Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do molotovs still work as an anti-tank weapon?

They should work. Around six of them can be dropped onto a vehicle near a building two stories or higher. I doubt they'd be effective against the heavier tanks though.

Now that I think of it, civies can just drop molotovs onto unsuspecting Russians below. Expect to see some nasty vidyas
 
Has there been any news today? I've been driving and the highlights are all shitty memes and people complaining about shitty memes.
(Please reply, not updoot. We need less bad highlights)
The only significant news I can think of is that Ukraine has lost more ground, more businesses and corporations are stopping their services in Russia, and those guys that apparently died on Snake Island when the war started may not of died at all and were instead captured.
 
Don't understand why people are freaking out about nukes in Belarus. It's a tiny country that's a close ally of Russia right on Russia's doorstep. The Western equivalent would be France deploying nukes in Belgium or the US deploying nukes in Canada. Usually when Russia freaks out about nukes being deployed it's because a hostile power is deploying them close to Russia (Ukraine or Turkey). When this was done to the US (Cuban Missile Crisis) we shit our pants as well. It involves completely different principles so there's no hypocrisy involved.

That said I absolutely think we should deploy nukes in Japan, because it's retarded to let a country with incredibly dense urban centers sit pretty next to other hostile nuclear powers with zero weapons of their own for deterrence purposes.
 
They should work. Around six of them can be dropped onto a vehicle near a building two stories or higher. I doubt they'd be effective against the heavier tanks though.

Now that I think of it, civies can just drop molotovs onto unsuspecting Russians below. Expect to see some nasty vidyas
And when the Russians had enough, they'd just call in heavy artillery to flatten the building.

Oh well, they're being vilified as boo boo bad guys anyway regardless of restraints so they may as well live up to it.
 
Why would japan do that, they are continually at the point of nuclear breakout within 6 months of getting the green light? no point in sharing nukes

The same reason why several European nations that are fully capable of making their own nukes keep American weapons instead, its a cost effective way of having a nuclear deterrence and further ensures the US will take its defense treaties seriously.
 
Sorry, but your internet daddy is retarded and making an emotional based argument. The less womanly reason why they aren't doing the American strategy of war is because one MOAB costs 16 million dollars. Conscripts are much, much cheaper and more prudent for what might come next.
Internet daddy? What the fuck are you talking about? I've never given even faint praise for CRP. Your blinding hatred for either CRP or Putin has turned you fucking retarded.

Case in point, the US is sending 6.4 billion.. but yeah, they are TOTALLY GONNA CHEAP OUT ON ROCKETS!!! Fucking idiot.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-congress-for-6-4-billion-for-ukraine-crisis
 
ED89E9C1-BFF9-47F0-B009-4B0DE0872932.jpeg
 
They recently wrote an article basically saying owning a gun means you have a small cock, while encouraging minors in foreign lands like Ukraine to handle rifles banned by the NFA.

My theory is that it comes down to what these liberals really want. They look at the GOP winning culture wars, they look at /pol/'s memes, they look at Trump battering everybody because it's fun for him, and they don't think it's horrible and shouldn't be done. They just want to be the people who do it. They want to be the people who gatekeep masculinity, protecting the good trans kids from the evil gun-loving trannies who just want guns because they're not real men. They want to call Trump a cock-holster who gets deep-dicked on the regular because he's not one of the good homos, like the ones who safely wave rainbow flags during equality days/events and otherwise quietly and passively melt into the suburban background.

They want to poke fun at the obvious developmental disability and retardation of people who don't follow the mainstream narrative, because anybody who disagrees with them obviously is lesser than them because they think differently. And, of course, any minority who dares speak out against the endless expansion of the welfare state or widening of government authority over our lives is immediately labeled an Uncle Tom, uppity and problematic in whatever ways they think they can safely say it. But they can do all of this and feel good about it, because they're doing the right thing, these wonder bread watered down social zealots, these misbegotten problematizing jackals as eager to rip each other apart as they are to trundle violently into their culture wars against the real enemy, the ones who force them to think, if only for a millisecond, that they're not messiahs.

Sorry for ranting. But I fucking hate those people.
 
Day 4 and Kyiv and Kharkiv still stand. If one of those two aren't captured by tomorrow, there's definitely gonna be a panic mode in regards to the Russian's military plans.
I doubt it. Only a fucking idiot goes to war and expect for it to only last a day. While I'm sure that things aren't going as well as Putin had hoped, I doubt they're anywhere near his worst case scenarios either. For example, while I suspect that Zelensky turned out to have bigger balls than Putin and his advisors thought by not cutting and running at the first threat, I'm sure they made plenty of plans where Zelensky attempts to hang onto power and is successful at providing some degree of leadership. So while yeah Russia's troops are encountering resistance and having problems, they're still progressing towards their goals at what they probably consider to be an adequate pace.

Really, the hardest thing about evaluating how things are going for them is not knowing what their final goals are for the invasion. Topple Ukraine's government to install one favorable to them? Annex Ukraine into Russia entirely? Annex parts of the south and south-east so that the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts become part of Russia, along with enough of the coastal regions that they have the ports, overland access to Crimea, and can ensure that Crimea's water supply can't be cut off? Something else?

So how good or poorly things are going for them is going to depend on what their goal is. If part of their goals relied on Zelensky either folding or being unpopular enough to be readily overthrown by his own people, then yeah they might be in trouble. If Zelensky staying in power ultimately doesn't matter as long as he can be forced to accept the demands for what Putin wants, then they're probably doing just fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back