Keffals / Clara Sorrenti / Lucas John Roberts / Queen Clara the Fart Dominatrix / SorrentiThott - Twitter / Twitch slacktivist. Obsessed with being famous. Operator of the Catboy Ranch. Canadian T-Girl porn star and independent Fart Fetish / Findom Dominatrix. Personally sponsored sending Chinese HRT from Brazil to children without parental consent.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Is there anywhere where we can do more digging about his child grooming behavior? The evidence is pretty convincing (to me anyways) but I want to see if we can find something more concrete. Maybe something that would even make his supporters doubt him. Something he’s be forced to address. I’m a retard so any help would be appreciated.
depends on what you're looking for, he and his friends brag about sending minors homemade HRT which is already awful enough, as for the one where they allegedly exposed minors to sexual content (the catboy shit) server got purged when he started getting shit, there's probably stuff to find if you look more deeply into the one that brags the most about the HRT thing, bobposting, but there's already a thread on proving grounds for him
 
It's worse than that. It's 3% of the US population that actually uses Twitter. 22% just have accounts.
Twitter makes you create an account just to search or scroll through tweets easily, so it's not surprising that a huge amount of people make an account just to browse some celebrity's page once or twice a year and nothing more.

I can only speak anecdotally but Twitter doesn't seem like Instagram or even Reddit where there is more of a steady gradient in terms of how much people use the platform. You either avoid Twitter entirely (most people), or you are extremely on Twitter, with very little in between.
 
I can only speak anecdotally but Twitter doesn't seem like Instagram or even Reddit where there is more of a steady gradient in terms of how much people use the platform.
After Tumblr died porn addicts and trannies flocked into Twitter, recently after DeviantArt updated to eclipse a lot of artists moved to Twitter or Instagram, Pixiv slowly gets invaded by sjws so there's some rise of eastern people on Twitter as well, who are not really fond of canelling libtards.

Twitter is becoming a bit of a mess, but it's mostly a safe heaven for troons where they can gang up on others ratio evil transphobes, and groom children into taking hormones. No matter how accepted they feel, Twitter will never be the real world and the real world does not accept deluded trannies.
 
As far as I know the 'Keffals' alias is the only one he's ever used with any consistency. The word is meant to be a combination of 'cock' and 'waffles' iirc.

You’ve got to be fucking kidding me.

cockwaffle.jpg
 
Someone should do a study on how social media affects sense of self as well as personal identity as mediated through online imagery and discourse, and how this contributes to the rise of troonism.

It’s clear to me that trannyism and assorted disorders are at least largely magnified and accelerated by social media consumption.

Perhaps a future government could implement policies to seriously restrict its use, especially to youth.
 
Normally I don't like giving threads to people who are begging for them, but I like this one.

You can tell this guy is panicking. He went from "I won't delete or private cause I'm right!" To very quickly deleting threads and anxiety posting.

He knows he dug a fucking grave and his attempts to climb out made it worse. I like the panic
Never say you're afraid.
Never say you've got nothing to hide.
Never give the internet a challenge.
 
Last edited:
Oh, the person also used the word troon. I've only heard it once in real life and asked if he had an association with a fruit farm website. He said "I'm not on Kiwifarms" -- sure bro (I never mentioned KF).
Troon is used all the time on 4chan, has been in their lexicon for 3+ years at this point. It seems to have creeped into the vocabulary of spergy discord kids too. If you're perpetually online and non-sympathetic towards trannies chances are you've heard the term and at least lurk places where it sees use.
 
Troon is used all the time on 4chan, has been in their lexicon for 3+ years at this point. It seems to have creeped into the vocabulary of spergy discord kids too. If you're perpetually online and non-sympathetic towards trannies chances are you've heard the term and at least lurk places where it sees use.
Yeah, first time I heard the term was back during Chris Chan Idea Guy bullshit, back before I started regularly browsing KF, so it has indeed been out there awhile and has spread pretty far.
 
Keffals whole shtick just seems to be the same as Vaush’s and Hasan’s where they’re all just terrible people who think they’re the good guys because they’re leftists who say trans rights a lot.

Like 99% of people would probably think you’re some weird sex pest predator who wants you to stay away from their kids if they found out you were giving them hormone blockers behind their parents backs. This is including most trans people who don’t use the internet all that much.
 
No it fucking does not.


>Tranny lawyer (retard) says that Section 230 protects the site from stalking / harassment / cyberbullying / whatever charges.
Wrong. Section 230 is like 3 paragraphs long so fucking read it. This stupid fag didn't read the law he claims to be an expert in.


47 U.S. Code § 230(c)(2) is titled CIVIL LIABILITY. There is nothing in Section 230 about CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Harassment and stalking is a crime. So if the site was facilitating this, if I was facilitating this, I already have no expectation of immunity from this statute because it offers none whatsoever. (e)(1) explicitly states "No effect on criminal law.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement of ... any other Federal criminal statute."

What Section 230 does is protect websites (like mine, like Twitter, like Facebook) from direct civil liability from both what is said on the platform and what is removed from the platform. If someone defames you on Twitter, you must sue THEM and not Twitter. This is critical to the continued existence of open platforms. If Facebook was personally liable for every post on Facebook, you can bet your sweet ass that the amount of shit getting deleted from Facebook would be astronomical. Only the safest, least offensive things imaginable could survive with that sort of liability.

On deleting, the 'sword' to the 'sword and shield' of Section 230 is the ability to delete things without liability. If someone makes money from being on Facebook and they are banned, they cannot sue Facebook for the resulting damages (i.e. loss of sales revenue from no advertising).

What I can do is personally commit civil offenses. If I said something defamatory and I was sued, then I still am liable for what I say. That's it.

There is no qualifying factors for this. If it is an 'interactive computer service', it is protected.
Alright, so all of this made me actually look back into Section 230 law. It came up as an important part of class back in uni, when the professor brought it up like this:
Section 230 protects publishers of content from liability for what their members post. However, if the site goes out of its way to curate or delete too much user content without applying a base rule for moderation equally, it loses these protections.
(the final gave us several test examples more or less based on this definition)
Well, as it turns out, I'm wrong, and you only seem to lose Section 230 protections when you directly edit the users' content and change its meaning, not when you moderate it or curate it. At all.

I paid $5,000 for that class. Uni is a fucking scam.
 
It blows me away that these people are LGBT while being commies while it's very fucking obvious that the LGBT are usually the first useful idiots to go.
These morons don't know that the ones running the show find them repulsive and will order their execution the moment they get the power they want.

It just feels so backwards
 
I don't know if this is just a hilarious misunderstanding of female anatomy or if some Thai doctor actually redirected keffals urethrae to their asshole.
Someone should do a study on how social media affects sense of self as well as personal identity as mediated through online imagery and discourse, and how this contributes to the rise of troonism.
We already have pretty good data on the first half of that. It is generally accepted now that young girls who regularly participate on social media platforms have huge rates of body dysmorphia and dissatisfaction. This leads to real world consequences, like increased rates of depression, anxiety, and eating disorders.

Keep your children off social media people, it is scientifically harmful.
 
Back