirator sockpuppet friends have control over. Ryu's only even still got some muscle left on RW because his buddies keep swooping in to save his ass and make some of his desired changes (which really make it obvious Ryu's just trying to make the wiki into his goddamn soapbox in the end). It's perfect.

It's decided, then. Dragondick is my next wiki subject.

And on this day, the first of the month December, in the year two thousand and fifteen, did the mighty Jaimas turn some of his attention away from making the bloody corpse of the reputation of the Wu couple even bloodier, and with a mighty hand, scarred by the flames of countless internet flamewars, point at the moron known as Ryulong, and he did say:

"I'll give you a wiki article nightmare like you wouldn't believe."
 
Back