Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

I salute all of you magnificent bastards who did this by being rational and having points they couldn't deny.

This was an excellent example of "fine, I'll take my ball and go home!" silent tantrum.

Conservapedia does the "I'll take my ball and go home" tantrum well. They just openly ban whoever they don't like, and they don't give a shit.

What "Rational" Wiki does is far more pathetic. They pretend they invite disagreement, and even challenge opponents to prove them wrong, because they pride themselves on their alleged ability to face dissent.

Meanwhile, they are bigger chickenshits than CP ever was.

Hilarious.

I wish I could say I was surprised, but I'm not. I'm a trifle disappointed, but I didn't expect much out of these clowns in the first place. I admit I gave them the credit for having the balls just to ban people who were disrupting their narrative, but apparently even that was giving too much credit.

RW: cowards and weaklings.
 
Conservapedia does the "I'll take my ball and go home" tantrum well. They just openly ban whoever they don't like, and they don't give a shit.

What "Rational" Wiki does is far more pathetic. They pretend they invite disagreement, and even challenge opponents to prove them wrong, because they pride themselves on their alleged ability to face dissent.

Meanwhile, they are bigger chickenshits than CP ever was.

Hilarious.

I wish I could say I was surprised, but I'm not. I'm a trifle disappointed, but I didn't expect much out of these clowns in the first place. I admit I gave them the credit for having the balls just to ban people who were disrupting their narrative, but apparently even that was giving too much credit.

RW: cowards and weaklings.
That is just what makes RW so disappointing to keep up with in that sense. Their name for the site is the most ironic thing ever and dumbasses like Ryulong have helped to drag the reputation of the site to the ground period.
 
Are you ready for an internet lawsuit for the ages?

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=1593193&oldid=1592882

Unfuckup Our Living Persons Policy and Ban Ryulong

I will be honest. I have a regular account and I have been here for some years but I want to be sure of my anonymity for this. I am, as my account name suggests, *worried*.

When this Wiki started, it was about mocking the extreme, the mystical snake oil sellers. Articles like Racialism are classic RW. We talked about issues, and when we picked on individuals they were high profile individuals where what we thought was frankly a drop in the ocean. Pat Robertson has a legion of higher profile critics than us. We remembered we were amateurs not professional journalists or lawyers.

Over the last couple of years though our posts about real world people have started to get out of hand. We make extreme, potentially damaging allegations based on a Tumblr post or a tweet from some random individual. Allegations we could never defend in court or to hostile media.

The recent drama over Ryulong has been the last straw for me. I came here for fun and to fight the good fight. I did not come here to get sued, or named, or have my employer contacted.

Looking at our article on GamerGate it is pretty damn clear that there are a lot of bad things to say about the Gators. It is pretty clear some of them are Nazis, some of them have bad histories or whatever. It is also pretty frackin' clear that in places we are making allegations that we cannot possibly defend and our belief we are immune to the law or retaliation by right wing media is a pitiful delusion.

I lurk in wingnut IRC sometimes and that includes some Gator IRC. For whatever reason we are on their radar at the moment. A current op they are planning is to dox as many of the editors here as possible and have people like Ralph at the Ralph Retort and Milo at Breitbart do hitpieces. Earlier they were discussing the real world identity of Queex - they claim they have his name (I will not post it but initials are BW) and he works for an academic institution. I am not precisely sure what he has done. They were working on a lot of other people too.

I also followed the recent debacle with Vordrak. He seems to have lost interest now thanks to CarpetSmoker and he reaching an accommodation. That is a good thing because casual search reveals he has successfully brought and defended litigation against a lot of people and organisations with real lawyers. For example GitHub is a multinational multimillion dollar company. They threatened him to try to stop him writing an article or picturing their staff. His response was to correct their lawyer as patronisingly as possible and then use honeymoon photos of said staff. GitHub caved in and pulled their code of conduct. Then there was his dispute with millionairess rockstar Amy Lee. Result? Forum closed. Akismet? Massive company, caved in to Vordrak's legal threats and closed FreeRedditCheck. He really can't be that bad a lawyer.

Whilst Vordrak has gone now we still have Milo, Ralph and their teenage hordes to deal with. The kicker? They have a legit grouse.

We are allowing wild allegations about Milo on the basis of a Tumblr post. We are letting people here write whatever crap they want and kidding ourselves here that we are untouchable. Someone, Queex I think, was saying it would be illegal to name him. Why? Newspapers here in the States and in the UK name people every day. Even store clerks. He is a statistician. To Milo and his ilk Queex is just prey. Does he really think Breitbart can't call his boss or his dean (if the Gators have the right dox)? Do you want Milo tweeting your picture and some garbled story about you 'defending pedophile Sarah Nyberg' to his 100,000 followers?

My point here is that I am using an anonymous account because I do not want my real world identity found and targeted. It is quite obvious that will happen increasingly. I might be willing to show more of a spine if we were in the right or if we were fighting the good fight but we are NOT. We are currently slightly less accurate than the National Inquirer. I signed on for 'snarky' not 'fuckwitted hate group'.

I did not sign up to defend pedophiles. This is my specimen Ryulong diff 1. Sarah Nyberg admitted she said all the things she said. GamerGate did not take it out of context.

What I want out of this case is for us to tighten up on our standards. I want us to stop poking bears like Milo. I also want Ryulong gone. This place is not a personal army or a platform for an obsessive to hound people. Worried (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 

And their reaction seems to be dismissing it as gator BS, circling wagons, and privately planning how to cover their asses.

No surprises at all.

Gerard and Hipocrite are not gonna like this at all:

(Block log); 23:52 . . Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) unblocked Worried (Talk | contribs) ‎(unjustified)

Called it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593207&oldid=1583039

Weaseloid stands his ground:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593209&oldid=1593207

Hipocrite chugs the koolaid:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593210&oldid=1593209

Weaseloid points out Hip is full of it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593217&oldid=1593210

Hipocrite, manbaby extraordinaire:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hipocrite&curid=148886&diff=1593219&oldid=1584912

 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: chimpburgers
And their reaction seems to be dismissing it as gator BS, circling wagons, and privately planning how to cover their asses.

No surprises at all.

Gerard and Hipocrite are not gonna like this at all:

(Block log); 23:52 . . Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) unblocked Worried (Talk | contribs) ‎(unjustified)

Called it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593207&oldid=1583039

Weaseloid stands his ground:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593209&oldid=1593207

Hipocrite chugs the koolaid:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593210&oldid=1593209

Weaseloid points out Hip is full of it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1593217&oldid=1593210

Hipocrite, manbaby extraordinaire:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hipocrite&curid=148886&diff=1593219&oldid=1584912


Hipocrite will be back in less than 2 days, he can't let the Gators "win."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
I'd have to do some digging, but he is friends with Tarc, a noted SJW who Ryulong is Twitter buddies with.

He definitely is

Sorry that you [Ryulong] died again. My email is enabled, so if you need something specific changed on a specific article, contact me and I'll review the merits on my own per [[WP:BAN]] and consider making the edit myself based on my independent and fully formed review of your proposals and stuff. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 22:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

If you look at his edit history it's almost all Gamergate except for the time where he tried to protect "Condol" on Ryulong's behalf. Unlike the buddyloid edits condol fell to common sense.
 
I see that Tarc was banned indefinitely from Wikipedia. That might be something to check out and see why.

Tarc is super buttflustered over Gamergate and was one of the spergs that got topic banned in the arbitration case. A few months ago he used his Twitter to attack Masem (a brony Wikipedia admin who was involved in the Gamergate clusterfuck and tried to make sure the article adhered to policy, making him hated by the anti-Gamergaters) by repeating what he read on Masem's ED page. ArbCom banhammered Tarc for harassment, producing tears and much salt from his friends (the same people who have bitched and moaned at Gamergaters doing the same kind of shit Tarc did).

https://archive.is/2eiWf

ButthurTarc said:
My support for @TheQuinnspiracy @Spacekatgal and the others remains unchanged, despite @Wikipedia's impotent move to silence another critic.
 
Last edited:
So are "gators" actually doing this, or is this more paranoia and "gators" is just this cult's version of Scientology's "Suppressive Persons?"
Going by KIA, GG's more interested in CISA, Tina Fey "opting out" of outrage culture, and SJWs at Oberlin demanding stupid shit like racially segregated "safe spaces", payment for protesting , and immediate tenure for non-white staff members.
 
So are "gators" actually doing this, or is this more paranoia and "gators" is just this cult's version of Scientology's "Suppressive Persons?"

The answer is always yes and no with GamerGate. If they weren't planning on it, after seeing this, at least some of them will say "Hey, that's a good idea", others will say "Hey, that's a terrible idea" and still others will say "Hey, it's a good idea to pretend like this is a good idea to make GG look bad."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
So because imaginary boogymen are supposedly threatening to do something, you have to ban everyone who remotely disagrees with you about anything.

These are people who routinely piss off crazy religious fanatics and holocaust deniers with their special brand of smug condescension and honeypot invitations to debate, and yet they all have their real-world identities plastered all over that shit. Motherfuckers did you just learn to internet?

Anyways, that post was obvious concern troll, and probably just an excuse to ban the nasty people who keep disagreeing with them in ways they don't have smug answers for. Gamergate pretty obviously isn't going to dox any of these cretins because gamergate is made up of half-retarded perpetually outraged cucks who couldn't dox their own mother if they still lived in her basement (and they do).

Fuck it, let's dox them all ourselves and see how long it takes them to panic and write us up as a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
 
Queex apparently doesn't give a shit after Hipocrite offered to tell him how he got 'backtraced': http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Queex&diff=prev&oldid=1593218

Enable email, I can show you how you were backtraced. Hipocrite (talk) 23:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Psh, this handle has been linked to my identity on the first page of google before now. Competence is not their strong point. Queexchthonic murmurings 00:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

He wasn't lying that it could be found super easy via Google: http://queex.livejournal.com/profile
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Wet and Cynical
Back