Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
A question for everyone, do you think if Belarus intervenes will their soldiers do well or not? The majority of their vehicles are Soviet era and the only war they have been involved in as a country so far is this and limited combat in the Libyan Civil War.
I think they will do fine at the task they supposedly are given. Cutting off supply lines from the west. Even if their tanks all get blown up thats still blocking the highways.

Also soviet T72's are old but not shit. They are still used all over the world.
cd7702482bf84a41e16964a324a69f89.jpgpic.jpg1231869.jpg
 
@mr.moon1488 and @Jet Fuel Johnny and @JosephStalin , I am surprised that no one has brought this up.

Remember when Clinton was bombing all those slav niggers in Serbia for hurting muzzies.

The Russians took over an airport at the end, I believe this was before Putin became president.

Anyways one of our generals wanted to bomb those vodka drinking subhumans back to hell for taking over the airport and the British cucked on it because they were scared it would start WW3 as seriouz bizness.

Any insight on those events?

 
4th Rome about to be provoked into copying 3rd Rome?

The US is not going to expand NATO further. Even keeping NATO where it is right now is probably beyond US voters' appetite or interest for international engagement. As much as I would prefer the US being hegemonic, there simply isn't political will in the country for foreign involvement beyond lobbing drones at brown people and keeping the EU from imploding with credit-default swaps.

Maybe if NATO lasts for another 10-15 years we'll see the US get serious about it again, but right now no one really cares.
 
The credibility of the west is very low. Especially after COVID and how the west prioritised itself with these global organisations, meant to be for everyone.

UN being useless for poor and non-western countries at peace. When it's useless with Russia, if the West doesn't get it's way. Will they abide by it? Or trash it with out consequences. ICC has very low credibility after not going after Israel or people like Bush.

The need to move away from the west international banking and financial system was accelerated and necessitated by weaponising it over this.

The west already holds itself to a different standard, the more they do so, the more countries will be willing to move away and align with China.
tbh all I hear is the same cope I heard from 2003-2009 and none of it ever came to pass

Credibility to who? Why does their - whoever they are - opinion matter? Nobody is going to forswear the Western financial system or global organizations to join China's because of muh covid credibility or muh Western exploitation

The UN is not going anywhere, pure :lunacy:

The need to move away from the Western banking and financial system was accelerated and necessitated for who? Which countries? Name some. Some that aren't laughable examples of ravaged shitholes like Venezuela or countries that have already been cut out of that system like Iran

Who are these countries that are going to be more willing to move away and align with China?
 
I think modern ATGMs might have something to say about that.
Keep in mind the task given. Most sensible task here is simply to secure the western roads to severely limit the foreign supplies flooding into Ukraine. They'd likely be fighting partisan groups most, with only very rare skirmishes with the Ukrainian military who are a bit focused on the east.

Modern ATGM is unlikely to become a serious issue.

This front is likely to be fought using surplus Cold War equipment on both sides.
 
You're the only one that brought it up, implied I believed otherwise and then keeps sperging out about it, all while acting like a government of crooks, liars, grifters and nazi larpers funded by jewish oligarchs is somehow in the right. Yes, take your meds before you hurt yourself or others, your dissociative behavior is alarming.
But we have to care because the hashtags told us to!

Honestly I find it unbelievable, even by my standards, that the people are truly this ignorant. Although it's kinda hilarious that the de facto Praetorian Guard of Zelinsky are a bunch of Slavic neo-Nazis. The stupidest kind. I'm of German ancestry heavily and I don't even like normal Nazis, these guys would be gassed by Adolf Hitler before you could say blitzkrieg.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Green Man
@mr.moon1488 and @Jet Fuel Johnny and @JosephStalin , I am surprised that no one has brought this up.

Remember when Clinton was bombing all those slav niggers in Serbia for hurting muzzies.

The Russians took over an airport at the end, I believe this was before Putin became president.

Anyways one of our generals wanted to bomb those vodka drinking subhumans back to hell for taking over the airport and the British cucked on it because they were scared it would start WW3 as seriouz bizness.

Any insight on those events?


The commander of the British armored recon platoon that refused orders to fire on the Russians and averted WW3 ended up being a pop star

EDIT: An article https://www.wearethemighty.com/migh...efied-the-supreme-allied-commander-in-kosovo/

The US is not going to expand NATO further. Even keeping NATO where it is right now is probably beyond US voters' appetite or interest for international engagement. As much as I would prefer the US being hegemonic, there simply isn't political will in the country for foreign involvement beyond lobbing drones at brown people and keeping the EU from imploding with credit-default swaps.

Maybe if NATO lasts for another 10-15 years we'll see the US get serious about it again, but right now no one really cares.

I'd normally agree with you but the neoliberal hive is buzzing with anger and vengeance at the moment
 
Keep in mind the task given. Most sensible task here is simply to secure the western roads to severely limit the foreign supplies flooding into Ukraine. They'd likely be fighting partisan groups most, with only very rare skirmishes with the Ukrainian military who are a bit focused on the east.

Modern ATGM is unlikely to become a serious issue.

This front is likely to be fought using surplus Cold War equipment on both sides.
Ukraine is currently being flooded with literally tens of thousands of AT weapons. All of them coming from the west, if a western front needs AT weapons to kill some tanks threatening to cut off supply lines. They will be there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back