- Joined
- Jan 21, 2021
I could only agree. Credit where it's due and all that.You would be too, in their shoes.
Russkies better step up their AA game to prevent a repeat, if they want to avoid another such strike.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could only agree. Credit where it's due and all that.You would be too, in their shoes.
Russkies better step up their AA game to prevent a repeat, if they want to avoid another such strike.
JFC that video is so sad...
The problem is the fact both Russia and Ukraine uses the same equipment, with alot of the rotary wing aircraft still wearing soviet standard camouflage so it's hard to IFF especially when honestly up to this point for most of us it was inconceivable that the Ukrainians would be suicidal enough to launch sorties into Russia proper.The state of Russian AA might quiet some of the voices claiming the A-10 is obsolete and would just get ripped to pieces by a wall of Russian AA. If an Mi-24 can slip in and out and blow up Russian infrastructure you can do it with an A-10
Most of his cabinet is made up of his former comic buddies and people he knew from his career.Holy fuck did some more digging and the head of the SBU, Ukraine's counter-intelligence service, was a stand up comic prior to his appointment
Holy shit if this was a false flag to try and drag Belarus in or justify mobilization Russia truly is a joke.Well now it's getting weird, Ukraine Ministry Defense disavows that Ukrainian forces were responsible for Belgorod attack:
"The Ukrainian General Staff tells my colleague @fpiatov, it does “not have this information” that Ukrainian forces attacked an oil depot in Belgorod oblast, hinting that the attack could have been a Russian false flag operation to justify further brutal attacks on."
Russia is using the fact of the Belgorod attack to withdraw from negotiations from Ukraine:
Why the fuck do the Russians need any excuse to withdraw from negotiations when they're already sanctioned to hell and noone is pressuring them to have negotiations? Why does an attack on Belgorod invalidate negotiating when they're dropping cruise missiles on Kiev?
Something strange is afoot
My operating theory is that the ghost of kiev's son, seeking revenge for his dad, hijacked a ukrainian attack helicopter with the help of his dad's CO and wove through the net of russian air defences while listening to slavic hardbass on his walkman (its slavland ok they are poor and might still use them)
Belgorod region (31) on the plates so I wouldn't doubt it.Video claiming to be from Belgorod showing a big queue for gas.
View attachment 3132558
What's he saying?A Ukrainian ticktocker made a video about the fact that the ruble will soon become the new currency of the country. It ended badly for him
View attachment 3132730
The state of Russian AA might quiet some of the voices claiming the A-10 is obsolete and would just get ripped to pieces by a wall of Russian AA. If an Mi-24 can slip in and out and blow up Russian infrastructure you can do it with an A-10
Helicopters have a maneuverability advantage that fixed wing aircraft cannot compete with, which allows them to use terrain masking in ways fixed wing cannot. The Panavia Tornado was designed for high speed low altitude attacks, and 7 were shot down in Iraq in their runway bombing runs. It got the British to rethink the whole low altitude attack thing and it was shifted to mid-altitude strikes for the rest of the war.NATO projections have a tendency to exagerate Russian capabilities.
Also I can see ways to be creative with the usage of A-10s. Either situations like the northern Russian convoy where 40 miles of Russian tanks and trucks is just too tempting to not risk a A-10 to just light up the whole damn convoy, to for example doing as the Ukrainians just did, wait until there's an obvious gap in the Russian defense, slip a wing of A-10s into Russia flying low and fast, and just wreck every bridge, train, depot, and military canp behind the front
They can "tank" some amount of 14.5mm fire but only critical areas are armored against 23mm. Tunguskas and Pantsirs have 30mm cannons which I wouldn't be optimistic about.seeing that only 7 A-10's have been shot down in combat I like their odds against regular AA. They're flying tanks.
I mean, due to demand alone, the ruble gonna just rise in prices instead, unless they do something like peg the ruble to some fixed exchange rate to euro, lul.Back to the gas issue. I promised to run Putin's decree by my lawyer friend and he pointed out something I overlooked.
- the payment is considered complete only after the entire amount in roubles is credited to Gazprom's ruble account.
- the roubles must be purchased on the stock exchange,
- last month, Europe bought 12 billion euro worth of gas.
- the exhange rate of rouble to euro is currently 90,
- 12 billion * 90 = 1,080,000,000,000 roubles,
- YIKES?!
- there will not be 1 trillion roubles on the stock exchange every month to exchange those euros.
His conclusion:
This law condemns the Europeans to find the roubles they need to pay for gas. And one of the main ways to get roubles is through trade with Russia. Except they cannot because sanctions. Oops.
What's he saying?
This is why I shy away from playing chess with Russians, I tend to lose unless I concentrate really really hard.Back to the gas issue. I promised to run Putin's decree by my lawyer friend and he pointed out something I overlooked.
- the payment is considered complete only after the entire amount in roubles is credited to Gazprom's ruble account.
- the roubles must be purchased on the stock exchange,
- last month, Europe bought 12 billion euro worth of gas.
- the exhange rate of rouble to euro is currently 90,
- 12 billion * 90 = 1,080,000,000,000 roubles,
- YIKES?!
- there will not be 1 trillion roubles on the stock exchange every month to exchange those euros.
His conclusion:
This law condemns the Europeans to find the roubles they need to pay for gas. And one of the main ways to get roubles is through trade with Russia. Except they cannot because sanctions. Oops.
So basically the arrangement is a jewish hypercube?Back to the gas issue. I promised to run Putin's decree by my lawyer friend and he pointed out something I overlooked.
- the payment is considered complete only after the entire amount in roubles is credited to Gazprom's ruble account.
- the roubles must be purchased on the stock exchange,
- last month, Europe bought 12 billion euro worth of gas.
- the exhange rate of rouble to euro is currently 90,
- 12 billion * 90 = 1,080,000,000,000 roubles,
- YIKES?!
- there will not be 1 trillion roubles on the stock exchange every month to exchange those euros.
His conclusion:
This law condemns the Europeans to find the roubles they need to pay for gas. And one of the main ways to get roubles is through trade with Russia. Except they cannot because sanctions. Oops.
I asked if whether is was зрада or перемога. He said that shit should be good long term (though we risk tying our entire economy to gas price just after we finished untying it from oil price), but that things should look up after a couple of years. I asked why we haven't done this before. He said we didn't want to ruin our relations with Europe and spook the investors, but now that this ship has sailed and the masks are off, behold the beastly face of capitalism. It is not pretty.I mean, due to demand alone, the ruble gonna just rise in prices instead, unless they do something like peg the ruble to some fixed exchange rate to euro, lul.