Worst of Stephen King - Worst books or stories

Worst story collections

  • The Bazaar of Bad Dreams

    Votes: 15 10.5%
  • Different Seasons

    Votes: 5 3.5%
  • Everything's Eventual

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Four Past Midnight

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Full Dark, No Stars

    Votes: 10 7.0%
  • Hearts in Atlantis

    Votes: 55 38.5%
  • If It Bleeds

    Votes: 13 9.1%
  • Just After Sunset

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • Night Shift

    Votes: 10 7.0%
  • Nightmares & Dreamscapes

    Votes: 7 4.9%
  • Skeleton Crew

    Votes: 7 4.9%

  • Total voters
    143
The reason why King's narrative and endings suck is because he doesn't seem to plan ahead.

I read his "On Writing" memoir/autobiography thing where he brings up an author who says he starts his work by writing the ending first, to which King scoffed at because it "takes the adventures out of writing" or something to that extent.

Problem with that, knowing from personal experience, is that you kind of need to plan a story out. You don't need to explicitely write out an ending to begin with, but have at least have a general idea of maybe how everything will play out along with other scenes too.

It's more obvious with his more "epic" work like The Stand and IT and most definitely the Dark Tower series.

Why his more smaller scale things and short stories tend to be better because it's not all Harry Potter, make it up as he goes only to collapse under its own 1000-page weight by the end.
 
The reason why King's narrative and endings suck is because he doesn't seem to plan ahead.

I read his "On Writing" memoir/autobiography thing where he brings up an author who says he starts his work by writing the ending first, to which King scoffed at because it "takes the adventures out of writing" or something to that extent.

Problem with that, knowing from personal experience, is that you kind of need to plan a story out. You don't need to explicitely write out an ending to begin with, but have at least have a general idea of maybe how everything will play out along with other scenes too.

It's more obvious with his more "epic" work like The Stand and IT and most definitely the Dark Tower series.

Why his more smaller scale things and short stories tend to be better because it's not all Harry Potter, make it up as he goes only to collapse under its own 1000-page weight by the end.
You know what the worst part of it is? That senile old Boomer fuck already had an entire outline, complete and ready-to-go, for the entire Dark Tower series, by book 2 or 3. He claims he "must've lost or misplaced it" over the years and years he kept his fanbase waiting George RR Martin style while he fucked about doing whatever, but that he went forward with completing the series regardless because it "probably wasn't worth a shit anyway".

i dunno about you, but I'd have rather he not've finished it at all than the 3+ books of borderline incoherent painmed swill we actually got.
 
up to the finale I think IT is his best book, but yeah, the finale is well... pretty WTF.
Now that I think about it, the ending to the Dark Tower was probably worse than It simply due to the time put into it and how goofy it was ("santa claus is throwing snitches at us! Quick! Doodle a picture of him my blond mute and erase all but his googly eyes!") but I excuse it simply because even King knew how stupid his ending was.
But it's one of those things where it would have been almost impossible to deliver after so much build up and build up (not having a child orgy would be a start), I feel like King should have gotten even weirder, more experimental, more surreal than just... a giant spider.
Ya know, as weird as it sounds I dont read King for his imagination or creativity honestly. If I wanted a horror story with fantastic imagery and terrifying sight, I'd pick up Clive Barker. I'm also one of those Obnoxious fags who thinks Robert Mccammon is a better version of King. Boys life>It, Swan Song>The Stand.

I like King the same way I like cracker barrel or seinfeld. Its nothing out of the ordinary in terms of structure or imagery or concept, but it's done in a good comfy quality where you let the mistakes slide and enjoy his really good descriptions of mac-n-cheese.
The ending of Insomnia was kind of like what I'm talking about.
I actually really liked that book mostly for being a bit more nutty than what he usually makes. The idea of a senior citizen talking to aliens with scissors about saving the messiah is just a fun idea all around.
 
Insomnia should have been a small preview of how the Dark Tower actually ended, to be honest. That bit describing Patrick's drawing of the Crimson King peering down at Roland still striding toward the doors of the Tower undaunted through the field of roses should've been a page straight out book 7 instead of the absolute farce we got. "Tricksy" my big white ass, Steve. You throw away perfectly good material to spew drivel.
 
Stephen King was one of the authors I loved when I was a teenager and read to get away from all the Harry Potter faggotry but rereading some of his stuff now a days it's a mixed bag.

Some older titles really need an editor. IT and especially The Stand (and it's mind numbing 400 additional page turbo directors cut edition) come to mind. Really wish Flagg won over those limp wristed dorks from Free Zone.

His current output feels like a parody of himself. Cell was the first time I never bothered to finish one of his books I started.

Course he still has a solid body of work like Misery, Dead Zone, Firestarter and The Shining, one of the rare books that actually creeped me out while reading.
I thought Cell was a a decent potboiler, if you remember at the time it was rumored he was going to retire after the final Dark Tower novel, 2005 was one of the few years without a new novel outside of a Hard Case Crime spinoff.

So Cell at least signified he was back.

I also want to add, I enjoyed 1408.
Both the short story and movie
Yup, 1408, both story and movie, are great.

I've only read a few King books but I remember a scene in Cell where he spent several paragraphs describing the swing of a fat, black man's cock as he ran down the street and I felt like that was a good insight into his mind as a creative.
lmao, don't remember that.

Anyone read Dedication? I think it's in Nightmares and Dreamscapes. Jesus CHRIST, how does this TDS motherfucker not get cancelled over racism?
It's LIDERULLY the story of a black hotel maid who goes to a hoo doo woman (his words), to find the real "father" of her child who becomes a published author.
If you think the It orgy scene is fucked up, read Dedication because this black woman cleans the hotel room where this white (racist--her words) famous author stays. And every time the author either fucks some woman or jacks off in bed, the black woman

Goes.
and.
licks.
up.
his.
spent.
jizz.
off.
the.
sheets.

And "somehow" that makes this guy the boy's NATURAL TROO AND HONEST FATHER even though the real father is the black woman's black husband who dies in the story.
Yikes, I forgot about Dedication.

I wonder what he was trying to say there?

You know what the worst part of it is? That senile old Boomer fuck already had an entire outline, complete and ready-to-go, for the entire Dark Tower series, by book 2 or 3. He claims he "must've lost or misplaced it" over the years and years he kept his fanbase waiting George RR Martin style while he fucked about doing whatever, but that he went forward with completing the series regardless because it "probably wasn't worth a shit anyway".

i dunno about you, but I'd have rather he not've finished it at all than the 3+ books of borderline incoherent painmed swill we actually got.
It really is terrible what happened with the Dark Towers given that King really seemed like he was going somewhere with book 3.

Now that I think about it, the ending to the Dark Tower was probably worse than It simply due to the time put into it and how goofy it was ("santa claus is throwing snitches at us! Quick! Doodle a picture of him my blond mute and erase all but his googly eyes!") but I excuse it simply because even King knew how stupid his ending was.
Yup, it was so lame, The Crimson King is supposed to be the ultimate evil of King's multiverse... and it's an old guy going "EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"?

I like King the same way I like cracker barrel or seinfeld. Its nothing out of the ordinary in terms of structure or imagery or concept, but it's done in a good comfy quality where you let the mistakes slide and enjoy his really good descriptions of mac-n-cheese.
That's a very good characterization of him as a matter of fact, the real genuine talent he has is simply his very digestible, easy to read writing style, that's not something that's actually easy to do.

I actually really liked that book mostly for being a bit more nutty than what he usually makes. The idea of a senior citizen talking to aliens with scissors about saving the messiah is just a fun idea all around.
Indeed, it's a refreshingly weird, unique book, the only issue is the hamfisted politics with anti-abortion characters.

Insomnia should have been a small preview of how the Dark Tower actually ended, to be honest. That bit describing Patrick's drawing of the Crimson King peering down at Roland still striding toward the doors of the Tower undaunted through the field of roses should've been a page straight out book 7 instead of the absolute farce we got. "Tricksy" my big white ass, Steve. You throw away perfectly good material to spew drivel.
Indeed, Insomnia has a better confrontation with the Crimson King than Dark Tower does.
 
Alot of his newer stuff. There was one I read a while ago, can't remember the title, about kids who are taken to some secret power place after their parents are killed. Lost interest in that one pretty fast. Although Revival was pretty good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Constellationzero
Lunch at the Gotham Cafe: that's another weird one. It's not his greatest, but I've read it a few times because I was drawn to the utter WTF-ness. It's a pretty decent slice of life, and slice of mentally ill life. I disagree with King's own commentary about the protagonist being psycho as the wife though. He wanted a second crack at his marriage and he was rightly incensed at his wife's nastiness and lack of gratefulness.
 
Alot of his newer stuff. There was one I read a while ago, can't remember the title, about kids who are taken to some secret power place after their parents are killed. Lost interest in that one pretty fast. Although Revival was pretty good.
Sounds like Black House, the sequel to The Talisman he wrote with Peter Straub. Talisman was pretty good but King tried tying this into his Dark Tower mythos and it came off a bit forced. Would have been better as a stand alone potboiler focusing on the Albert Fish inspired killer
 
  • Informative
Reactions: KiwiFuzz
Sounds like Black House, the sequel to The Talisman he wrote with Peter Straub. Talisman was pretty good but King tried tying this into his Dark Tower mythos and it came off a bit forced. Would have been better as a stand alone potboiler focusing on the Albert Fish inspired killer
Frankly it didn't feel like the two books shared any common DNA at all. Grown-up Jack Sawyer contains no trace of child Jack Sawyer, and often it seems like Black House is going to great lengths to pretend The Talisman never happened. The appearance of yet another haunted house with carnivorous tendencies feels like the opposite of that old "third time's a charm" adage.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Jason Wynn
These might not be his worse, but his stories from the anthology Night Visions 6 - Sneakers, Dedication, and The Reploids are the first time I realized as a kid that maybe Stephen King didn't hit a home run everytime he went out. What made these particular stories stand out in my mind was that Dan Simmons and George R.R. Martin had stories in the same anthology that were head and shoulders above King stories. They were so much better I actually felt embarrassed for Stephen King.

Other than that, I really hated Insomnia, Rose Madder, Under the Dome, and the last few Dark Tower books. He seems to have gotten some of his mojo back recently. I really enjoyed both 11/22/63 and Revival.
 
Sounds like Black House, the sequel to The Talisman he wrote with Peter Straub. Talisman was pretty good but King tried tying this into his Dark Tower mythos and it came off a bit forced. Would have been better as a stand alone potboiler focusing on the Albert Fish inspired killer
I found it . It's called The Institute. I still need to read Tailsman
 
His tweets.....they are the worst.

What are you talking about, that's some of his best works yet!

I don't know what motivated Stephen King to delve into comedy but he clearly has a knack for it. His satire of a bat-shit crazy Twitter leftist is nothing short of genius, in fact, he almost convinces me that the Twitter persona he made is actually real and not some crazy fabrication.

God, could you imagine a literary mastermind like Stephen King actually holding such shallow views, making such ill-informed hot takes, and going out of his way to flip out and piss on people who think differently then him, like a child finding out someone doesn't like their favorite video game?

That would just be silly!
 
Hopefully I don't derail the thread here but I thought the first two seasons of Mr. Mercedes where really good the last season kinda fell off due to how they decided to structure everything but it wasn't terrible. How do the books hold up in comparison? Another case of better adaption than source?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fliddaroonie
Do you know what really pissed me off about the Dark Tower? For three books we get all these teasing references to Roland's past and the fall of Gilead, and then we finally get a flashback but it's got nothing to do with that, it's just some stupid love story. Oh, and King gets his characters mixed up or just retcons his previous plans so Flagg's alias is both Marten and Walter.
 
The IT orgy
I remember when someone created a top 10 list on Listverse when the It remake was released and mentioned how sweet the scene was in the book.
https://listverse.com/2017/09/16/10-disturbing-aspects-of-stephen-kings-it-cut-from-the-new-film/
Okay, this is the big one. We still can’t believe that this wasn’t edited out of the book the second the manuscript was handed over to the publisher. Behold the power of Stephen King.


This section would have taken place in the film between the scene where The Losers’ Club “defeats Pennywise” in his lair and the scene where the seven children stand on the banks of the river, making a blood oath to return if IT ever comes back.


In the novel, IT’s lair is in an extremely dark place miles below the surface of the town of Derry. After Pennywise is “killed off,” the evil clown’s deadlights cease shining and The Losers’ Club is lost in the dark. Left to wander around until they die.


Then Beverly gets an idea.


The preteen girl takes each of her male best friends to the side and lets them, one after the other, have sex with her—right there in the sewer. Again, in typical King fashion, the sequence (called “Love & Desire”) is played out in graphic detail with each of the six boys.


Somehow, through the magic of coitus, Beverly’s act of love and desire works. The Losers’ Club is suddenly able to navigate the pitch-black tunnels and return to the safety of that broken, glass Coke bottle.

We seriously have no idea how this chapter made it into the book and why it isn’t considered straight-up illegal. That said, the sequence is very sweet and stands as an expression of the deep connection these seven children will share for the rest of time. Or maybe it’s just pervy exploitation.

You decide.

What's funny is how people are afraid to say this scene was not only necessary, it was wrong. They're afraid because Stephen King is popular and they'll be singled out if they put one toe out of line.
 
The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon destroyed what little interest I had left in King after the Regulators/Desperation duology of suck. His short stories were some of my favorites before that though the many misses stood out for all the wrong reasons. Popsy was just wtf why.
Anyone read Dedication? I think it's in Nightmares and Dreamscapes. Jesus CHRIST, how does this TDS motherfucker not get cancelled over racism?
It's LIDERULLY the story of a black hotel maid who goes to a hoo doo woman (his words), to find the real "father" of her child who becomes a published author.
If you think the It orgy scene is fucked up, read Dedication because this black woman cleans the hotel room where this white (racist--her words) famous author stays. And every time the author either fucks some woman or jacks off in bed, the black woman

Goes.
and.
licks.
up.
his.
spent.
jizz.
off.
the.
sheets.

And "somehow" that makes this guy the boy's NATURAL TROO AND HONEST FATHER even though the real father is the black woman's black husband who dies in the story.
Dedication was hilariously fucked up! Shitty people making good authors, fine, but racist cum gobbling ("it was a compulsion cumpulsion, she said") was one of the most insane things he ever wrote. Honestly, the entire character of Susannah in the Dark Tower was pure cringe too. Nightmares & Dreamscapes was more misses than hits. The bit about Cora flashing a kid in It Grows On You was pretty weird as well.

I did like Insomnia, Firestarter, Night Shift, Skeleton Crew, Needful Things, the first half of The Stand and even the opening of Cell was promising. The Wolves of the Calla was by far my favorite of the Dark Tower books because it made a good stand-alone story even if you weren't bogged down by the lore. And while the getting there was extremely rough, the actual ending of the Dark Tower was IMO King's best and the only way it really could have ended wrt Roland.

His more human, less supernatural shorts always stood out to me more, like Rage, The Last Rung on the Ladder, the Long Walk and the Ledge. Agree though that 1408 as both a short and a movie adaptation were good. The Mist was a good story and decent movie up til the stupid ending. Different Seasons was pretty solid though really, Apt Pupil is a messed up concept and the movie held no interest for me. I stopped reading him entirely after Everything's Eventual.
 
Do you know what really pissed me off about the Dark Tower? For three books we get all these teasing references to Roland's past and the fall of Gilead, and then we finally get a flashback but it's got nothing to do with that, it's just some stupid love story. Oh, and King gets his characters mixed up or just retcons his previous plans so Flagg's alias is both Marten and Walter.
I quite liked the flashbacks that form the bulk of Wizard and Glass. To me, the problem is the rest of it: it all reads like some muddled, washed up, has-been actor desperately ad-libing his lines while being fed a rough draft of that episode's script through an earpiece with poor reception a la Johnny Depp.
 
Back