I disagree with this sentiment for a couple of reasons but I've been thinking about this line of thought for a bit. I think the west wants Russia to destroy Ukraine. We know even flirting with the idea of adding a country that close to Russia will cause instability. I refuse to believe the top brass and policy makers in our country doesn't know this. What if the plan was to not actually get Ukraine join us but to force Russia's hand to invade which in term would cause Russia's own self-destruction or severely damage their own foreign relations and/or military capability? This would essentially kill multiple birds with one stone.
1. Make Russia lose a vital asset. Again, we don't actually have to get Ukraine to join NATO but just make the region unstable enough to were Russia can't control it effectively.
2. This invasion gives the US and other western allies a good reason to economically untangle ourselves from Russia.
3. Make Russia look politically deranged and uncooperative that even their closes allies (India, Iran, and even China to a lesser degree) wipe their hands clean from them.
4. Re-establish our reputation and dominance in the world as leader of democracy (Foreign support/likeability of America has skyrocketed).
Could this be a sort of test run to bring down a superpower without using nuclear weapons? It would be interesting if these were the true intentions US lawmakers had in mind.